Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Varo Sent Cue Claim To Dav For Review?

Rate this question


Guest Jim S.

Question

I checked on my CUE claim's progress today and was told it was sent to my DAV representative for review, since he has my power of attorney to represent me.

I filed the claim on my own, without any assistance from the DAV, because they refused to consider my claim for CUE in the first place.

Now I am being told it was sent to them for review and they are waiting for the DAV to return it. Also I was told that the DAV post is vacant at the moment and they are looking for someone to permanently fill the possition. I guess it is being filled by temperary personel at the moment.

What would be my best course of acction at this point? Maybe I should be asked to be appointed to the postion. Not sure how SS would see this, they may claim I am able to work and cut off my SSDI benefits.

Anyway, I would like the members opions on the next course of action.

Jim S. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Pete-that is the same vet who blasted me when I started here-

I got the same type of emails too -awful stuff about Dr. Bash-

'your boy Craig did this and that ---your boy screwed me'---why did you recommend him blah blah bah-

He blamed me for what he said was a lousy opinion from Bash and mailed it to me-I read it and it was not lousy at all

Dr. Bash got him all he could-and what he promised him he could try for- which was better than the 10% he had-but he will never get 100% SC.No evidence at all of that.

Dr. Bash got this vet A & A on his wife's 100% VA SC. Dr. Bash cannot perform any miracle-

If you ever access this specific vet's BVA case- you will see what is really what there-

Maybe this is not appropriate -what I just said here- but this vet did all he could to get me off hadit---

called me all hours of night and day-emailed me awful stuff, talked behind back of many here-

and he lied to all of us many times-

I had a big flashback when you mentioned this- sorry all----I am pissed off just thinking about him----

Jim- do you get any private counseling at all- are you on Medicare and got medicare set you up with someone who could give you an opinion.

Jim is correct-Dr. Bash refers many psychiatric claims-because as a NeuroRadiologist, the VA could say his opinion is without rationale and merit for mental disabilties.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim- I think it is odd that they sent it to the DAV-

Maybe they called the DAV and the guy didnt know what they were talking about and wanted to see your CUE.

My CUE -it was at the rating board for 2 months but it went to a supervisor coach last week.

My vet rep at the VARO got the point of it when I first filed it- but if they sent it to my local vet rep-

I dont think he would know what to say to them-on a CUE-

The VA had sent me a letter regarding it-(in March) they didnt say what they needed -VCAA letters do not come to CUE claimants- it seemed like they were just restating it-

and had some questions-sort of- weird letter---have you heard anything on it from the VARO?

I replied with the VA case law and General Counsel Opinion (and BVA links)that supports the CUE and I sent a copy of the decision I Cued- which they have all this- but I then found something great in 38 CFR-and sent that too-

I had never noticed this before- if a veteran, by medical evidence is eligible for SMC yet the VA fails to consider the vet- that is a CUE-(unless still an open claim)

It says it right in M21-1 or 38-forget where-

I had never seen it stated that succinctly before-

So I repeated it in my response,attached copy of this reg, and also the decision I sent shows the veteran was eligible but not considered at all-

Oddly enough Bell works for me in this claim. The SMC CUE was in 1998.

My main claim was decided months ago- 3 authorizors signed off and the vet rep said that is done-but they are putting both decisions together- I think-

it involves Nehmer so that would make sense.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use