Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Attorney Fee Eligibility Determination

Rate this question


8up4life

Question

Hard to believe no one ever asked what this is or how it works.

Kept in the dark about EVERYTHING, until it is complete, despite the fact that an attorney fee has absolutely no bearing on what your final ratings are.  

Any idea how long VA will force me to look at this status?

Edited by 8up4life
update
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

BVA only establishing service connection.

There is nothing for me to appeal except the ratings and EED that will be coming from the RO.

They got me unnecessarily waiting 120 days despite the fast letter.

VA Perpetuating the Backlog.

 

Edited by 8up4life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Another way to possible speed it up is to talk to your local congressman or senators office it’s what I did. I never even spoke but two times on the phone to his VA rep for him office and they submitted a congressional inquiry, its one way to fast track it and if you have a hardship as well. But if not the congressional inquiry puts alittle push behind it not sure if your in Delaware I can give you the number to Senator Coons office. I found it on google I just put my “state” quotations  and then “Senator” “email” should do the trick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 11/6/2018 at 8:58 AM, SgtStelmo said:

Hello 8up,

I think you are correct when you state they are waiting for the 120 days to lapse.  That is because the Order is not a Final Order until the appellate period has closed.  Even though one might have a favorable decision the VA can choose to appeal.  (This only applies to cases at the CAVC.).  The CAVC is the first level where the proceeding is 'adversarial', and the VA is formally the opposition.  

Why would a Vet appeal a favorable finding of fact to the CAVC? The Court would declare it moot as there is no case or controversy. (38 USC §7262)

<<<(This only applies to cases at the CAVC.)>>> It also applies to the CAFC and the SC. (38 USC §7292). 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 11/12/2018 at 12:17 PM, asknod said:

Why would a Vet appeal a favorable finding of fact to the CAVC? The Court would declare it moot as there is no case or controversy. (38 USC §7262)

<<<(This only applies to cases at the CAVC.)>>> It also applies to the CAFC and the SC. (38 USC §7292). 

True but in my case the appeal was won they said it was permanent, but the award said no dea benefits. Which is why I appealed and the RO saw the mistake and change my award letter to P and T  with DEA ChampVA benefits. Appeal complete 21 days just last June 2017. I’m just giving an example of why you may appeal a win at the BVA...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Technically, that isn't an appeal to the BVA. It is a disagreement with the BVA's conclusion of law. That's what your advocate is for. When a decision comes out, we have three working days to object and tell them what they screwed up. They fix it without an appeal. In fact, there's a little widget after the decision in VBMS after a rating decision we click on to say we agree with it. If we don't agree, we contact our Change Management Agent and ask them to contact the rater to ask if s/he's illiterate and can't decypher the BVA decision. Remember, they depend on the M 21 to write the decision. They're virtually brain dead without it.

While I understand most of you do not have proactive VSOs, they are notified via VBMS that the decision has been promulgated. Under no circumstances can you file a NOA to the CAVC from a BVA decision to obtain DEA. The BVA Judge doesn't "award" a decision. They award an entitlement via a finding of fact and a conclusion of law. The RO is then tasked with writing it up. If the RO refused to give it to you in spite of what the BVA decided, you'd file an Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus to the CAVC asking for relief. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I heard only VSO's have access to the VBMS and can review decisions. Attorneys can't.

The ratings were done on Aug 28th and the attorney fee has been withheld since Sept 10.  

Right now I am just waiting for a rating decision and retro deposit which should have came at the same time the attorney fee was withheld.

I am being told that my case is still sitting in the attorney fee coordinators office waiting for transfer back to the AMC for final authorization.

Just sitting there over 2 months waiting to be transferred. 

Edited by 8up4life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use