Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Veteran Needs Your Help !

Rate this question


rthomass

Question

I need help from any Veteran that served in Thailand during the Vietnam Era; Specifically Nakon Phanom RTAFB "NKP" Air Force Base, "naked Fanny" during the peiod of August 1969 to August 1970. Need Corroboration of Agent Orange use to support claim remanded by the CAVC to the Board Of Veteran Appeals "BVA".

Randall D. Thomas Sr.

rthomass@insightbb.com

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

This all shows how much leg work you have done-

like that other Thailand AO vet-

You raised an extremely important point-that I do not believe any veteran ever raised before-

when the BVA makes a decision for a vet and another vet -with same time amd place- comes along to prove similiar claim-

the VA should be willing to contact the BVA vet for a buddy statement-especially in a case like yours-

They know the BVA vet's name and address---and there is no way anyone else can get it- only CAVC vets names and addresses are public-

Maybe the BVA could even be subpeonaed to give that info out-

after all in a court of law -everyone has the right to have witnesses-

and this Thailand vet is a witness to what you also experienced.

Do you have all of your SMRs and personnel records?

Could they possible contain names of others who also might provide buddy statements if needed?

I commend you on getting that remand-

it only makes sense that the AO was used not only to destroy cover for the enemy but also to keep even all of the airbase perimeters clear of weeds and brush.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would think you could get, from the AF, the aircraft tail numbers of all aircraft outfitted w/the AO spraying equipment and then the flight logs from those aircraft that flew operation Ranch Hand, which should show where they took off and landed. I'm sure someone out there has that info, just like the huge resources the VN helicopter pilots assn has developed. Had an AF vet, in a group some years back, swear AO was used, in base perimeters, in England. He stated "he often wondered why no foliage grew in the perimeter wire areas." jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ask this group of thia AF vets Some have served there and will help if they can! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/USARSUPTHAI/

I would think you could get, from the AF, the aircraft tail numbers of all aircraft outfitted w/the AO spraying equipment and then the flight logs from those aircraft that flew operation Ranch Hand, which should show where they took off and landed. I'm sure someone out there has that info, just like the huge resources the VN helicopter pilots assn has developed. Had an AF vet, in a group some years back, swear AO was used, in base perimeters, in England. He stated "he often wondered why no foliage grew in the perimeter wire areas." jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another more important group that you need to be aware of is TVVET, Thialand viet nam vets for equal treatment ,. The contact info i have is a wonderful lady by the name of Maryland Oliver . She has put togeather a cd that has many cases and evidence that will be invaluable to you with this. The cd is free just e-mail her at themamabear47@yahoo.com She is a true advocate and will responded quickly to your request. Hope this helps. Ron

Ask this group of thia AF vets Some have served there and will help if they can! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/USARSUPTHAI/
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much of the Thailand records have been 'modified' to show, or not show, whatever the government wants to show.

I have two different accounts of the same time frame.

One backs me up, that's the one that I found myself.

The other does not support my story at all, from the same historian at the same place and time.

It was found by the VA.

We worked on a few Nam planes, C-130's, at Ubon toward the middle part of 73.

They were all covered with oily stuff and smelled pretty bad.

When they had to set down at the nearest base for a quick fix, Ubon was the closest to the HO Trail at that latitude.

Ubon had the AC-130 Gunships, Spectre.

My records were classified until 1998.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This all shows how much leg work you have done-

like that other Thailand AO vet-

You raised an extremely important point-that I do not believe any veteran ever raised before-

when the BVA makes a decision for a vet and another vet -with same time amd place- comes along to prove similiar claim-

the VA should be willing to contact the BVA vet for a buddy statement-especially in a case like yours-

They know the BVA vet's name and address---and there is no way anyone else can get it- only CAVC vets names and addresses are public-

Maybe the BVA could even be subpeonaed to give that info out-

after all in a court of law -everyone has the right to have witnesses-

and this Thailand vet is a witness to what you also experienced.

Do you have all of your SMRs and personnel records?

Could they possible contain names of others who also might provide buddy statements if needed?

I commend you on getting that remand-

it only makes sense that the AO was used not only to destroy cover for the enemy but also to keep even all of the airbase perimeters clear of weeds and brush.

Berta I firmly believe that the Veterans Board of Appals as well as the RO are bound by M21-1 to assist me on developing my claim. Contacting this individual by the Veterans Administration wopuld fall into that area. Sure would lik for VIKING17 TO GIVE HIS 2 CENTS worth on this..........Service Mediacal Records for NKP 69-70 would only show a operation for a double hernia; supposedly acute food poisoning ....so the doc said....AO ? Wonder...... The real answer is for me to come up with buddy letters..got one coming from a membet of this site vietnam_war_vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
    • karlduerr earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use