I am a GW vet 1991
I originally filed a claim in 1997 for:
*Rashes
*Join Pain
*Acute gastroenteritis
*Antisocial Personality Disorder
*Right Knee
*Weight Loss
All denied.
( the records show in their decision that they requested 1 time my private records from 2 hospitals in June of 1998 and as of the date of the denial Aug 1998 no records were recieved... there were several other issues with the duty to assist at that time in 1997, but from things I have recently read, you can NOT win a case for their lacking in their duty to assist as a CUE, even if they had assisted and the outcome would have been manifestly different in my favor, If you know the actual answer to this, please let me know.) I understand that in 2000 there were new regulations with regard to the duty to assist.
All of my contentions were denied as NWG (Not Well Grounded) Stating that there were no in service records proving that I had these issues. And although they have records from an additional Hospital ( I have no idea whats in those records, they stated that I did not have proof of a CURRENT condition at that time. ( had they gotten the records in their duty to assist they would have had that proof, and is part of my contention)
Fast forward 2014
I filed a claim for:
*IBS
*Fibro
Both denied stating no in service connection basically and also denied the earlier effective date request ( no reason to approve the EED because denied)
Then 30 days later I sent them a CUE regarding the IBS & Fibro and all the GW Presumptive info I could find, also requesting an EED.
*IBS Approved at 30%
*Fibro Approved at 40%
Earlier Effective Date Denied because I filed in 1997, was denied in 1998 and never filed an NOD or Appeal within 1 year.
Then I filed a claim for:
*Bipolar/et all Awarded 100%
*Sleep Apnea 2ndary to Fibro Awarded 50%
Requested in that the EED for Bipolar/et all Fibro and IBS, was Denied on all 3 as to EED.
Now, I am a the stage of having to file something to try to be successful in being awarded the reto to 97'.
1st claim for IBS in 2014 stated that it was REOPENED (not a new claim) is that a possible thing to point at?
1st claim for Bipolar/et all in 2014 stated REOPENED (not a new claim) is that a possible thing to point at?
Are there any hail marry's out there? they didnt even respond to or address the things I sent them regarding TL 10-01, presumtive info etc.
And all of the diagnostic codes they have given me are NOT the GW presumptive 88's.
All award letters specifically state a direct service connection. If 2014 states direct service connection from records that existed while in service how can 1998 state no direct service connection? (different eyes?, something they found that was OVERLOOKED in 97' new and material?)
Not sure what else you mght need from me, but I am happy to reply, thank you all in advance for checking this out to see if you can help.
Question
DivingBoard
I am a GW vet 1991
I originally filed a claim in 1997 for:
*Rashes
*Join Pain
*Acute gastroenteritis
*Antisocial Personality Disorder
*Right Knee
*Weight Loss
All denied.
( the records show in their decision that they requested 1 time my private records from 2 hospitals in June of 1998 and as of the date of the denial Aug 1998 no records were recieved... there were several other issues with the duty to assist at that time in 1997, but from things I have recently read, you can NOT win a case for their lacking in their duty to assist as a CUE, even if they had assisted and the outcome would have been manifestly different in my favor, If you know the actual answer to this, please let me know.) I understand that in 2000 there were new regulations with regard to the duty to assist.
All of my contentions were denied as NWG (Not Well Grounded) Stating that there were no in service records proving that I had these issues. And although they have records from an additional Hospital ( I have no idea whats in those records, they stated that I did not have proof of a CURRENT condition at that time. ( had they gotten the records in their duty to assist they would have had that proof, and is part of my contention)
Fast forward 2014
I filed a claim for:
*IBS
*Fibro
Both denied stating no in service connection basically and also denied the earlier effective date request ( no reason to approve the EED because denied)
Then 30 days later I sent them a CUE regarding the IBS & Fibro and all the GW Presumptive info I could find, also requesting an EED.
*IBS Approved at 30%
*Fibro Approved at 40%
Earlier Effective Date Denied because I filed in 1997, was denied in 1998 and never filed an NOD or Appeal within 1 year.
Then I filed a claim for:
*Bipolar/et all Awarded 100%
*Sleep Apnea 2ndary to Fibro Awarded 50%
Requested in that the EED for Bipolar/et all Fibro and IBS, was Denied on all 3 as to EED.
Now, I am a the stage of having to file something to try to be successful in being awarded the reto to 97'.
1st claim for IBS in 2014 stated that it was REOPENED (not a new claim) is that a possible thing to point at?
1st claim for Bipolar/et all in 2014 stated REOPENED (not a new claim) is that a possible thing to point at?
Are there any hail marry's out there? they didnt even respond to or address the things I sent them regarding TL 10-01, presumtive info etc.
And all of the diagnostic codes they have given me are NOT the GW presumptive 88's.
All award letters specifically state a direct service connection. If 2014 states direct service connection from records that existed while in service how can 1998 state no direct service connection? (different eyes?, something they found that was OVERLOOKED in 97' new and material?)
Not sure what else you mght need from me, but I am happy to reply, thank you all in advance for checking this out to see if you can help.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
2
2
1
Popular Days
Aug 16
6
Aug 30
5
Aug 31
1
Top Posters For This Question
DivingBoard 4 posts
Berta 2 posts
broncovet 2 posts
FormerMember 1 post
Popular Days
Aug 16 2016
6 posts
Aug 30 2016
5 posts
Aug 31 2016
1 post
Popular Posts
john999
Send NOD by express mail with return receipt. If you do not file NOD you will lose your EED and have to start from scratch. If you let NOD deadline pass you are lost. You must be willing to play by
broncovet
Do NOT wait until the nod time runs out to file a 3.156 new and material evidence. File the new evidence now, as soon as you have the new evidence. It will work well with the NOD>
Berta
Duty to assist does not regard CUE claims, which are not really 'claims' at all but a frontal attack on a past unappealed decision. There are some successful cuers here. My success grew out
11 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now