Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ms KNG

Rate this question


KNG

Question

Hello,

I recently filed a claim (2017) for Hallux Valgus (bunion) and was granted the 10% service connection that this condition warrants, because I had it surgically removed (status post left Bunionectomy, retained) while on Active duty (1997).  

I ETS’d from from the Army in 1998.  The treatment records of the condition/surgery is noted in my military records.  Although many details of my ETS physical are fuzzy after all these years, I do recall discussing the surgery, the bunion etc with the physician who did my exam.

Note that I filed the 2017 claim only after another veteran told me that I was entitled to an award for this....so I filed the claim and it was granted.  

My question is, that I thought that I was entitled to this years ago when I ETS’d in 1998. However, it seems nothing came of my mention of this at the exam....and as I said before the details of the exam are fuzzy....but I seem to recall being told that it was not awardable.....so was there a mistake somewhere?  Was there something I needed to do at that time? I assumed the exam was to note any potential service connected issues. Did I drop the ball, or the examiner? How can I figure this out?

If I was entitled to an award in 2017, why was I not entitled in 1998?

I hope that I’ve clearly articulated the issue/concern.

thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1
  • Lead Moderator

Your effective date, in most circumstances can not be earlier than the date you first applied.  To get benefits from 1998, you would have had to apply back then.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

First off your question is horrible.This should say your title, not your question. Your question is fine, but your title is not going to encourage many people to look at your question. You need to read the parts about how to post a question. Again this should state title, not question.  Tbird states that you need some substance in your question so that people will look into it. Again this should state title not question.

This is posted on most every page I have seen - 

How to get your questions answered.

All VA Claims questions should be posted on our forums. Read the forums without registering, to post you must register it’s free. Register for a free account.

Tips on posting on the forums.

  1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ ...
  2. Knowledgable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title ... 

 

On 4/8/2018 at 8:28 PM, KNG said:

I had it surgically removed (status post left Bunionectomy, retained) while on Active duty (1997).  

I ETS’d from from the Army in 1998.  The treatment records of the condition/surgery is noted in my military records.  Although many details of my ETS physical are fuzzy after all these years, I do recall discussing the surgery, the bunion etc with the physician who did my exam.

Did you get some type of letter from VA after your ETS? I think it would discuss the conditions you applied for disability. I got mine and I think they screwed up. I have a situation like you do.This is what Berta said about a similar situation 

If a vet gets a NSC rating that subsequently becomes a SC disability....it is common sense to consider the disability should have been SC all along.My last CUE award was based on that fact.

I suggest you repost all this with a much better question. That away more people will read it and respond.

Edited by kanewnut
Used term question when term title was correct

testing my signature

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

As broncovet pointed out  no claim no award.

This is Unfortunate for the Veteran if we only knew to file our claims for any Service Related Medical Condition After leaving the military...your not the only one  Most of us fill that category fairly well my friend.

I understand what you mean here This would apply if you had filed a claim back then for this condition.

However, now that VA has  the VCAA as of Nov of 2000  (Veterans Claims Assistance Act) could help but since you never filed a claim  how can they help you or assist you?

so to answer your question as to Clear and Unmistakable Error...no errors has been committed.

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

KNG

You may want to file a ITF  (Intent to file) this starts your Early Effective Date and gives you a year to gather up evidence of record before you actually apply for the claim, Just remember to file  before the ITF Date expires.

 

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I wanted to point out that any questions a Veteran comes here to hadit to ask is not horrible.

We will do our best to find answers to all/ any Veterans Questions.

   All Veterans are welcome to ask any Questions related to the VA, Be that be Claims or HealthCare.

 

 I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice,
therefore not to be held out for liable

BUCK!!!

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
3 hours ago, Buck52 said:

I wanted to point out that any questions a Veteran comes here to hadit to ask is not horrible.

We will do our best to find answers to all/ any Veterans Questions.

   All Veterans are welcome to ask any Questions related to the VA, Be that be Claims or HealthCare.

Thanks Buck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use