Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Vcaa Question Ref. Private Medical Records

Rate this question


vaf

Question

I've got a question about the extent to which the VA is required to help the veteran obtain information from private sources.

The veteran has obtained an independent medical opinion from a physician to support a claim. The physician has treated the veteran for several years, and states so in the IMO. Then, the VA had a specific question on that IMO, but never notified the veteran or the physician, who in writing invited inquiries should anything else be needed. Then, the VA (in this case the Board) denied the claim, specifically referring to the IMO, but stating an apparently minor point of confusion (whether the muscle spasms referenced occurred in the cervical spine, the lumbar spine, or the extremities), which could have easily been cleared up if the veteran or the physician had been notified. In fact, the veteran first heard of it when he received the Board decision.

This all occurred after the implementation of VCAA in 2000. No VCAA notice, and apparently, this conflicts with 38 CFR, Part 3, § 3.159, as well as M21-1 in the discussion referencing developing evidence from non-Federally held agencies (i.e., private medical records). The veteran completed numerous release of information authorization forms, which the VA claims to have never received.

In contrast, the VA is citing 38 C.F.R. 4.2, which says that if VA has a medical examination it regards as inadequate for decisional purposes or in which the diagnosis doesn’t match the data, VA is to return the examination as inadequate, seek another exam or clarification of the initial exam from the VA provider, i.e. this has been interpreted to refer only to VA exams, where VA can compel a re-examination.

Am I wrong in believing that the VA violated the VCAA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

Got it, Vike, I understand.

I'm wondering how common it is for the VA to negotiate for a voluntary remand to avoid a claim going before the Court.

I never heard of it, but that doesn't mean much. I'm not an SO.

Have you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Berta or anyone, have you ever had the VA offer to voluntary remand anything pending before the Court? Have you ever heard of such a thing?"

no-never-

On the VCAA question-

"Does a letter asking for medical provider names and addresses, which is information already sent to the VA many times, without being labeled "VCAA" and without being more specific as to the information needed from these providers, in fact, constitute legally acceptable formal VCAA notice"

No- a proper VCAA Notice comes before the initial denial (they are violating that one all the time)

A proper VCAA letter states in underlined or italisized letters a statement specific to the claim as to what exactly is needed.

A proper VCAA letter also has an election notice with it that the veteran makes an election on and then returns to the VA.

The VARO is also supposed to enclose pamphlets explaining with the VCAA Notice what the VCAA is all about.

(the Gov printing office apparently printed up thousands of these-I do not know of a single vet who ever got one-and they wonder why I griped to the IG about this stuff)

Jangrin posted a real VCAA letter here sometime ago and it should be found under the search.

If you read BVA remands - the violations are rampant and the BVA points out the errors and states what the VCAA letter must contain.

I am glad Jangrin posted a real one. I have never received a real one in 4 years.

The VBM has considerable info on this aspect of the DTA regs and cites Pelegrino V Principi.

I complained to the main office of my POA as they kept saying I received proper VCAA notice.

I enclosed copy of VBM NVLSP statement as to what a legal VCAA notice was, pointed out that this was part of my remand due to violation of VCAA, and my POA shut up and stopped trying to say I was wrong.

They have countless remands due to this lack of knowledge over simple VA case law and regs at the BVA. I sent them some hyperlinks -it is disgraceful that these vets have put all this time in thinking they might get a decision from the BVA but most of these cases are remanded due to VCAA violations.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"...VBM NVLSP statement as to what a legal VCAA notice was..."

Berta, is this available somewhere on the net? I saw the NVLSP website article on VCAA, is that what you're referring to?

Also, can you provide the link to Pelegrin V Principi? I'm having trouble finding it for some reason.

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jangrin
"...VBM NVLSP statement as to what a legal VCAA notice was..."

Berta, is this available somewhere on the net? I saw the NVLSP website article on VCAA, is that what you're referring to?

Also, can you provide the link to Pelegrin V Principi? I'm having trouble finding it for some reason.

Thanks!

Vicki,

Here is the download of an actual VCAA letter that my husband recieved from the VARO. This was one of three VCAA letters he recieved on his initial comp. claim.

vcaa4.doc

Hope this helps,

Jangrin

Edited by jangrin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pelegrino V Principi-I APOLOGISE! I spelled the name wrong-

Pelegrini V Principi-

Here is a OGC Pres op on this case:

http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:mAYclP...=1&ie=UTF-8

And here is the actual CAVC decision:

http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:u-N1Ck...=4&ie=UTF-8

I scanned and attached here page 1339 from the 2006 Edition of the VBM-

The VBM has considerable info on the VCAA-

I got this idea from Terry Higgins and owe him a big thank you on this-

I sent copy of this page to the BVA, the VARO and my vet reps to show that my VCAA rights were violated-

The BVA and maybe the RO got it- my vet reps needed more explanation-

Pelegrini- the VA cannot deny a valid claim withou proper VCAA notification-

this is the law but they do it all he time and we claimants have to make sure they do not get away with it .

scan_VBM_page_1339.rtf

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta, I'm getting a blank page in Wordpad when I open the scanned document. I have trouble opening wordpad documents for some reason, is there something else I can do to open this?

Thanks everyone for all your help. This will come to a head pretty soon, I'll let everyone know what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use