Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

In service fractures, Service connection

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Moderator

If you had a bone fracture, in service, you should read this "unofficial" interpretation of VA new policy:

The fact that the examiner cites proper healing of the fractures should have no bearing on whether service connection is granted for the fracture or not, as fractures are a chronic condition which are subject to service connection per the recent guidance put out in the April 2014 Veterans Service Center Manager (VSCM) Call Bulletin (don't bother looking for it, you won't be able to find or access it). However, given that the examiner cites the current disability is due to pes planus (which I assume is not service connected) it's likely you could be granted s/c at 0% for the historical fracture and denied pes planus and the residuals. The fact that you had fractures could certainly help your case on appeal if you were to assert that your pes planus was a result of the fractures sustained in service. Wait and see what happens... I'd fight this one tooth and nail, especially if there is no evidence of intercurrent injury... It seems pretty plausible that fractures, especially of the talus and cuneiform, could result in arch abnormality.

end quote from "other" website.

Notice here what is going on.  The VA is putting out "VSCM call bulletin's", to which we have no access.  Is this a "secret handshake".   I have particular dislke when govenment agencies spend taxpayer money in "secret".    I would also like to know what ELSE VA is hiding from us.    This informal interpretation from someone allegedly in the know at VA who chooses to remain anonomyous is a glimmer of light.  Of course, we were not supposed to get this information, and that is why I reposted it.  

Remember, Shinseki got fired over "secret waiting lists", that hurt Vets.  So, now there are "secret regulatory guidelenes" which are carefully guarded from Veterans.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
9 minutes ago, broncovet said:

I would send it to the Evidence Intake Center:

http://www.benefits.va.gov/COMPENSATION/mailingaddresses.asp

Okay so let me ask you this....My original claim and NOD has been with WACO but I do live in Texas.  Should I send it to VA?

Can I just fax the information?

Edited by Navy4life

US Navy Desert Storm Veteran
Proudly served my Country!!! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

You can fax it if you like, but I prefer snail mail, certified mail return receipt requested. You can also upload it with ebenefits, too.  But I like a paper trail for proof as I have been burned too many times with VA  "losing" my evidence.    A post office "Certified mail" receipt is good proof of mailing, when you keep a copy.    

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Okay I just faxed all the information because there is nothing on Ebennies that allows me to add evidence to my appeal.

I will follow up with a DAV rep on Tuesday at the VA hospital to also submit the documents to back it up.

thank you for your help!

US Navy Desert Storm Veteran
Proudly served my Country!!! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

BroncoVet;

I received confirmation of 74 pages being sent so I saved that in my records.  I figured that is just as good as sending it Certified Mail b/c either way I am stating I sent them documents LOL - again thank you for your help

Screen Shot 2016-01-17 at 5.38.25 PM.png

US Navy Desert Storm Veteran
Proudly served my Country!!! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 1/17/2016 at 5:38 PM, Navy4life said:

BroncoVet;

I received confirmation of 74 pages being sent so I saved that in my records.  I figured that is just as good as sending it Certified Mail b/c either way I am stating I sent them documents LOL - again thank you for your help

Screen Shot 2016-01-17 at 5.38.25 PM.png

IMO, snail mail with "better" copies, is a better alternative.  I would ALSO add "Signature Required" to the certified return receipt package.  The goal here is to ELIMINATE any and all possibilities of excuses that the VA can come up with... ALL of them!

Edited by HorizontalMike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

With all due respect, Navy, No.  Anyone can own a fax machine, but a receipt stamped by the post office (certified mail signed by person receiving the mail) is credible evidence the VA received your evidence.  Suit yourself, but if VA lost/destroyed as much of your evidence as they have mine, you would pay the $5 or so for a certified mail receipt.  

The "evidence intake centers" MAY prove better as they are specialized to scan in evidence, where RO's were specialized to loose evidence, however.    

A trip to the post office and $5 is probably the best insurance policy money will buy on VA losing or shredding your evidence.  If I would have bought "that insurance" 14 years ago, it would have saved me retro of at least $50,000 as VA said that I never sent in my claim  in 2002, which I know for certain is a big lie.   The VA said I sent in a claim "only" for hearing loss, and is fighting me to my death on their shreddergate shennanagin.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use