Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Second C&p Exam Ordered After Submitting Imo

Rate this question


tssnave

Question

After reading hadit for a couple of months I am beginning to see some trends that the VA seems to use to get our claims off track. For those of you who are long time readers, this may be old hat. But, for my benefit and the benefit of other newbies (and those who read for weeks like I did before joining), I ask you:

1. Have you ever had the VA order a second (or subsequent) C&P exam after you sent in an Indepedent Medical Opinion (IMO) that supported your position?

2. Did the VA use the additional C&P exam to refute your IMO? Or, more to the point as I understand the VA rating system, did they "weigh" their own evidence more than they did your IMO?

3. Did they rate in your favor or against you?

4. Did you, in response to their additional C&P get another IMO? Something just struck me, of course you didn't because at that point an additional IMO would not be considered new and material, it would be cummulative of the evidence already submitted and not be accepted as evidence. Please tell me I'm wrong here - it seems to me that the VA can order as many additional C&P exams as they want with a panel of multiple doctors no less (2 folks have shared they have had panel interviews with 2-3 shrinks) to shore up the weight of their position while not giving you that same opportunity. Am I correct?

5. Were you upheld at BVA or is your claim still pending.

Thanks in advance for the feedback. I'm curious to see just how frequently they order additional C&P exams after you send in an IMO that supports your claim.

ts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Josephine,

Your "story" is EXACTLY what we here need to know. It shows a clear pattern of VA mismanagement, and is an example of what others can expect. Personally I have a small problem with b*tching for b*tchings sake. We all need to vent sometimes, but I'd much rather read something like your story, and how it has developed because I can actually use it to form ideas, and strategies in handleing other cases. I know that probably immaterial to why you posted it, but I wanted to clarify my position on the VA and how it handles or mishandles (in your case) the claims process.

Thank you for sharing you story with us... and I am sorry that this has taken so long... There is obviously a BIG problem here, and one that needs addressed.

Bob Smith

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Bob,

One of the hadit members wrote to me and ask me to post my story, so that the new members could learn from my experience. I am like you, I don't go for the Bxxxx either.

Thanks,

Josephine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use