Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Did I Do The Right Thing?

Rate this question


Cammy

Question

I have a relative that is a WWII Vet that never filed for disability. He now is diagnosed with asbestosis. Having read here that so many of you have taken control of your own cases, I helped him fill out the VA claim form, get his DD 214, and documentation from his primary care provider (civilian). We sent his claim package and recieved a letter from the VA saying that they have recieved his claim and will process it.

In talking to the local AMVET rep he tells me that I screwed up. According to the AMVET rep "...the VA will eat him up because he does not have representation". The rep told me that no service organization will take his case and represent him to the VA after the claim is filed. So basically this guy is taking on the VA by himself.

So did I screw up? Is it ok to have filed the claim (this vet could die tomorrow) without a VSO? Is the local VSO just blowing smoke? This VSO has my power of attorney and has filed paperwork for me in the past. Having said that, I sometimes have a better idea what is going on than this guy so my confidence level with this guy is not sky high. To be brutally honest I get the impression that he is paid on commision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure I know what you mean by "just calling" and there is no specific form for filing a terminal expedite. What I was suggesting would be more along the lines of a medical statement which provides evidence of the veteran having "terminal status" or maybe even "his prognosis is poor" if the physician is not willing to state that he is terminal.

You could submit this statement with a simple letter from the veteran requesting that his claim be placed on terminal status due to the severity of his disabilities. Now is the time to ask, if anything comes to mind go ahead and fire away. I'm going to do some research on a VA Memorandum that was released a few years ago which provided the Naval MOS's and their likely exposures to asbestos. I'll relay the information to you so that you can use this in combination with your request for a VA examination to be completed ASAP.

I would also highly recommend that he not complete any medical releases to submit to VA. If you have already submitted the private treatment records, this should avoid delays in the processing of his claim. If any new pertinent medical evidence is received, I would highly recommend that you submit it yourself.

After the VA has established a likely exposure to asbestos in service, the only thing that remains is the examination and subsequent rating decision. The memorandum I am speaking of should allow them to avoid any requests for records from the service department which would cause delays in the processing of his claim.

I'll get back to you soon. Shoot me a message if you have questions though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I brought this over from another website.

carlie

One way to potentially speed up the process is for a member of the veteran's healthcare team to write a letter requesting expedition of the claim based on financial or medical hardship (in some cases, both may apply). Keep in mind that most veterans submitting claims want them to be processed as soon as possible and many ask for expedition of their claims. It may be helpful to specify the nature of the financial or medical hardship for which you are requesting expedition, I'd also try to get a social worker involved.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something you might ask the VA to do is assist you in obtaining the logs associated with the various craft he served on. If you attempt to obtain them yourself and cannot but can get ahold of some of theothers who served on the ship, statement in support of claim stating that asbestos was used etc.. would not be harmful to the claim, and can provide credible evidence.... just look up the ships and see f you can email some of the people who served on them, most ships have a website dedicated to her and her crew....

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amvets is just blowing smoke. As attorneys do, NSO have their bottom feeders. Sorry but Amvets vets that definition in my opinion. They are simply trying to put fear into people cause they know that if the vets attorney bill passes they will be the first to go as far as membership and donations go. Once again just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I'm going to do some research on a VA Memorandum that was released a few years ago which provided the Naval MOS's and their likely exposures to asbestos"

I posted this here years ago and it should still be at hadit-

This is the MOS list re: Navy that has VA PIES on top of it-

I have asbestos vet - Navy-

His inservice MOS (dont depend on DD 214 MOS for these types of claims) puts him into two areas that VA considers Probable /high exposure.Per the VA PIES list.

His cancer has no known etiology but for asbestos exposure.(we documented that with evidence)

A civilian with same cancer won millions from an asbestos company.(we attached the evidence of that)

AFter service this vet had no occupation whatsoever that exposed him to asbestos or carcinagenics.

(documented that)

I knew the vet didnt smoke but I asked him if-while aboard ship in the Navy- if he smoked 2 thousand cigarettes a day.

He never smoked in the Navy or after it.

I accessed considerable info on his ship-

It had so much asbestos in it they had to send it to coast of Iran and sink it. It could not feasibly be cleaned up of asbestps and re-commissioned.

sent that info to VA also-

And I printed out VA's own recognition of asbestos in Navy ships- sent them that too

and the whole PIES list and the actual occupations this vet had.

He didnt even know he had this potential claim.

His vet rep asked me to help with a 10% Sec 1151 claim he had-

the vet rep was shocked at the potential of the asbestos claim-

100% and SMC is possible- these claims take much time for the VA co-ordinator on that list you mentioned. It helps if the vet details their MOS as to exactly what duties they performed aboard ship.

Oh yeah- dont fail to mention too the sleeping racks were usually all under asbestos covered piping that was throughout the whole ship.

It also pays to search the ship at the BVA to see of they awarded any other vet who served on same ship and claimed asbestos.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Berta for the heads up on the PIES.

The vet I am helping had several ratings (MOS,AFSC) while in the Navy. Of that list he has one probable and two minimal according to the PIES list. OK so now the VA can say that there wasn't significant exposure while in service right? I'll be doing some research on the vessels he served on next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use