Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Rate this question


Lemuel

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Has anyone seen a case on "VA fraud against a veteran;".  Appears in a profile of an attorney who sent me a letter for representation of my appeal of my BVA decision.  Bray v McDonough, Docket no. 23-1587 in case you want to follow the case.  I will update on this thread.

Edited by Lemuel
left out VA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

VA fraud against vets is SOP for the VA.  If you are claiming big retro expect them to use every dirty trick in the book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Among the 1994 letters is a "next of friend" claim for other veterans.  Since ask by a social worker in 1986, when ask to help a couple of veterans in a PTSD group with their claims, I have been an activist for veterans with organic brain syndromes from focal TBI, blast concussion TBI, cerebral malaria and other organic causes of brain syndromes including epilepsy.

If an attorney takes this case they may try to put together a class action case since the CAVC has not certified a means of doing that.  It is a wait and see situation.  Several attorneys are looking at the case.  Some will be waiting to see the RBA before deciding.  Others may ask me for the documents I referenced in my briefs and motions to the BVA including motions to vacate previous decisions under 38 CFR 20.1000.  I am hoping the one with experience in winning a case of "VA fraud against a veteran;" will take the case because of their experience.

If anyone wants the contact information of the law firm let me know here.  If they take the case, I will provide it individually to interested parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
1 hour ago, Vync said:

@Lemuel Roger that.

The CUE I submitted two years ago contested an inaccurate percentage on an initial decision from 20 years earlier. However, they stuck it under AMA because that was when I got my CUE, despite the fact that the error was made during the legacy appeal timeframe.

 

My first BVA case was legacy.  The CAVC, in response to a mandamus appeal referred me to a Legacy Appeal for this case.  So the BVA Judge did not read the record of what brought about the appeal in the first place.  Again, it is a wait and see game.  I do not think the CAVC is going to take lightly to the BVA Judge's change to AMA given it was their referral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
33 minutes ago, john999 said:

VA fraud against vets is SOP for the VA.  If you are claiming big retro expect them to use every dirty trick in the book.

I have always felt that about BVA appeals for EED. In my opinion, I feel the person that intakes the appeal and dockets it, move it to the back of the line.

Even though BVA by regulation is supposed to adjudicate appeals in dock order, like you said, if it’s a large retro, they will pull out every trick in the book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
12 minutes ago, Lemuel said:

My first BVA case was legacy.  The CAVC, in response to a mandamus appeal referred me to a Legacy Appeal for this case.  So the BVA Judge did not read the record of what brought about the appeal in the first place.  Again, it is a wait and see game.  I do not think the CAVC is going to take lightly to the BVA Judge's change to AMA given it was their referral.

BVA is notorious for acting confused when dealing with cavc orders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
8 minutes ago, Stayfocus said:

BVA is notorious for acting confused when dealing with cavc orders.

There are times when the CAVC will say BS readjudicate the veteran's appeal. 

See: Stegall v West 11 vet app 268 (1998)

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use