Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Rate this question


Lemuel

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Has anyone seen a case on "VA fraud against a veteran;".  Appears in a profile of an attorney who sent me a letter for representation of my appeal of my BVA decision.  Bray v McDonough, Docket no. 23-1587 in case you want to follow the case.  I will update on this thread.

Edited by Lemuel
left out VA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
18 minutes ago, pacmanx1 said:

There are times when the CAVC will say BS readjudicate the veteran's appeal. 

See: Stegall v West 11 vet app 268 (1998)

Problem in my case, it was not in the form of an order.  More of a recommendation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
6 hours ago, Lemuel said:

Problem in my case, it was not in the form of an order.  More of a recommendation.

Your CAVC appeal is just beginning, and you still have some time to go, your attorney hasn't even written his brief. Sorry Stegall doesn't come into play until after your CAVC remand order, but you can ask your attorney about the BVA memorandum. Did the BVA follow their own remand order? 

Edited by pacmanx1

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

There is a cavc case, which I posted years ago, where the VA "fraudently" modified the Veterans exams so that they were less favorable.  I can almost remember the (CAVC case's name) as I seem to recall his last name sounded like a motorcycle.  (maybe a motorcyle brand, Honda, Harley, etc) But its not coming to my noggin.  

VA was not punished for the fraud, and its not completely clear the Veteran even won!  It may have been a remand.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
2 hours ago, broncovet said:

There is a cavc case, which I posted years ago, where the VA "fraudently" modified the Veterans exams so that they were less favorable.  I can almost remember the (CAVC case's name) as I seem to recall his last name sounded like a motorcycle.  (maybe a motorcyle brand, Honda, Harley, etc) But its not coming to my noggin.  

VA was not punished for the fraud, and its not completely clear the Veteran even won!  It may have been a remand.  

I will try to find it doing a docket search.  Your post reminded me that I can search by attorney name.  I would also try Harley.  Knew one in the Navy.

My fraud is the refusal of the VAHA to provide evidence to the VABA and to me for a second opinion on the readings (reports) which were incomplete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Search for Harley found a possible result but the case documents are not able to be downloaded.  There are two possible.  James R. Harley is the most likely in Harley v Nicholson, vet app. 05-1037 because he was awarded attorney fees on a remand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
9 hours ago, pacmanx1 said:

Your CAVC appeal is just beginning, and you still have some time to go, your attorney hasn't even written his brief. Sorry Stegall doesn't come into play until after your CAVC remand order, but you can ask your attorney about the BVA memorandum. Did the BVA follow their own remand order? 

The BVA did not follow their remand orders in the previous decision apparently thinking they were mute because I was granted TDIU back to 1985 in 2020 with an EED 2 years before my extra-schedular claim that was not processed by the Los Angeles VARO.

The examination orders were not as remanded but were limited.  For example, the order for the wrist did not include the articulation of the thumb metacarpal with the carpal joint. 

The TBI examination was abbreviated in the order and was not within 50 miles plus would not provide housing for the extended stay necessary to do a full examination during COVID.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use