Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

"deemed Denied" Question

Rate this question


vaf

Question

If a veteran doesn't receive any specific information regarding a claim that falls under the "deemed denied" category, then what does this mean for the mandatory VCAA notice regarding any claims falling under that category?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Vicki

If you get a VCAA for a specific claim then it seems to me you should get all the benefits of the claims system on that claim including all noticies of appeal rights etc. To not notify you that this type of claim has been denied violates the spirit and law of the VCAA. This just follows logically in my mind. If you don't get a VCAA on a claim then you may fall below the radar. It is important to get a VCAA letter for each claim you file. I know this does not apply to CUE but what about Section 1151?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a veteran doesn't receive any specific information regarding a claim that falls under the "deemed denied" category, then what does this mean for the mandatory VCAA notice regarding any claims falling under that category?

Understand that the court held that any claim not specifically mentioned in a decision letter is "deemed denied".

It doesn't matter whether the VCAA letter mentions the claim or not. (The fact that this decision is contrary to the CFR rules is irrelevant. It's now a part of the case law about appeals.) Is it right? NO. But, neither was the Kelo v. New London correct about Eminent Domain. It's the new "living Constitution" court crap we're supposed to adopt with enthusiasm. Bulls**t. It's anti-Constitutional, but if we tolerate it, it'll stick.

Ralph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the court just gutted all the meaning out of the purpose of a VCAA letter. How can the veteran be advised as to what he/she needs to prevail in a claim when they aren't event told the claim's been denied or why? The VCAA letter is supposed to be specific in telling the veteran what is needed to prove a claim.

I guess I don't understand, am I missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep thats exactly what the court did. So all the advocates will now have to automatically file a new NOD with every decision that does not mention the other injuries or illnesses claimed. Further they will have to provide "new and substantial" evidence or they (the VA) will just vacate the claim yet again. The same 60 day window will apply, so the vacated claims must be re-filed within that period, and in any future rating if not mentioned yet further evidence will have to be supplied... again and again

Do we really wonder why we hate the VA? I mean not necessarily the individuals, but the whole darn system?

As far as the comittee goes though, I personally believe thats a dead issue. They'll issue some "findings", and they'll fail to get any further support from the Democratic House and Senate. They may get some minor things updated, but I thik that the whole stalking horse has been pretty well shod.

The VA and congress are not our friends, but I think out of simple partisanship the dems will slap down any move made by the republican committee... just out of spite if nothing else. Well just have to see. I certainly think that some changes will occur, just dont forsee any major ones either for or against us. The VA is constantly re-defining CFR 38 without the committee anyway. Plus the stays, the appeals, its all just a process to get people to die or quit. And the sad fact is that the VA wins hands down simply by playing the percentages that they themselves have leveraged against the vet.

I've got LOTS of 4 letter words for the VA raters and their system. That doesnt include the average VA employee though.. like the normal doctors and nurses etc. Once you get free of the rating system, and get rated at 100% (enourmous effort that it is) then it all pretty well smooths out... or it has for me anyway. Even the raters seems to have given up. I wrote a one page letter explaining that they had made a mistake with my SMC and that I should have been rated 1/2 a level higher than I was explaining why I thought so with ref to CFR 38 included. 21 days yes 21 DAYS later I received the new rating and a week after that the back-pay. Go figure.

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use