Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Bva Going Backwards On Ebenefits?

Rate this question


RickH

Question

Hi all, On 3/242015 my case was on stage 2 prep, then it was sent to stage 3 VSO, it stayed there

less than a day and was sent to stage 4 with veteran law judge(VLJ), today it was sent back to stage 3 VSO.

Does anyone know what going on? I had filled out the attachment asking that it not go back to the RO, and be

sent for decision to the VLJ. where did this this cheese wheel come from?

Thanks, RickH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

asknod,

Great info here! I am not with a DAV or any service group but with the State of Virginia VSO. Not sure if that makes a difference or not?

My case is parallel with Rick's virtually same o same o, Have not hear anything from anyone and I am coming up for my meeting next week at the BVA!

Just guess I will do as you say and let it go and see what happens.

Have been dealing with a very sick 90 year old mom for a while so not enough time to deal with this.

Can I get an attorney if they don't give me what I want and appeal or for a recon?

Stillhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

I agree with what Asknod says, but will add my 2 cents. Have you gotten one of those calls for a "free" burglar alarm system? Yea...they are "free", pretty much like your VSO is "free". Guess who pays for those "free burglar alarms" in the monitoring fees? If you guessed Santa, you are right, and its your turn to play Santa. In a similar way, who do you think "pays" the VSO? In the VSO charters, they agree to "cooperate with VA". I can not emphasize enough what this means...it means you are using YOUR OPPONENT's attorney..who is paid by your opponent. The lawyers "get" who signs their checks, as do VSO's, and give their loyalty to those who sign their checks. That isnt you. Your VSO represents VA...it only "appears" that they represent you. That is even worse, than having your opponents attorney...its having your opponents attorney and THINKING he is your attorney (or representative). Ask Alex how much his "Free" VSO cost him..I know I would have done better if I bought a "free" burglar alarm, as, so far, VSO's have cost me 6 figure retro, unless I can undo the harm they did to me.

About 5 years ago, I was waiting for "my representative (VSO)" to help "me" prepare my appeal. When ebenefits said my appeal was "with VSO" for about 18 months, I finally called them and asked them what they were doing with my appeal (for 18 months). They "explained" to me that I had a docket number and it did not matter how long it took the VSO to "prepare" the appeal, that it would not affect my docket number/appeal order. I found out from the BVA omibudsman, later, that was an absolute lie. In other words, my appeal sat in a VSO's office for 18 months waiting for the National VSO officer to reword my appeal in such a way that the Board would better understand it.

Later, when I looked over what the VSO wrote (rewriting my appeal), I "happened" to notice that every single reference I had about shredded evidence magically disappeared. So, of course, the Board did not know about my shredding..they just knew what the VSO wrote. Wasnt that nice of the VSO to trash the entire substance of my appeal, helping out the VA who signs their checks, all while "I thought" they represented "My" interests.

Also, as I found out in the 18 months it took the VSO's to do this, did NOT count toward my appeal time. In other words, it was not docketed until the VSO sprinkled his holy water on this. That is, the VSO caused an additional 18 month delay, all courtesy of the VA who pays my representative. Remember this next time you give a POA to your VSO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Folks:

Reading these posts does not bode well for overall confidence in a disability system that's supposed to take care of giving Vets a fair shake at a "fair" claims outcome? Once again relying on VSO's could be more that determental to a Vets Claims outcome...that's .if one takes their eyes off the ball thinking someone is going to take care of Vets? Sure, I know that there are great VSO's out there that do a terriffic job and I don't want to take anything away from those folks because they are out there helping vets as well. Just like during the President Ronald Reagan ERA Nuclear SaltII Talks. it's best to "Trust, but to also, Verify, that everything is being done as agreed upon before one goes down the road thinking everything is humming along as agreed upon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I guess VSO's are like any other professional.

Some are professional/hardworking and some take the least route of resistance.

Veterans do yourself a favor: Try to learn as much about the VA claims system as you can.

You are your own best advocate.............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

I just think Vets need to know the cold hard facts before they sign their POA. Im not saying all VSO's are bad..to the contrary, many are helpful, especially if you are a newbie and dont know what a 21-4138 or a 21-526 is. However, the help you get here will be better. If one of us leads you amuck, the others will come in and say, "no, that is not correct".

Nobody does that for the VSO..he just "helps" more Vets, with advice like, "No, dont appeal a zero percent rating...they could get mad and take that away...you got your foot in the door..so dont push it".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Dear Stillhere,

My first DRO hearing with a VA rater was July 1990 before there really was such a thing as a DRO. It was called a local or RO hearing. I got to look at the c-file and immediately asked where all my Air America stuff from 1970-1972 was. Short answer was if they weren't milrecs, then the VA wasn't responsible for going out to find them in NW Thailand.

My DAV rep. named Ron called me the day before and said we'd meet at his office in the Fed. Bldg an hour early. He got there 10 minutes before the hearing and walked right past me sitting in the hall. We talked for 5 minutes and it was obvious he didn't have a clue about me or my claim. At the BVA, the VSO Team pled for benefit of the doubt. No request for a remand to go get the records. In the meantime, I gave them a photocopy of part of it I found. They called them "PMR's as in private medical records as opposed to "service " medical records or SMRs. Didn't make any diff if the only English written on a Thai medical form was Sgt. Graham/ LZ Tango 11. They stopped short of calling me a liar.

If you haven't heard from your VSO, you better be shopping some new legal rainmakers.

J1VO

Edited by asknod

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use