Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

NOD / DRO or TARP?

Rate this question


Billielea

Question

After almost a year of waiting on my C-File, I am starting my NOD without it. My question, which appeals method is better, DRO or TARP? Last year I was awarded 50% for PTSD reopened claim and had my 10% TBI rating decreased to 0% on an increase request. I originally filed in 2009 and was awarded the 10% TBI and denied PTSD. I filed a NOD at that time and wrongly assumed that they would call me in for another C&P and did not submit additional evidence. My appeal was closed in 2012 with no action. My last C&P notes on blue button state that I presented with same symptoms as 2009 C&P. Also, I realize the rules were different back then, but I had documented stressors (Combat Action Badge and serious incident reports). I plan on appealing the PTSD effective date and TBI rating. Please advise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Odd that they granted the TBI at first but denied the PTSD.

Since they did eventually award for PTSD, there could be a clear and unmistakable error (CUE)in the decision from the 2009 claim.

 "I filed a NOD at that time and wrongly assumed that they would call me in for another C&P and did not submit additional evidence. My appeal was closed in 2012 with no action."

Do you have proof they received the NOD. I just posted seconds ago how the IG caught Wichita VA manipulating NODs. The report is in pdf form and I have not read it all yet.

"My last C&P notes on blue button state that I presented with same symptoms as 2009 C&P." That is good evidence as it does support that their decision must have contained a CUE.

" Also, I realize the rules were different back then, but I had documented stressors (Combat Action Badge and serious incident reports)."

The main rule change in 2010 was that a PTSD diagnosis MUST come from a VA MH provider.

You were grandfathered in to the prior PTSD regs.

"but I had documented stressors (Combat Action Badge and serious incident reports"

TBI is a stressor and certainly CAB is as well. They should have conceded stressor in 2009.

" I plan on appealing the PTSD effective date and TBI rating. Please advise. "

If you can scan and attach here the 2009 decision, as to their Reasons and Bases part and the Evidence list they used in the decision, I can see if it has a bonafide CUE potential.

At this point, depending on what you posted here, it is definitely a CUE situation in my opinion.

But we need to see the actual words of the VA. Also scan the rating sheet too for us to see.....Cover your C file # and name prior to scanning it.

CUE claims can reap retro from a better EED that a vet would never get, unless they file a CUE claim.

Lots of info here on CUE.

"After almost a year of waiting on my C-File, I am starting my NOD without it. My question, which appeals method is better, DRO or TARP? Last year I was awarded 50% for PTSD reopened claim and " etc

What was the decision date? How much time do you have left within the one year NOD deadline?

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Berta, thank you so much for the response. I am out of town and cannot upload my 2009 decision. I should be able to in a couple of days. I will upload my latest C&P notes from blue button. The last paragraph of the last page is where the Dr. states "However, it should be pointed out that most of the symptoms the veteran described during today's MH examination certainly those common to a PTSD diagnosis- she also described during her 7/8/09 Initial PTSD examination, in Oklahoma City, three years PRIOR to her son's illness."

The only proof I have that they received the NOD is that the appeal is showing in ebenefits. I do remember getting a letter saying they received it. The appeal was closed 5/31/2011.

I do remember from the decision letter that the stressor was conceded but it stated that I lacked a PTSD diagnosis. Though I was told at an appointment prior to the C&P that I had PTSD. The C&P doctor stated that I was just stressed because I was pregnant. This is the main reason I am trying to get my C-file so that I see if these notes. I submitted the FOIA on 07/08/2015. Ebenefits: Estimated Completion: 11/29/2017 - 11/05/2018.

My latest claim was closed on 6/29/2015. So I still have a bit of time before I have to file the NOD.

Edited by Billielea
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The actual decisions will help us figure this out.

The C & P states:

 "If yes, list which portion of the indicated level of occupational and           social impairment is attributable to each diagnosis:              The Review TBI examiner has opined that "No significant residual              was found on today's evaluation. Her subjective complaints are due
CONFIDENTIAL Page 16 of 70
              to MH issues rather than TBI."
              100% of the impairment noted on this Initial PTSD report, is due to              PTSD and associated depression."

I hope others chime in her because that seems to me to say that they do not feel there are any TBI residuals.

But it also seems to indicate the PTSD rating should be higher,if that is solely the cause of the TBI residuals ,yet would have to raise to 70% which it didn't ,and only the decision will tell us how VA interpreted this report.

And it almost says( the way I read it), that the examiner found no residuals could be rated under TBI...Very odd...
 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Your Denied NOD, did you request a DRO Review or Hearing? Getting a continued Denial Decision so quick, I think you or your VSO-Rep requested the DRO Review Route. Not supplying N & M Evidence, big mistake.

Failing to supply the "Mandatory New & Material Evidence," to the RO immediately after requesting the DRO process, caused an Administrative Denial.

I take it, you didn't continue your appeal, to the BVA, right?

If you have Med Evidence backing up a worsening of your PTSD or any other possible SC Issue, it's time to file an FDC for the New SC, Secondary Issue or PTSD increase?

Don't set on your Evidence, get it to the VA Rating Dept and NEVER ASSUME anything, when it comes to your claim.

Semper Fi

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

After some digging, I was not able to find my complete original 2009 decision. I did however find my PTSD appeal decision from 2011 and the rating part of my 2009 letter. I must have separated the 2009 letter at some point to prove I had a 10% service connection, but didn't want them seeing the notes. I hope this is enough to maybe point a path. I can't express how much I appreciate what you guy's are doing here. I have never been comfortable sharing this stuff with anyone, To the point that I have been doing this with just my husbands help because I did not want to talk to a VSO that I don't know. But I see on here that everyone is helping everyone fight the same fight. Thank you very much! 

In reference to the previous questions: It appears I did file the DRO route, and no, I did not continue the appeal to the BVA. I actually found where I started to fill out the VA form 9, but I was so fed up with the OKC VA back then that I must have said "screw it". Big mistake on my part I know.

Appeal Decision 2011.pdf

Original Rating 2009.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use