Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Going for an increase for PTSD. Will VA look at my other disabilities?

Rate this question


mcarter985

Question

Good morning!  I'm thinking about going after an increase for my PTSD rating (currently at 50%).  If I do this, will the VA look at my other ratings for possible decrease?  For background, I'm 73, I've had my ratings for about 9 years (Tennitis at 10%, Heart Disease at 60%, and PTSD at 50%.  Total is 80%.  Thanks in advance for your help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
6 minutes ago, flow1972 said:

Just going to point out that the OP is 73 YO.  Isn't there a law that states that cannot reduce after age 55?

Answered my own question..55 is a "protected status" from future periodic exams.  But if you file a claim, they can review anything they want; but there is always the "long period of rest" argument in cases where you aren't working.

 

Regardless, Tinnitus wouldn't be re-evaluated because it's already at it's lowest level; and I'd guess that your heart issues have likely not "improved" with age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 3/6/2023 at 1:07 PM, flow1972 said:

Just going to point out that the OP is 73 YO.  Isn't there a law that states that cannot reduce after age 55?

No law that says that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 2/27/2023 at 7:42 AM, Whodat said:

I agree with Shrek. Look it's like this. We all at some point was afraid of something or someone. I bet that you were afraid day1 in basic training. But we have overcome our fears.

Go for it. I don't think that you will get a reduction but if one is proposed, appeal it. You will still get paid the same and we all know how long appeals take. 

 

If va followed its own recommendations, we wouldn’t have to appeal and wait, wait, wait.

Just now, Stayfocus said:

If va followed its own recommendations, we wouldn’t have to appeal and wait, wait, wait.

Sorry…Regulations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 minute ago, Stayfocus said:

If va followed its own recommendations, we wouldn’t have to appeal and wait, wait, wait.

Sorry…Regulations.

Not saying not to pursue. I’m saying pursue with overwhelming objective evidence!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
2 minutes ago, Stayfocus said:

No law that says that

38 U.S.C. 501 Section 3.327 Reexaminations

General. Reexaminations, including periods of hospital observation, will be requested whenever VA determines there is a need to verify either the continued existence or the current severity of a disability. Generally, reexaminations will be required if it is likely that a disability has improved, or if evidence indicates there has been a material change in a disability or that the current rating may be incorrect. Individuals for whom reexaminations have been authorized and scheduled are required to report for such reexaminations. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section provide general guidelines for requesting reexaminations, but shall not be construed as limiting VA's authority to request reexaminations, or periods of hospital observation, at any time in order to ensure that a disability is accurately rated.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)

(b) Compensation cases -

(1) Scheduling reexaminations. Assignment of a prestabilization rating requires reexamination within the second 6 months period following separation from service. Following initial Department of Veterans Affairs examination, or any scheduled future or other examination, reexamination, if in order, will be scheduled within not less than 2 years nor more than 5 years within the judgment of the rating board, unless another time period is elsewhere specified.

(2) No periodic future examinations will be requested. In service-connected cases, no periodic reexamination will be scheduled:

(i) When the disability is established as static;

(ii) When the findings and symptoms are shown by examinations scheduled in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section or other examinations and hospital reports to have persisted without material improvement for a period of 5 years or more;

(iii) Where the disability from disease is permanent in character and of such nature that there is no likelihood of improvement;

(iv) In cases of veterans over 55 years of age, except under unusual circumstances;

 

(v) When the rating is a prescribed scheduled minimum rating; or

(vi) Where a combined disability evaluation would not be affected if the future examination should result in reduced evaluation for one or more conditions.

 

The VA is notorious for not following this rule, but unless a new claim is related to an existing condition by being a secondary condition or the claim is requesting increase of an existing condition the above rules should be applied.

  Meaning, no periodic future examinations should be requested for "static" conditions, "permanent" disability, or when a veteran's age is over 55...EXCEPT UNDER UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES.  So..there isn't a law that they cannot reduce after age 55, but there is one that they aren't supposed to request exams where they "could" reduce after age 55 unless there is an "unusual circumstance"...and you'd better believe I'd be asking them to provide documentation on what that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
19 minutes ago, flow1972 said:

38 U.S.C. 501 Section 3.327 Reexaminations

General. Reexaminations, including periods of hospital observation, will be requested whenever VA determines there is a need to verify either the continued existence or the current severity of a disability. Generally, reexaminations will be required if it is likely that a disability has improved, or if evidence indicates there has been a material change in a disability or that the current rating may be incorrect. Individuals for whom reexaminations have been authorized and scheduled are required to report for such reexaminations. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section provide general guidelines for requesting reexaminations, but shall not be construed as limiting VA's authority to request reexaminations, or periods of hospital observation, at any time in order to ensure that a disability is accurately rated.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501)

(b) Compensation cases -

(1) Scheduling reexaminations. Assignment of a prestabilization rating requires reexamination within the second 6 months period following separation from service. Following initial Department of Veterans Affairs examination, or any scheduled future or other examination, reexamination, if in order, will be scheduled within not less than 2 years nor more than 5 years within the judgment of the rating board, unless another time period is elsewhere specified.

(2) No periodic future examinations will be requested. In service-connected cases, no periodic reexamination will be scheduled:

(i) When the disability is established as static;

(ii) When the findings and symptoms are shown by examinations scheduled in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section or other examinations and hospital reports to have persisted without material improvement for a period of 5 years or more;

(iii) Where the disability from disease is permanent in character and of such nature that there is no likelihood of improvement;

(iv) In cases of veterans over 55 years of age, except under unusual circumstances;

 

(v) When the rating is a prescribed scheduled minimum rating; or

(vi) Where a combined disability evaluation would not be affected if the future examination should result in reduced evaluation for one or more conditions.

 

The VA is notorious for not following this rule, but unless a new claim is related to an existing condition by being a secondary condition or the claim is requesting increase of an existing condition the above rules should be applied.

  Meaning, no periodic future examinations should be requested for "static" conditions, "permanent" disability, or when a veteran's age is over 55...EXCEPT UNDER UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES.  So..there isn't a law that they cannot reduce after age 55, but there is one that they aren't supposed to request exams where they "could" reduce after age 55 unless there is an "unusual circumstance"...and you'd better believe I'd be asking them to provide documentation on what that is.

👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use