I read in the the past in books or other sources, and it seems that there are fully developed cases and claims within the VA whereby the intake of medication (opioids/pain killers in particular) can supposedly play a substantial roles in an accident with a subsequent injury and disability. While it is true that the medication's prescription warns about such impairment one can not stop living a life or perform basic and necessary tasks (for what there is no substitute) due to such medications.
It seems reasonable that whether one is riding a motorbike or operating a machinery and then is victimized by a debilitating accident for which one could argued that the intake of pain killers played a substantial role in the precipitation or occurrence of the accident, that then one could claim that the injury and disability caused by aforementioned accident shall be service connected as well.
There are many questions afloat from this argument, mainly questions of principles and cause/effect, for instance: in these circumstances, while the burden of the proof lies with the veteran it would not be possible for the VA to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the intake of medication did not play a role in the accident.
Could anyone point me out to previous cases or scenarios of this nature, please? How straightforward or convoluted such cases can be?
Question
tk3000
Hello Folks,
I read in the the past in books or other sources, and it seems that there are fully developed cases and claims within the VA whereby the intake of medication (opioids/pain killers in particular) can supposedly play a substantial roles in an accident with a subsequent injury and disability. While it is true that the medication's prescription warns about such impairment one can not stop living a life or perform basic and necessary tasks (for what there is no substitute) due to such medications.
It seems reasonable that whether one is riding a motorbike or operating a machinery and then is victimized by a debilitating accident for which one could argued that the intake of pain killers played a substantial role in the precipitation or occurrence of the accident, that then one could claim that the injury and disability caused by aforementioned accident shall be service connected as well.
There are many questions afloat from this argument, mainly questions of principles and cause/effect, for instance: in these circumstances, while the burden of the proof lies with the veteran it would not be possible for the VA to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the intake of medication did not play a role in the accident.
Could anyone point me out to previous cases or scenarios of this nature, please? How straightforward or convoluted such cases can be?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
9
8
4
2
Popular Days
Sep 2
4
Aug 30
4
Aug 23
3
Aug 24
3
Top Posters For This Question
tk3000 9 posts
jfrei 8 posts
Buck52 4 posts
Berta 2 posts
Popular Days
Sep 2 2017
4 posts
Aug 30 2017
4 posts
Aug 23 2017
3 posts
Aug 24 2017
3 posts
Popular Posts
jfrei
Get the police report ASAP so we have something to work to give you a better answer. That's were the Willful misconduct determination will come from when the VA does their own LOD or just to rule out
tk3000
That is a good point. I tried to address it at leas partially in my initial post. The label does not necessary says that one can not operate motor vehicles, it says that one has wait to assess t
Posted Images
25 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now