Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Emotionally Extremely Disturbed - Please Tell Me I Did Not Have Only 90 Days To File A Notice Of Intention To File Claim !

Rate this question


marielovesashley

Question

In New York State, if the medical malpractice / negligence occurred at a municipal hospital, such as one of the members of the New York City Health and Hospital Corporation or a County Hospital such as Nassau County Medical Center there are very strict periods much shorter in length. A Notice of Claim has to be filed with the municipality within 90 days of an event and a lawsuit must be started within one year and 90 days. At a hospital operated by the State of New York, such as Down state Medical Center in Brooklyn, Stonybrook University Hospital in Suffolk County or Upstate Medical Center in Syracuse a Notice of Intention to File Claim must be made within 90 days of the event and with the State of New York in the Court of Claims within two years.

Source:

http://www.ask4sam.net/glossary.html

Questions:

1) In the County - Even if they I fought like hell to get all the documentation and they finally send me all the documentation March 20th, 2007 (U.S. post stamp) ? (I have proofs that they took their time - emails sent)

2) A hospital operated by the State of New York - is a VA hospital considered to operated by the State? I notified the Congressman McHugh as soon as December 19th, 2006 and he forwarded the informations to the Department of Veterans Affairs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Marie,i read your profile and you don't list your self as a veteran.If you are a veteran,there is no time limits to file a claim with the va.

mobie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marie is widow of a veteran.

A widow has one year from date of death to acquire the best EED-date of death.

Otherwise the EED is date of claim.

A widow -if the vet had claim in progress and the widow re-opens-and succeeds on the deceased veterans claim-can be awarded all benefits due and payable to the veteran prior to the veteran's death-IF the widow or widower files the 21-534 application within one year after death.

The new law is ALL- meaning if the vets claim was in the system for years and then the widow succeeded on the vets claim-it could be a very substantial accrued award.

Veterans and widows or widowers of veterans only have 2 years from time of knowledge of death or injury due to VA medical care to file Federal Tort Claim.I had local vet.He claimed malpractice causing him to lose part of his leg.AN incident involving maggots in his leg at a VAMC while hospitalised was the date he used for his knowledge of malpractice.In any event I knew him and gave him the SF 95 within a week after this occurred.Also he sent me his med records and I did see entries that possibly supported his charges.

Long story- however- I asked him numerous times,after he left the local VAMC, if he had sent the SF 95 to Regional COunsel and obtained legal services.He had multiple excuses that he didnt do those things.He called me continually during these 2 years of the SOL and mailed me copies of letters he had sent to COngressmen and Senators, but he didnt mail the SF 95.

He had been transferred out to other facilities so I couldnt go and get the form and mail it for him-

He filed the form 2 days after the 2 year SOL ran out.

He lost any potential he had for FTCA award due to malpractice.

If the malpractice occurred in private hospital and not VA-those statutes are different.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

Yeah, I did not have the time to really create a profile yet, sorry. :D

Berta, I know there is no contradiction here: :unsure:

A widow has one year from date of death to acquire the best EED-date of death.

Otherwise the EED is date of claim.

-vs-

Veterans and widows or widowers of veterans only have 2 years from time of knowledge of death or injury due to VA medical care to file Federal Tort Claim.

I wish to check if I am getting what I need to get from this above. What it means is for the best benefits if you claim inside a year, otherwise you'd get what you'd get if you do that inside 2 years. Please confirm or infirm.

Is it the 21-534 application? I guess it is because it is following right after. If that's the case, "P.J.", a DAV officer told me to fill this out a.s.a.p. so I did 3 weeks after my hubby's death.

Thank you for being effective. I have other things to sort out and I'll be back soon.

See ya later !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Is it the 21-534 application? I guess it is because it is following right after. If that's the case, "P.J.", a DAV officer told me to fill this out a.s.a.p. so I did 3 weeks after my hubby's death."

The DAV rep was right-

the VA wanted widows to apply within that first year because that would kick in the accrued benefit determination.

What I mean by that is- if a veteran had a pending disability claim for VA compensation-and the widow applied for this as an accrued benefit in the 21-534 within the first year after death- the VA would award the accrued benefit due the veteran if the widow re-opens the claim and supports it with more evidence- if needed.

The VA does not really want widows to lose the accrued benefit. If the vet deserved the accrued compensation,due to medical evidence-they want to award it to the widow or widower.The VA doesnt want to keep it.

There is a section you already filled out if you have filed the 21-534 already-

if the vet had a pending claims for direct SC comp- the VA will adjudicate that-and award the money to you- if the benefit is granted.

Also the VA will award DIC to date of death but only if the 21-534 is filed within that year after death.

I have no idea how your DAV rep handled the Sec 1151 issue.

It could be put as part of a 21-534 application or filed separately.

It appears you are filing for DIC because the VA caused your husbands death under Section 1151.

I filed both direct SC death and also Sec 1151 death.The DAV rep will be more familiar with your situation and can advise you better on that.

If you intend to file a federal tort claim-the DAV will not be able to advise on that-

The 2 year statute of limits is only on the FTCA issue.

Did you read the older reply from a malpractice lawyer at ALLVETS?

FTCA issues with VA are legal federal issues with the USA -

DIC under Sec 1151 or direct SC death is a sole VA issue that is separate from the FTCA claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The DAV officer is my friend. I was asking the folks all over the internet (100 groups) to call the Congressman when my husband's liver and kidneys were shutting down. It's how I met P.J.

American Legion is my rep.

Thank you for your good work. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use