Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Went For Tinnitus C & P

Rate this question


Question

Posted

I went for the tinnitus c & p at the V.A. hospital. After I drove 50 miles and parked a mile away I got in there and was informed I was instructed to come there for my travel pay only. I was given $8.00 and sent a couple miles away to a civilian audiologist. I was asked a few questions by a young trainee. It was totally not right after I had planned on what to say the correct way and wasn`t able to talk about how I got tinnitus. I tried to mention mortars, artillery, rockets, b-52`s, machine gun fire, tank fire etc. She wrote down exposed to missles. Then I was put in the hearing booth and told I had decent hearing and a report would be sent to the V.A Goodbye.

Cavman

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Guest rickb54
Posted

Caveman,

This dosen't sound like it went in your favor. But you can never tell.

I had an examiner tell me once that my knee was so messed up I would get an increase, instead I was lucky to keep my 10%.

Hang in there... if it is not favorable... well you know the drill

Posted

I was just turned down for bilateral tinitus. All they did was perform a hearing test and ask some questions. The tinitus is only mentioned in my SMR's twice during my final physical exams just before I got out. I had brought it up a couple times before that but they pretty much always told me nothing could be done and apparently left it out of my SMR's. I was a helicopter pilot exposed to the high whine of the engines daily. Also, the regular gun fire, grenade explosions and such 99% of all military are exposed to. I filed right after exiting service. Ill have to appeal and just hope for the best. Good luck on yours Cavman.

Posted
I was just turned down for bilateral tinitus. All they did was perform a hearing test and ask some questions. The tinitus is only mentioned in my SMR's twice during my final physical exams just before I got out. I had brought it up a couple times before that but they pretty much always told me nothing could be done and apparently left it out of my SMR's. I was a helicopter pilot exposed to the high whine of the engines daily. Also, the regular gun fire, grenade explosions and such 99% of all military are exposed to. I filed right after exiting service. Ill have to appeal and just hope for the best. Good luck on yours Cavman.

Nathan;

It sounds to me like they deni hearing loss, and tinnitus often, John is at the rating board now, but the way the Dr. for C&P wrote down for hearing loss, tinnitus and Menier's I have written down an NOD for John. This is how I started it it may help you and others also. I did a lot of research before I started the Nod.

I served on active duty in the marie Crop june of 1966 to June of 1970 and re-elisted October of 1970. My enistment exam dated Feb. 19636 indicate normal hearing there where the other exam noted in my records.

During my active duty I was exposed to loud noise from helicopters, pistols rifles, and machine gun, rockete and mortar attacks. I was also engaged in combat with the enemy while in active service as a helicopter arieal gunner. My Mo was helecopter hydraulics. and I exposed to jet engines and gun fire continually while in active service. I served in Vietnam for 12 months. My miltary discharge certifcate state that I recieved the Vietnam service medal and combat action ribbon and naval combat air crew wings.

I contend that my current hearing loss is the result of these noises while in active service.

I content that I was not advised on my rights to file a claim for hearing loss or tinnitus

My service medical records show that when I entered active service in 1966, the audiological evaluation stated pure tone thershold ,the service medical records state that in 1968 I had a mild hearing loss in both ears.re-enlistment exam in 1970 indicate mild hearing loss in both ears and so did the final discharge exam in 1972.While I never complained of the ringing in my ears it has persisted. With that benig said, I was not treated for tinnitus while in service but the onset of my tinnitus was in service.and tinnitus may not reasonably be disassociated from the noise exposure in service.and the neurosensory componet of my service connected hearing loss. my tinnitus is proximately due to the service connect sensorineural hearing loss. When I was examined for the pupose of separtion from service in 1972 the diagnois included high frequency hearing loss

Section 38 U.S.C.A. 1110 State service connection may be granted for disability resulting from disease or injury incurred in or aggavated by wartime servic. and section 38 C.F.R. 3.303(d) for tinnitus is established.

Posted
I was just turned down for bilateral tinitus. All they did was perform a hearing test and ask some questions. The tinitus is only mentioned in my SMR's twice during my final physical exams just before I got out. I had brought it up a couple times before that but they pretty much always told me nothing could be done and apparently left it out of my SMR's. I was a helicopter pilot exposed to the high whine of the engines daily. Also, the regular gun fire, grenade explosions and such 99% of all military are exposed to. I filed right after exiting service. Ill have to appeal and just hope for the best. Good luck on yours Cavman.

Nathan;

It sounds to me like they deni hearing loss, and tinnitus often, John is at the rating board now, but the way the Dr. for C&P wrote down for hearing loss, tinnitus and Menier's I have written down an NOD for John. This is how I started it it may help you and others also. I did a lot of research before I started the Nod.

I served on active duty in the marie Crop june of 1966 to June of 1970 and re-elisted October of 1970. My enistment exam dated Feb. 19636 indicate normal hearing there where the other exam noted in my records.

During my active duty I was exposed to loud noise from helicopters, pistols rifles, and machine gun, rockete and mortar attacks. I was also engaged in combat with the enemy while in active service as a helicopter arieal gunner. My Mo was helecopter hydraulics. and I exposed to jet engines and gun fire continually while in active service. I served in Vietnam for 12 months. My miltary discharge certifcate state that I recieved the Vietnam service medal and combat action ribbon and naval combat air crew wings.

I contend that my current hearing loss is the result of these noises while in active service.

I content that I was not advised on my rights to file a claim for hearing loss or tinnitus

My service medical records show that when I entered active service in 1966, the audiological evaluation stated pure tone thershold ,the service medical records state that in 1968 I had a mild hearing loss in both ears.re-enlistment exam in 1970 indicate mild hearing loss in both ears and so did the final discharge exam in 1972.While I never complained of the ringing in my ears it has persisted. With that benig said, I was not treated for tinnitus while in service but the onset of my tinnitus was in service.and tinnitus may not reasonably be disassociated from the noise exposure in service.and the neurosensory componet of my service connected hearing loss. my tinnitus is proximately due to the service connect sensorineural hearing loss. When I was examined for the pupose of separtion from service in 1972 the diagnois included high frequency hearing loss

Section 38 U.S.C.A. 1110 State service connection may be granted for disability resulting from disease or injury incurred in or aggavated by wartime servic. and section 38 C.F.R. 3.303(d) for tinnitus is established.

Posted (edited)

Nathan-there is a Stay proceeding on "bilateral" tinnitus claims- did they mention that in the decision?

Even so -do you mean they didn't even rate one ear for tinnitus?

"The tinitus is only mentioned in my SMR's twice during my final physical exams just before I got out" This is evidence that is more than what I usually see in tinnitus claims-

it often is not in the SMRs at all.

Did they actually consider that evidence from your SMRs?

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Posted (edited)

Appeal the tinnitus denial. Even though we had evidence stated in the SMR's, my husband's claim was denied. That's when I copied and charted all the hearing test scores found in his records over the years, and submitted the appeal. They granted it from the date of the "new evidence" as they referred to his records. Now we've got a CUE in to the RO for the earlier effective date of claim for hearing loss, which was the first day of his retirement, since the information was in his SMR's all along.

I think tinnitus is one of those claims many RO's deny just to see if the veteran will come back at them with an appeal.

Edited by Vicki
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use