Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Should I file a CUE?

Rate this question


Tomahawk

Question

Background:  I injured my foot in service.  Was discharged after surgery failed to repair it.  I have had multiple surgeries at the VA which have made it worse. 

I was originally granted 0% in 2004 after fighting multiple years for even that.  I appealed and was bumped to 10% in 2005.  Once again I appealed and was granted 30% in 2007.  In their rating decision they state the "evidence  supports a severe left foot disability with included painful and limited motion, with radiating pain and nerve impairment to the foot and lower leg and postoperative scars." 

I was denied acquired flat feet "The VA treatment records documented extensive podiatry and other treatment for your foot problems.  However, the records did not demonstrate a current diagnosis of flat feet or pes planus.

I am currently in appeal for both of these issues. 

I have been going through all of my medical records and I'm wondering whether or not I should file a CUE.  For one thing they are stating they lumped the "nerve pain" in with my foot rating at 30%.  I have been clinically diagnosed by the VA since 2005 with CRPS/RSD.  They did a bone scan to confirm for the C&P exam. The C&P Exam Assessment stated "1.) Complex Regional Pain Syndrome ( Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy)  2.) Residuals of Post-Operative Surgery, Second Metatarsal Shortening, Arthroplasty of the Great Toe, Second, and Third Digit.  3.) Hallux Limitus Left Foot".  It is my understanding that CRPS/RSD should be rated under 8520 for peripheral nerve.  I should fall under the 60% rating as there is severe "marked atrophy".  My left foot looks like a skeleton, and my left leg has over an inch of atrophy.  Would this be a CUE based on the fact that they should have known to rate it separately under 8520 and instead lumped the "nerve pain" in with my 30% foot? Or is it on me because I didn't specifically file for it?

As for the flat foot.  The radiology report clearly states " Mild DJD of the first MTP joint is noted.  Interphalangeal arthroplasty is noted.  Pes Planus deformity is noted."  Is this report enough to claim a CUE on their findings of no "current diagnosis of flat feet or pes planus"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Thanks for the comments broncovet.

My claim is for bilateral flat feet.  Currently I am compensated 30% for "severe foot condition to include nerve pain".   My contention is that the "nerve pain" should have been rated properly as CRPS secondary to my "severe foot condition" as it affects my entire leg, not merely my foot.  And I don't know how the pyramiding works, but I am I believe the non SC foot having acquired Pes Planus should at least be evaluated by the VA as secondary to my SC foot.  However they have never given me a C&P exam for flat feet.

 

john999 I am currently awaiting a BVA hearing.  When I initially filed there was no way I could have afforded an IME/IMO.  And until recently it wouldn't have been an option.  I am now able to afford and have been in the process of contacting places trying to find one willing to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use