retiredat44

It is important to note that even though some of the info posted on Wikipedia is correct and informative, unless it refers to a resource that is reputable, like a medical study, journal article published by a board certified doc, etc., the VA will not consider it to be probative. It is usually some one's opinion that isn't substantiated. A C&P examiner will ignore or completely discount it.

yes... but there is a long offical history of chemcials (from the developeres an researchers) and I am not using it in any claim...  my claims were closed a couple years ago...

I am only making a point about the outright lies the va uses and gaslights claimants...

plus they don't read any documents.... no matter where they come from...

if I were I would note the sources, go to the scientists and researchers documents, but none of that matters, only the IMO's. Which the fights back against.

I am referring to the legal reps who are stating that the va still fights back against the vets who got sick on the flight line from chemicals, noting the radio/podcast I am referring to about the chemicals. And those that are getting screwed who got sick from them.