Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question On Va Hearings

Rate this question


Berta

Question

http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:pm60w...=1&ie=UTF-8

I might be missing something but does a claimant have the right to submit an additional claim at a hearing?

I thought hearings were focused solely on the last SOC ,or denial, or whatever and the vet can present oral argument with additional evidence as well as witnesses-etc etc -this stuff in this m21-1 link-and a separate issue can potentisally be raised but I thought- only if it was probative to what the hearing was actually for.

Do vets go to hearings with additional new claims? If they do does the VA then do something with these new claims at the hearing?

Thanks all.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Chief Petty Officers

Berta brought this up because I am getting ready to go to a hearing on Feb. 06, 2007.

I did bring up some things at my last hearing that the judge could not discuss. The judge did take note of this and when he reviewed my case he mentioned them. The judged pointed out that the claims were already started ans some of them had been overlooked. He asked that these claims be looked in to. He stated that they were out of his jurisdiction but he did mention that the cases did need to be worked. He stated that if they were worked properly that they could present a bearing on my case that he had.

MY CASE CAN BE READ HERE: http://www.va.gov/vetapp05/files1/0502690.txt

This is the discussion that we are having: Hearing Coming Up, Depression Secondary

http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?show...amp;#entry39014

I have a lot of issues pending and I need serious help. Berta is trying to help me but this is a big case. I am going to be submitting a lot of things at my hearing this time. I was told last time that I could not even talk to the judge about anything that was not on the docket, because it did not pertain to my case at hand. I ended up turning in some things that got put into a temporary file and never were worked. I think that If I had turned these things in to the judge, He would have had used some of what I put in. If anyone can help me with my case I will greatly love it. Thanks, Dean

I HAVE BEEN ON THIS VETERANS SITE SINCE THE BEGINNING AROUND 1997, This site has had many changes. All of the changes have been for the good of the site. T-Bird does her best to keep Veterans informed. This is the best Veterans Discussion Board on the Internet. I wish I was able to be on here as much as I used to be. The amount of post that it shows that I have made does not go back to when the site started. T-Bird had no idea that this site would ever get as big as it has grown. She is a big inspiration for a lot of Veterans. If it were not for this site, a lot of Veterans would not have ever had their claims won..QUOTEHelp a Veteran any time that you can. They need to be informed of the claims process...

E-mail.. dean@help-a-veteran.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume the hearing grew out of the Remand? I am only guessing- I cant tell-

If so-the remand stated that it appeared the RO had not obtained your SSA records yet- these records could be critical to your case.

Do you have positive proof that the RO has these records by now?

In all of the issues in that remand this is the one that concerns me the most- TDIU-it appears that the issue was raised in 1999.

The BVA could not hold jurisdiction :

"Consideration of TDIU in this case would necessarily involve

consideration of the veteran's other service-connected

disabilities (nerve residuals of a left inguinal hernia

repair, a back disorder and a right wrist disorder), which

are not here on appeal. Therefore, the Board concludes,

based on the VA General Counsel Opinion referred to above,

that it does not have jurisdiction over the issue of

entitlement to TDIU. That claim is accordingly referred back

to the RO for appropriate action."

I am assuming that this is still a pending issue and they have not denied you yet for TDIU?

Since you have a diagnosis of depression and the medical statements from doctors that state this disability is due to your service connected disabilities-

I hope that you have sent copies of this evidence (the medical statements) to the RO in support of your TDIU claim.

As long as they gave a good medical rationale and are professionals in the field of psychiatry or psychology- this is excellent evidence of total unemployability due to SC disabilities.

I think the judge could not accept additional evidence that you brought because he did not hold jurisdcition over it- such as the TDIU issue.

You are right Dean-I never had a hearing and wanted to clarify this-with Vike-

I think Vike meant - give a DRO anything you got at an informal conference-but a hearing resulting from a BVA appeal sticks mainly to the case that was before the BVA.

You mentioned somewhere that you had 25 claims-

You only need one formal claim filed for TDIU-and you seem to have the evidence-for that-

medical statements that state your depression is caused by your SC disabilities.

I guess I am confused because it appears to me that this hearing results from the remanded conditions-and not TDIU.

In the last decision you got, did VA defer the TDIU issue or did they say they considered you but gave reasons why they did not award it?

I also have to assume that you Nodded this if they mentioned TDIU but denied it and that the TDIU claim is still pending-

I would-if I were you-go to the VA Iris system at their web site and send VA a brief inquiry as to the status of your TDIU claim.

Also I am thinking -maybe they never got the SSA records or even the medical evidence you mentioned here to support this claim.

I see the State of Georgia represents you-

I think they could easily check this too for you--if you dont want to use the Iris system-for

the status of the TDIU claim- and

whether the VA has those medical statements to support this in your c file.

All the other issues could be rendered moot with a TDIU award- but you could pursue any of those other issues if they could eventually lead to SMC.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use