Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

NOD and DRO process

Rate this question


Joe1766

Question

I recently received a rating on several disabilities 4 of which I have submitted as part of the NOD/DRO process.  When they review the claim does the DRO confine himself/herself to the issues that are listed on the NOD (4 items in question) or is it a de novo review of all the disabilities originally submitted?  I know that the DRO can downgrade a rating(s) as well which is concerning.......what is the risk/benefit analysis when it comes to submitting an appeal?

Edited by Joe1766
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Joe, what's Signed, Sealed and Delivered to your RO, by you or your VSO POA, is a Done Deal. The issues from your initial Award/Denial that you indicate on your NOD Filing, that your disagreeing with, are the only Focus of the DRO, during either the Review or Hearing Process.

I think you indicated that your recently filed NOD, was completed by your VSO POA, shortly after receiving your Award/Denial letter. Are you certain that a DRO "Review," was requested? If so, what does the MFIC, at the VSO's HQ, located at your VARO say about changing to a DRO Hearing?

This misguided "DRO Review Request" issue has to be addressed to the VSO's Office Director/Manager, not the same Rep that filed your NOD. Even if it can't be changed, and I don't think it can, you need to formally express your displeasure with the Service performed on your behalf.

I can't say I recall ever reading about Vet's unscrewing a NOD DRO Review request, that they subsequently change their minds on and want to switch to a Hearing. I don't think it can be done, after the fact.

If you haven't already, get your MANDATORY New & Material Evidence in to the VA, Send it US Mail, cert return receipt. Time is not on your side. At this point you have to assume your locked into a DRO Review, which could take place at any time. Failure to supply the N & M Evidence, GUARANTES an Administrative DRO Denial of your Appeal.

Spend some time reviewing VA's M21-1MR Part I, Chapter 5, Section B, about your NOD Filing. subsequent Chapters discuss the DRO's Duties and Authority's.

How about posting a Claims Timeline and redacted copies of your Award/Denial Letter? Would be helpful to see what the Rater's decision's were based on.

Semper Fi 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Joe.  File a NOD and make it clear, as follows:

(Let's assume you already filed on issues, A, B, C, F, and G.  You want to file on issues D, E, and H, which you did not dispute in your original NOD.  

Use the NOD form.  Tell them you dispute issues D, E, H, and, tho you filed a nod earlier, you wish to amend the NOD to include ALL issues.  I recommend you explain why you dispute each issue.  For example:

1.  Issue D (arthritis).  I am in dispute of this item because, even tho they did not find a diagnosis in my records, I am resubmitting Doc. Y's report dated 11-13-09 which confirms I have a diagnosis of arthritis and it shows up on the xray.  

2. Issue E    PTSD.  I dispute there was no "stressor".  Enclosed is a letter from my battle buddy, who was sc for the PTSD for the same battle I witnessed.  We had the same stressor.  

3.  Issue  H.  Kidney stones.   The decision stated there was no nexus to service.  However, I have enclosed an IMO from Dr. P, who stated that my kidney stones was at least as likely as not related to the bomb blast from military service and the shrapnel that remains in me. 

    While these issues were not disputed in the previous nod, I am within my rights as this NOD is well within the appeal period.  I dispute ALL issues.  

 

On the NOD form there is a place for you to check "all issues".  Make sure its checked disputing all issues.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I want to thank everyone for the great Information....working on all your suggestions and I will tell you how things evolve with updates if interested or for the help of future veterans with similar problems.  I spoke with another VSO rep in another office and he also stated you cannot meet with the DRO unless the DRO wants to have a meeting.  Now, I know, this in contrary to what has been previously stated here in this thread but I think you are getting a feel for what I (we) are up against......just received this e-mail from my initial VSO rep....

"So I am presuming that you are speaking of the “Specific Instructions of the NOD” page?  Currently your claim is not under appeal, rather there is a “disagreement” with the decision, for which the DRO is performing a “De Novo” review of the evidence for the 4 items specifically which you filed the NOD for.  You can request a hearing before the DRO, and I will do so using a VA Form 21-4138 simply requesting a “Face-to-Face” hearing, and signing it as POA on your behalf."

Maybe I am making headway, though, as several people pointed out it may be to late.

One other question when I told the VSO rep that I was submitting new claims unrelated to the NOD issues and he stated you can submit a new claim but not as a "fully developed claim", and that it will take longer for the new claim to be resolved with a pending NOD......Does this make any sense?

I  served 34 years on active duty, did my part, and now I need the assistance of the VSO and they are not coming through in a fashion I would have hoped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I filed an NOD (5 July 2016) and I am about to file a new claim in about a week.  The VSO rep said that if I file a new claim while an NOD has been submitted I should not expect a decision any sooner than a year out.  The VSO rep was suggesting the NOD slows the evaluation of the new claim.  One other question the VSO said you cannot submit a "fully developed claim" with an NOD pending; that does not seem to make any sense.  Thoughts anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 minute ago, Joe1766 said:

I filed an NOD (5 July 2016) and I am about to file a new claim in about a week.  The VSO rep said that if I file a new claim while an NOD has been submitted I should not expect a decision any sooner than a year out.  The VSO rep was suggesting the NOD slows the evaluation of the new claim.  One other question the VSO said you cannot submit a "fully developed claim" with an NOD pending; that does not seem to make any sense.  Thoughts anyone?

Absolutely incorrect!  I filed my NOD back in 2014. I filed an FDC claim Jan. 2016 and it didn't have anything to do with my NOD. In fact I received my DRO hearing notice the same month!  My FDC was completed in March 2016 without ever having anything to do with my NOD. The NOD didn't slow anything down!

Not sure who this guy is but his information is incorrect!

However, his opinion on at least a year for the NOD is about right. Most NOD's are anywhere from months to years to complete. You will need patience with the NOD. Sit back and wait but make sure you did everything you were told to do with the advice from your fellow Vetersns here. 

US Navy Desert Storm Veteran
Proudly served my Country!!! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
    • karlduerr earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use