Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Weighing Of Evidence At The Dro

Rate this question


jfrei

Question

Does anybody know how or what evidence the DRO looks at that outweighs another piece of evidence in Determining SC for an injury at the Regional Office hearing? I am sure my attorney has everything he said its straight forward cut and dry. But like always I'm paranoid its 21 days from now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

LOD (line of Duty) is a determination military in nature as is a willful misconduct violation (or lack thereof). VA cannot make LOD determinations. These occur before separation. Same for willful misconduct. VA cites to 3.102 for its authority but again. they cannot reach back into the UCMJ past to make these decisions. Either they are, or they are not, in the military records. If not, you cannot be rejudged post-service by the VA.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I forget but didnt the VA make a statement in the decision as to the LOD?

And that was basis of the CUE regarding this part of your evidence?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

LOD (line of Duty) is a determination military in nature as is a willful misconduct violation (or lack thereof). VA cannot make LOD determinations. These occur before separation. Same for willful misconduct. VA cites to 3.102 for its authority but again. they cannot reach back into the UCMJ past to make these decisions. Either they are, or they are not, in the military records. If not, you cannot be rejudged post-service by the VA.

Is there anywhere that states this or is it just assumed that they cannot, and in my case they have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Willful misconduct is cited in 3.301 as doing something that you know is wrong like drug addiction leading to HCV via intravenous drug abuse.

§ 3.301 Line of duty and misconduct.

(a) Line of duty. Direct service connection may be granted only when a disability or cause of death was incurred or aggravated in line of duty, and not the result of the veteran's own willful misconduct or, for claims filed after October 31, 1990, the result of his or her abuse of alcohol or drugs.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 105)
(b) Willful misconduct. Disability pension is not payable for any condition due to the veteran's own willful misconduct.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1521)
© Specific applications; willful misconduct. For the purpose of determining entitlement to service-connected and nonservice-connected benefits the definitions in §§ 3.1 (m) and (n) of this part apply except as modified within paragraphs ©(1) through ©(3) of this section. The provisions of paragraphs ©(2) and ©(3) of this section are subject to the provisions of § 3.302 of this part where applicable.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)
(1) Venereal disease. The residuals of venereal disease are not to be considered the result of willful misconduct. Consideration of service connection for residuals of venereal disease as having been incurred in service requires that the initial infection must have occurred during active service. Increase in service of manifestations of venereal disease will usually be held due to natural progress unless the facts of record indicate the increase in manifestations was precipitated by trauma or by the conditions of the veteran's service, in which event service connection may be established by aggravation. Medical principles pertaining to the incubation period and its relation to the course of the disease; i.e., initial or acute manifestation, or period and course of secondary and late residuals manifested, will be considered when time of incurrence of venereal disease prior to or after entry into service is at issue. In the issue of service connection, whether the veteran complied with service regulations and directives for reporting the disease and undergoing treatment is immaterial after November 14, 1972, and the service department characterization of acquisition of the disease as willful misconduct or as not in line of duty will not govern.
(2) The simple drinking of alcoholic beverage is not of itself willful misconduct. The deliberate drinking of a known poisonous substance or under conditions which would raise a presumption to that effect will be considered willful misconduct. If, in the drinking of a beverage to enjoy its intoxicating effects, intoxication results proximately and immediately in disability or death, the disability or death will be considered the result of the person's willful misconduct. Organic diseases and disabilities which are a secondary result of the chronic use of alcohol as a beverage, whether out of compulsion or otherwise, will not be considered of willful misconduct origin. (See §§ 21.1043, 21.5041, and 21.7051 of this title regarding the disabling effects of chronic alcoholism for the purpose of extending delimiting periods under education or rehabilitation programs.)
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)
(3) Drug usage. The isolated and infrequent use of drugs by itself will not be considered willful misconduct; however, the progressive and frequent use of drugs to the point of addiction will be considered willful misconduct. Where drugs are used to enjoy or experience their effects and the effects result proximately and immediately in disability or death, such disability or death will be considered the result of the person's willful misconduct. Organic diseases and disabilities which are a secondary result of the chronic use of drugs and infections coinciding with the injection of drugs will not be considered of willful misconduct origin. (See paragraph (d) of this section regarding service connection where disability or death is a result of abuse of drugs.) Where drugs are used for therapeutic purposes or where use of drugs or addiction thereto, results from a service-connected disability, it will not be considered of misconduct origin.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 105, 1110, 1121, 1131, 1301, and 1521(a))
(d) Line of duty; abuse of alcohol or drugs. An injury or disease incurred during active military, naval, or air service shall not be deemed to have been incurred in line of duty if such injury or disease was a result of the abuse of alcohol or drugs by the person on whose service benefits are claimed. For the purpose of this paragraph, alcohol abuse means the use of alcoholic beverages over time, or such excessive use at any one time, sufficient to cause disability to or death of the user; drug abuse means the use of illegal drugs (including prescription drugs that are illegally or illicitly obtained), the intentional use of prescription or non-prescription drugs for a purpose other than the medically intended use, or the use of substances other than alcohol to enjoy their intoxicating effects.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 105(a))

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use