Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

CRSC Question

Rate this question


Vync

Question

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Have any of you tried to apply for CRSC since the VA conceded AO? 

This is a follow up question regarding the topic linked below "CRSC Question" and the changes the VA and the Army made regarding presumptives related to Agent Organge.

Here's the prior question:

 

The veteran I am helping is retired Army  20 years, honorable discharge, existing 10% SC rating, plus served boots on the ground in Vietnam. He applied for SC for hypothyroidism and is currently SC for it, too.

Since the earlier question, the VA site https://www.va.gov/resources/combat-related-special-compensation-crsc/ has been updated to include 

Quote

What the evidence must show about your combat-related disability

The evidence must show that your injury happened while you were:

  • Engaged in armed conflict (in combat or during an occupation or raid), or 
  • Engaged in hazardous duty (like demolition, flying, or parachuting), or
  • Participating in war simulation activities (like live fire weapons practice or hand-to-hand combat training), or
  • Exposed to instruments of war (like a military vehicle, weapon, or chemical agent), or
  • Engaged in an activity you received a Purple Heart for

They added "instruments of war" to include "...or chemical agent".

 

Also, over on the Army site https://www.hrc.army.mil/content/Combat Related Special Compensation CRSC Eligibility

Quote

In order to be eligible for Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC), you MUST meet all of the following criteria;

1. Receiving military retired pay examples include: 20 year Retiree, Medical Chapter 61, Temporary Early Retirement Act, and Temporary Disabled Retirement List Retiree

2. Have 10% or greater VA rated injury that is combat-related

3. Military retired pay is reduced by VA disability payments (VA Waiver)

AND… must be able to provide documentary evidence that your injury was a result of one of the following:

  • Training that simulates war (e.g., exercises, field training)
  • Hazardous duty (e.g., flight, diving, parachute duty)
  • An instrumentality of war (e.g., combat vehicles, weapons, Agent Orange)
  • Armed conflict (e.g., gun shot wounds [Purple Heart], punji stick injuries)

They added "instrumentality of war" to include "...Agent Orange".

 

Given the fact that he previously met all the criteria except a clearly defined "instruments of war" aspect, since the VA and the Army have updated that to include "chemical agent/Agent Orange", would that be sufficient?

I ask because I called the Army Human Resources command to ask about it regarding his qualifications. They told me he would qualify for it. I don't want to get too excited for him until I learn more about it and see if anyone else has filed for CRSC since they added chemical agent or Agent Orange.

Thoughts?


 

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Applied for CRSC several years ago this is what resulted:

1. Your application for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) was reconsidered using the additional, clarifying, or new information provided. Your application remains approved, and is amended, as indicated below:

 

COMBAT RELATED:

 

Diagnosis

VASRD

VA%

Determination

B/L Factor

Claim Date

CRSC Eff Date

Ischemic heart diease

7006

 

100

Combat-related; Instrumentality of War - Agent Orange

No

07/21

03/12*

Obstructive sleep apnea

6847

 

50

Combat-related; Instrumentality of War - Agent Orange

No

04/18

09/13

Residual scar

7800

 

30

Combat-related; Instrumentality of War - Agent Orange

No

04/18

03/13

Glenohumeral joint instability R arm

5201

 

30

Combat-related; Instrumentality of War - Agent Orange

No

04/18

03/14

Damage of cranial nerve V / horner's syndrome

8205

 

10

Combat-related; Instrumentality of War - Agent Orange

No

04/18

11/14

Damage of cranial nerve VII

8207

 

10

Combat-related; Instrumentality of War - Agent Orange

No

04/18

11/14

Damage of cranial nerve XI

8211

 

10

Combat-related; Instrumentality of War - Agent Orange

No

04/18

11/14

Anisocoria

6099
6000

 

0

Combat-related; Instrumentality of War - Agent Orange

No

04/18

01/15

* Note: The VA backdated his effective date to 3/1/2012 due to BVA

appeal outcome.

You are receiving Concurrent Retirement and Disability Pay (CRDP) at the 100% rate ($2108.00--capped at gross retirement pay). If CRDP exceeds the amount of your CRSC entitlement, you will continue to receive CRDP in lieu of CRSC. Concurrent payments of both CRDP and CRSC are prohibited by Public Laws 107-314 and 108-136. If CRSC is more beneficial than CRDP, DFAS will effect CRSC payment to you within 120 days of receipt of this letter. CRSC payments will be made in the same manner as your retired pay (i.e. EFT or check). For more information on CRDP, please visit the DFAS website link below:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

@toddt Thank you for the information. Couple of quick questions for you:

1. Around when did you retire?

2. Around when did you submit a claim for VA benefits?

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

@Vnyc - Retired Aug 1980 entered service Feb 1959.  Claims were started December 2011 (hearing loss and tinnitus).  Found Hadit and started reading alot.  A Grahm  answered a couple of my questions and I was off and running.  The Ischemic Heart disease claim was filed March 2013 and back dated one year.

Edited by toddt
Got a "No result" for a name I mentioned so i miss spelled it
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

@toddt Thank you very much for the good info! 

The veteran I am trying to help is retired Army, served in Vietnam, has his retirement pay reduced by the VA disability compensation amount, plus is SC at 10% (10% for a knee injury, 0% heart rhythm, and 0% for hypothyroidism but if filing a supplemental to get that increased). His initial 10% was from 1990 when he filed right after retirement, but I have no idea if the CRSC would go back that far. What is your take on it?

 

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Statute of limitations: You must file your claim within six years of the date of a VA rating decision that could make you eligible for CRSC, or the date you became eligible for retired pay, whichever is more recent. If you file after the six-year limit, you will only be eligible for up to six years of retroactive payments

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder
On 6/29/2024 at 9:03 AM, toddt said:

Statute of limitations: You must file your claim within six years of the date of a VA rating decision that could make you eligible for CRSC, or the date you became eligible for retired pay, whichever is more recent. If you file after the six-year limit, you will only be eligible for up to six years of retroactive payments

He submitted a number of claims under the PACT Act related to Agent Orange. The VA conceded AO, but everything else got denied because they somehow did not receive any non-VA medical records. Should have a supplemental out next week with more records, release of medical to VA auth forms, buddy letters, etc... 

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use