Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Denied Left foot 2013....Filed NOD before year deadline...Sc left foot 2018...Do I have CUE?

Rate this question


Lena

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

We cant tell from that.  However, did you (or can you) appeal the 2018 decision, and dispute the effective date?  Cue is mostly about effective dates, which it sounds like your issue.  

Also, did you submit new and relevent evidence, and, if so when?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I don’t know if I can dispute earlier effective date.  After my NOD was granted, I received retro back to 2013.  But I was wondering if I can dispute earlier effective date back to 1986 when I was first diagnosed with left foot disability in MEB report.

And no I didn’t submit new and material evidence with my NOD.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Yes, you can appeal the effective date, provided that, the decision awarding benefits was within the past 12 months.  

Other than a timely appeal, your choices are:

1.  To do nothing, and you will net 0 retro.  

2.   To file a Cue, but we would need more information to know if that would succeed.  However,  I think you can make a good case for cue, when they deny then award the same benefit sought, if they used the same evidence.  

3.  However, a reopening due to 38 cfr 3.156 is possible, if you submitted new and relevant evidence.  

So, those are your choices:  Nothing, appeal, file CUE, reopen under 3.156.  And, you have choices of which appeal route, (HLR or supplemental)  hearing or no hearing, laywer or no lawyer.  

Of these choices, my recommendation (but it would be better if I read your file):

1.  File a Nod if possible (within a year of decision).

2.  If its past a year, then your choices are 3.156 (reopen), file a supplemental claim, or CUE.  

If this is possible, I suggest professional representation (a lawyer).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Ever since I got my NOD award decision, I’ve been researching and researching on what to do next.  A friend of mine told me to come to this site.  I’m glad I did....thank you so much for giving me some suggestions on how to proceed.  I don’t know which way I’m going to proceed, but at least, I have better insight...again thank you for your PROMPT response!!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Another Question:

If I decide to go CUE route(they denied original claim and granted same benefit sought using same evidence)...what law and regulation would I use? And also, if I won...how would that give me more retro? 

I have already received retro when they denied me on my original claim and won my NOD on that same claim

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 9/26/2019 at 4:02 PM, Lena said:

 But I was wondering if I can dispute earlier effective date back to 1986 when I was first diagnosed with left foot disability in MEB report.

any retro pay can only go back to when you first filed the claim not the date in service that you got the diagnosis.

For example if you were diagnosed in 1986 but did no file until 2000, 2000 is the earliest date you could possibly get retro too. The one caveat is if you filed within a year of getting discharged. those veterans can get retro to the day after their discharge date. I am not sure when that rule was implemented but based on my reading of your post it may not apply to your situation.

23 hours ago, Lena said:

If I decide to go CUE route(they denied original claim and granted same benefit sought using same evidence)...what law and regulation would I use? And also, if I won...how would that give me more retro? 

I have already received retro when they denied me on my original claim and won my NOD on that same claim

We would need to see ALL your decision awards and denials and the DBQ;s.

Redact them and post.

if you chose not to post, then no one here can really give you an on-point answer.

The reason is that a CUE, unlike a NOD, must be based on documented fact that is unarguable by a reasonable person. That means that the actual words matter. Not your opinion of them. Not the line you think is important but the entire document you are trying to attack.

We humans like to read things to our liking, and that does not fly with a CUE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use