Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • fundraising.jpegGive a financial gift to help with the upkeep of HadIt.com. HadIt.com is NOT a non profit. Gifts are not tax deductible, they are just gifts. 

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Our picks

    • So, my lawyer sent an IME w/ IMO and filed a supplemental claim solely for IU on March 20.

      It was closed on March 25, and va.gov just states claim closed and nothing more.

      Hopefully, I get good news.
    • Thanks for the responses. I am filing a new claim but will continue pushing the NOD. My new question is it stated in law or statute that if during the claims process the VA finds conditions that could possibly rate service connection that was not originally filed for, the VA will “invite” the veteran to file the claim on the claims form. Reason I ask is that my private DBQs, NEXUS letter, and even the VA nurse examiner's DBQs lists bilateral upper radiculopathy as present. If it is written in statute or official guidance it might qualify as a CUE. Just looking at all angles. 
    • Everyone needs to read our stories so they can try to avoid these screws by the va...
      Thank you, everyone contributes, good or bad, all of our stories will help others, and yes, they have been stated by others for ages, over and over, but we just get depressed, and the time turns into years as they screw us..

      Welcome to the department of Veterans Affairs!  I can honestly say, "been there, done that".  

      Even after winning my tdiu in 2017, it was back to the drawing board as VA hornswaggeld my effective date.  (but of course).  

      I finally won my tdiu effective date in Feb. 2020, 18 years after I first applied!!!  

      Here is how they managed to drag mine out 18 years:

      1.  They never adjuticated my decison until 2009, where they called it "moot".  

      2.  I appealed, said it was not moot because it could result in an earlier effective date and SMC S under Bradley vs Peake.  The judge agreed with me, and ordered VARO consider me for extra schedular TDIU, under 4.16 b.  

      3.  The VARO piddles with  the remand for 3 years, and hoped I wouldnt notice.  I noticed and raised cane until they adjuticated it.  (denied of course).  

      4.  Finally, after the baord denied again, I hired a lawyer, in 2014, and appealed to CAVC.   

      5.  The lawyer won a remand, got an IMO and I won tdiu in 2017.  But at the wrong effective date, even after 15 years.  

      6.  I hired another lawyer, Chris Attig, and appealed the effective date, and he won a remand for effective date.  Trip 2 to CAVC.  

      7.  Mr. Attig won a remand, and advised me to get another IMO.  

      8.  The board awarded my earlier effective date in Feb. 2020.  

           So, I do have advice fighting VA for TDIU, they fought and fought and I hung in there and won it all.  

      ADVICE:  Dont count on VA, they could easily throw your fax in the trash.  Follow up!  
    • "Keep in mind that due to the nature of the digestive system, VA would most likely combined your conditions and pay you at the higher rate to avoid pyramiding".    That is one of my main gripes.  They are only listing the GERD with hiatal hernia and ignoring the rest of my gastric issues such as the gastritis which I also had in service.  I included it in my 2007 request for increase and again in 2019.  The info from the civilian dr that stated I had the gastritis with H pylori was not even provided to the examiner in 2007, nor did he have my VA health records. The 2019 request was based on an EGD I had AT THE VA in Jan 2019.   I filed for an increase 6 Mar and they did an ACE on 27 Mar and downgraded to noncompensable on that date.  The only reason I was thinking CUE:  38 CFR § 3.326 - Under Examinations  it states (c) Provided that it is otherwise adequate for rating purposes, a statement from a private physician may be accepted for rating a claim without further examination".  
    • Enough has been said on this topic. This forum is not the proper forum for an attorney and former client to hash out their problems. Please take this offline
  • Advertisemnt

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
ardodd

Improper handling of 1999 VA Compensation Claim

Question

Improper handling of 1999 VA Compensation Claim

I will do my best to present this in a short and respectful manner. I will do my best to truthfully represent all facts and evidence as it was presented in 1999 VA Claim. It is therefore I am seeking help in identifying any missing documents, missing evidence, non compliance of VA Regulations, etc...

I will post the photo copies of the record on my C-file which I received in 2015. I will present the Claim as it was filed through the local VSO in Farmerville, Louisiana County/Parish: Union

 

Subject:

VA Compensation Claim for Albert Dodd

Dated: 15 June, 1999 

Copy of Claim Submission: ** ( All files are in PDF format and saved to my Google Drive ) ** ( View Only ) **

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1d9HHYJHe3fgLuItJ6INugPqWLAZDg1am

VA Claim submitted on: 15 June 1999

VA Claim Received on: 18 June 1999 ( Dept of Veterans Affairs New Orleans, LA )

ATTACHMENTS:

VA Form 21-526 Pg. 7

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bHb95IPMv6DGTVftK2qLeoYo-rv1miAv

VA Form 21-526 Pg. 8

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1cWw-3sJygTIhnCgrRZFl4B7XSXC0nnE-

VA Form 21-526 Pg. 9

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1P8tgJ0rcUz8MJoInHEMLuv06raHckdZK

VA Form 21-526 Pg. 10

https://drive.google.com/open?id=15P1YoMfREici-kHFHgbz1TttyuzCMLim

Authorization and Consent Included: 

VA Form 21-4142 Pg. 1

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YXTaDasjAdrfXN8abclQX9a_8v7kM5G4

VA Form 21-4142 Pg.2

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ux9UvrEplp2tTkKc6xrZsMCkUSi2e0z4

 

** ( Notes of Interest ) **

Supporting Evidence Attachments:

1) Certified copy of DD 214

2) Copy of Discharge Account Summary ( Severance Pay ) ** ( My Certified True Copy from SMR ) ** 

3) Copy of Findings of the Physical Evaluation Board ** ( My Certified True Copy from SMR ) **

4) Copy of SMR's to support S/C Claim

 

** Physical Evaluation Board Decision **

Pg. 1

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ius0W2ZDp-Ls1_fiQxoqfxRWBSor_viU/view

Pg. 2

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fYqy9fh6kjD0-cXAfK_T6KGoyszVeJNP/view

Pg. 3

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DsAwqqLecFc6C_HsZghIaZ7D33E37Qf6/view

Pg. 4

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UJOIGk1DJuNKNR-RRgfXIswVjWLex_jF/view

Pg. 5

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1h6GgoGlDbJ9sEOT7V1CXorWXEKB5rxG4/view

 

All Evidence and Supporting documents where sent in along with the Authorization and Consent ( VA Form 21-4142 ) for Release of Medical Records on June 15, 1999

 

**** Dept of Veterans Affairs New Orleans, LA ****

Intake of Evidence for VA Claim for Compensation for Albert Dodd

Dated: 18 June 1999

**** Timeline for Review of Evidence and Decision ****

June 18, 1999 VA Claim Received

 

June 25, 1999 VA Claim Reviewed

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LaYkJdHDmZ9ofzA8CJD7ZTCNwOqzVX9N

 

July 08, 1999 Rating Decision ( R.M. LaCOMBRE, Rating Specialist )

Rating Decision Pg. 1

https://drive.google.com/file/d/16cS_DJ6QCut61LVj-jbzolQghHh4StDF/view

Rating Decision Pg. 2

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MfG-kcASP_2lruDY22eSMGCgKbI6x-_b/view

Rating Decision Pg. 3

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pUJXAHT_Zguk0WR2R4xTEi8c0EAXLgHs/view

 

July 10, 1999 Compensation and Pension Award **( VA Form 21-8947 ) ** Signed into record

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JP-MXHlCsjsGlL9M9qP09XSK_OJJC14P/view

 

July 12, 1999 Notice of Decision mailed out  **( Cover Sheet ) **

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OG7fNoJWMzF79NQ1AI04Z-wz5QrspY7g/view

 

**** Questions for CUE ****

1) Duty to assist **( Did not attempt to help get copies of Hospital stay )**

2) Duty to assist **( Failure to assist by not scheduling a medical exam for current medical condition(s) )**

3) No Development Letter **( Failure to Notify Veteran of any further evidence needed to substantiate Claim )**

 

I Albert Dodd do swear that all information is correct and included. If you or someone you know has information that would help me in getting the VA to correct this wrongful Decision please post your comments. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Anyone else having problems with the unreads and also with posting here in last 2-3 days?

I sure am.

There were 4 denied claims in the 1999 rating.others can chine in on the last 3 but I will focus on the Bilateral 

# 1 AND  2  Do not raise to the level of CUE.

I assume # 3 meant the VA did not consider this as a 'well grounded claim'.

After the VCAA, our DTA rights were enhanced. Still that meant we needed to provide (or make sure the VA obtained) any relevant other records.   and/or info that a well grounded claim could be adjuducated on.

Page one of the  rating decision states that you were diagnosed with bilateral -patellofemoral syndrome and "received severance pay", and then  states 

"He has not submitted any evidence of any current residual disability.”

The VA did stamp this form as received on June 18,1999 and the 21-526 was also stamped as received that date.

When did you send them medical proof of your current residual disability within the appeal period for that specific claim? What was the VARO date stamp on it?

Do I understand that you still receive the 10% for this disability? Or did the statement as to lack of reiduals cause them to reduce you to "0" for this specific disability?

Have you  formally claimed an increase in the 10% rating?

Do you expect a C & P exam in the near future, per any VA notice, on this same disability?

I thought you mentioned that in the other thread.

If so, that could change everything....maybe...was this for a higher rating on the knee condition ,

and that might change   the 1999 decision....but which would still require a formal CUE claim on the 1999 decision being Cued.

I had to blow up the rating sheet and the dates looked like 1996, or 1998 but I seem to think the date was 7/8/99..up top to the right of the page .

20 days -less the weekends in June ,July 1999-for a decision???? heck it often takes that long for a 21-526 to get out of the Mail room into the actual VARO offices.

Obviously something was wrong with this decision....

a violation of 38 CFR. 4.6,if you have proof of this:

'When did you send them medical proof of your current residual disability within any deadline they gave you  for that specific claim? What was the VARO date stamp on it?"

 

 

 

 

Edited by Berta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

What happened to the Hip pre service aggravated by service claim?  No mention?

Were the knee problems in any way the cause of the MVA for the back problem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

@Berta that is what I have been trying to say ( maybe not in the correct way ). What you see is the complete Claim for 1999.

1) Medical Evidence: 

 a) VA Form 21-4142 I requested help with obtaining medical records from 1993 In Hospital stay. 

 b) VA Form 21-526 I highlighted in Red Pg. 10 Block #40 Remarks: **( Vet is willing to be examined at VAMC - Shreveport if scheduled by DVA )**

**Notes of Interest**

There was no medical evidence submitted by myself. I asked for help in obtaining a copy of the medical records using the VA Form 21-4142

 

8 hours ago, ardodd said:

I was not working and no health insurance so I could not afford to get a medical opinion from a doctor stating my medical conditions. That is the reason for requesting a exam to show a current medical condition.

8 hours ago, ardodd said:

Hopefully i am not confusing you or anyone else. Because I know you and others will say that it is our responsibility to get a medical records related to my claimed disability and submit it.

Am I at fault for not being able to afford to get a medical opinion? 

Am I at fault for not getting the medical records from 1993 and submitting them?

And that is exactly what I see that the VA said and did. 

Did the VA request or send a letter notifying me of further evidence needed to substantiate the claim? NO

Did the VA request a copy of the medical records? NO

Did the VA assist in helping me get the medical evidence for a current medical condition? NO 

Facts supporting that the VA did not fulfill its obligation under 

§ 21.1032 VA has a duty to assist claimants in obtaining evidence.

 

Reasonable doubt

If the VA would of fulfilled the Duty to assist, the claim decision would of been delayed 60 days to allow for a response. A Second attempt then would of took another 30 days.

If the VA would of fulfilled the Duty to assist, they should of sent a development letter notifying me that I needed to submit medical records to support my claim. If I was not able to obtain medical evidence then the VA should of scheduled me an exam for a current medical condition.

**Claim was Decided in 23 days with weekends and holiday included**

 

Conclusion

The VA Regional office in New Orleans, LA. wrongfully Denied the 1999 Claim for Compensation. 

Violation of Due Process Rights 

Violation for Failure to Duty to Assist

Violation for making a Decision without following Protocol

When the VARO New Orleans specifically disobeyed Protocol by Denying a medical exam to prove current medical diagnosis. They disobeyed protocol by not fulfilling the Duty to Assist in obtaining medical records using reasonable efforts. Then the VA disobeyed protocol by not notifying me of any documents needed to approve my claim.

Although the VA rating Specialist made reference to (NWG not found on last exam) the VA failed to identify the date and medical examiner report used in making their decision. 

It is therefore that without a reasonable doubt that the VA Rating Specialist and VARO New Orleans, LA if at least as likely would of used reasonable effort to follow protocol. The outcome would of been in favor of the Veteran. And it is as likely as it is as likely not that if the VA would of followed protocol in aiding the Veteran to obtain the evidence necessary to substantiate their claim for service-connected disability.  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
1 hour ago, Lemuel said:

What happened to the Hip pre service aggravated by service claim?  No mention?

@Lemuel I have never had any pre service injuries. All injuries where incurred during active duty and post service.

1 hour ago, Lemuel said:

Were the knee problems in any way the cause of the MVA for the back problem?

@Lemuel in my non-medical opinion the knee's are the basis for improper alignment of all muskoskeletol conditions. 

When looking at the knee's it is conclusive that any kind of injury can result in misalignment of ankle - hip - back. My knee's where not properly aligned after being injured. 

The misalignment of knee's caused the hips to rotate out of balance. Thus it is connected to the in service disability.

The misalignment of the hips caused misalignment of the spine. Thus it is connected to the in service disability.

**Note**

Although I was injured in a chemical plant explosion which caused the back condition. Reasonable doubt is established if the service connected disability in any way shape or form from my knee's misalignment caused my hips and back to become misaligned as a result.

The VSO filed them as service connected. And it was not until my Appeal was Denied this year that i realized that it was listed as service connected and not secondary to the service connected disability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I am only asking these questions so I do not waste others time on things that can not be changed.

My Questions are:

1) Is it an actual CUE if the VA does not assist the Veteran **(Prior to 2000 Duty to Assist)**?

2) Is it an actual CUE if the VA did not do a Development of Claim **(NO Notification Letter - NO request for further documents)**?

3) In my Claim for 1999 the VA Denied it for Not Well Grounded. The VA did nothing to help assist in my Claim and in 23 days time sent it back to me, stating I had not provided any evidence of any current residual disability.

When I look over the whole Claim what I get from it is that the VA is telling that if you can not get your own evidence. And send it to us so we understand that you were injured in service - Discharged because of it - Have a current medical diagnosis that connects it to your claimed conditions. That we as the VA do not have the time to help you even though you were discharged with it. 

I feel as if the VA slapped me in the face and told me to go do their job so all they have to do is look and say: Yes ( Discharged with it ) Current Disability ( bla-Bla-Bla ) They are connected/not connected. So go back home and do our job and send us a Completed Claim and send it back. Then we will let you know if you are or are not Approved for your Claim.

Of course i feel if that would of been the case when I did all that and sent it back in they would of sent it back stating that my evidence did not support my claim so try again.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Glenndawson100
      Hi,
      I received me letter today, and I was denied. This time the error is clear. The Doctor who preformed my ACE examine said my initial diagnoses was Epilepsy then proven to be pseudo seizures. Initially at the ER (and my week long hospitalization after) and for about one month after I was diagnosed with PNES and not epilepsy. However since I kept experience both petite mal and grand mal episodes and then Epileptic medication treatment began to WORK, I was diagnosed with Epilepsy. My doctor in my civilian record's back dated the diagnoses to the May when the first event occurred. I've attached my letter; you'll see that they received my Neurologists note about my treatment since may and then confirmed my Diagnoses on 04DEC2019. Pseudo seizures are only mentioned in my records between May2019-June2019. I think this VES contracted doctor saw the diagnoses labeled in may but didn't review(or care) to look at the LETTER AND NOTE DATED BY MY DOCTOR ON 05DEC2019 WITH MY CONFIMRED DIGNOSES AND THEN UPLOADED TO THE VA ON 24DEC2019. Opinions? HLR or do I wait 3 months to see my VA Neurologist, as I no longer have Tricare to see my UCHealth DR., and have him confirm the diagnoses... I'm only 5 months away from all this stuff lasting a year and getting really fed up with the VA. My first denial was also because of the phraseology used by my ER and Hospital doctors after the first event in may. Hint that's why I had my specialty neurologist who had been seeing my since June confirm my Epilepsy diagnosis... uuuhhhggg.

    • By Jamezam
      I've decided to take a crack at creating a CUE and Benefit of the Doubt failure for a claim that was originally denied in 1988, but finally approved in 2014. And, I currently have a pending NOD on the effective date of said claim.
      I would be so grateful if anyone could view my CUE and original claim denial. My question is this, am I on the right track with my CUE? I have been developing my CUE using language based on an actual citation by the BVA awarding a CUE to a veteran for the same condition and circumstances in which mine was denied and quoting Title 38. It's so easy to get confused with all of the information out there.
      So any advice will be greatly appreciated. I have uploaded my CUE in development phase and original claim denial.
       
       
    • By Glenndawson100
      Hi there, Recently actually yesterday the 21st of February the VA gave me notice that my supplemental claim had been decided and that they had sent out the letter that morning as well (meaning the decision was actually made on the 20th). This of course prompted me to check Ebenefits, where I saw no change in my rating. I'm currently rated at 40% for other issues. And in the past Ebenefits updated almost instantly leading me to believe that this supplemental claim was denied. I originally submitted my Epilepsy claim back in august, it was denied about 4 months later due to conflicting phraseology given by one of my doctors (mind you i still have a diagnoses of Epilepsy with 15 witnessed Grand Mal seizures at this point). Once i got the original decision letter I contacted my County VSO's office and set up an appointment. After they reviewed everything they we surprised that my claim was denied as it has a clear nexus and on top of that falls under the conditions; that if they manifest within a year its considered service connected (I separated 02/01/2019, first seizure onset was 05/25/2019). They did review the 112 pages of evidence from my civilian doctors and did see the conflicting phraseology. They told me that if I could get my Neurologist to just confirm my diagnoses and say i was and have been under treatment since 05/25/2019 that we could submit a supplemental claim since that's the fastest route. So that's what we did. That brings us to now. Under the standards for Epilepsy I was looking at a single rating of anything between 80%-100%. An 80% from 40% would have resulted in something Close to 90%. While i'm holding out, since in either case the retro pay (if my claim was awarded) would be greater then 20K that the additional signatures required are slowing down Ebenefits from updating, but as in most cases if the letter has sent and Ebenfits doesn't updated, 90% of the time you Claim/Supplemental/Appeal is denied. ( I mean correct me if I'm wrong). Whats the moral of the story? No matter how much evidence you have to support you the VA will be the VA. I'm lucky that I'm rated for other conditions so that I can at least have the VA help me cut down on the costs of treatment for Epilepsy, but it would have been nice to have it service connected so that I wouldn't have to wait months on months for Neurology appointments since I don't have priority. If any one has any information for me that might help moving forward, I'm all ears as once my letter is received and upon reading of the denial ill be filling an appeal.
    • By Jash
      I’ve done the VA claim-bit on my own. I don’t  know if this is a mistake or not. 
      I went to a c&p exam recently. I left somewhat confused. I never had a doctor tell me directly that she was recommending an increase as well as IU. She said though it was ultimately up to the rater. I don’t have her report because 30 days has not passed. I was at 50% for ptsd and 10% hearing loss. During the appointment the c&p doctor quoted a couple other reports where VA doctors I’ve seen at various clinics said that I had “long term, chronic and severe...” (Don’t want to get into the what). I find myself now obsessing if: 
      1. The c&p dr was lying to about her recommendations; 
      2. The c&p dr was telling the truth about the recommendations;
      3. The rater will decrease my %
      4. The rater will increase my%
      Ultimately it boils down to: How much weight does the rater put into the C&P dr recommendations? Could I really get IU if that dr did actually recommend it? what are the chances?  The IU could help a lot, I’ve not been able to work much the past few years. 
  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • So, my lawyer sent an IME w/ IMO and filed a supplemental claim solely for IU on March 20.

      It was closed on March 25, and va.gov just states claim closed and nothing more.

      Hopefully, I get good news.
    • Thanks for the responses. I am filing a new claim but will continue pushing the NOD. My new question is it stated in law or statute that if during the claims process the VA finds conditions that could possibly rate service connection that was not originally filed for, the VA will “invite” the veteran to file the claim on the claims form. Reason I ask is that my private DBQs, NEXUS letter, and even the VA nurse examiner's DBQs lists bilateral upper radiculopathy as present. If it is written in statute or official guidance it might qualify as a CUE. Just looking at all angles. 
    • Everyone needs to read our stories so they can try to avoid these screws by the va...
      Thank you, everyone contributes, good or bad, all of our stories will help others, and yes, they have been stated by others for ages, over and over, but we just get depressed, and the time turns into years as they screw us..

      Welcome to the department of Veterans Affairs!  I can honestly say, "been there, done that".  

      Even after winning my tdiu in 2017, it was back to the drawing board as VA hornswaggeld my effective date.  (but of course).  

      I finally won my tdiu effective date in Feb. 2020, 18 years after I first applied!!!  

      Here is how they managed to drag mine out 18 years:

      1.  They never adjuticated my decison until 2009, where they called it "moot".  

      2.  I appealed, said it was not moot because it could result in an earlier effective date and SMC S under Bradley vs Peake.  The judge agreed with me, and ordered VARO consider me for extra schedular TDIU, under 4.16 b.  

      3.  The VARO piddles with  the remand for 3 years, and hoped I wouldnt notice.  I noticed and raised cane until they adjuticated it.  (denied of course).  

      4.  Finally, after the baord denied again, I hired a lawyer, in 2014, and appealed to CAVC.   

      5.  The lawyer won a remand, got an IMO and I won tdiu in 2017.  But at the wrong effective date, even after 15 years.  

      6.  I hired another lawyer, Chris Attig, and appealed the effective date, and he won a remand for effective date.  Trip 2 to CAVC.  

      7.  Mr. Attig won a remand, and advised me to get another IMO.  

      8.  The board awarded my earlier effective date in Feb. 2020.  

           So, I do have advice fighting VA for TDIU, they fought and fought and I hung in there and won it all.  

      ADVICE:  Dont count on VA, they could easily throw your fax in the trash.  Follow up!  
    • "Keep in mind that due to the nature of the digestive system, VA would most likely combined your conditions and pay you at the higher rate to avoid pyramiding".    That is one of my main gripes.  They are only listing the GERD with hiatal hernia and ignoring the rest of my gastric issues such as the gastritis which I also had in service.  I included it in my 2007 request for increase and again in 2019.  The info from the civilian dr that stated I had the gastritis with H pylori was not even provided to the examiner in 2007, nor did he have my VA health records. The 2019 request was based on an EGD I had AT THE VA in Jan 2019.   I filed for an increase 6 Mar and they did an ACE on 27 Mar and downgraded to noncompensable on that date.  The only reason I was thinking CUE:  38 CFR § 3.326 - Under Examinations  it states (c) Provided that it is otherwise adequate for rating purposes, a statement from a private physician may be accepted for rating a claim without further examination".  
    • Enough has been said on this topic. This forum is not the proper forum for an attorney and former client to hash out their problems. Please take this offline
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines