Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C+p Boy Am I Amd

Rate this question


Jim MAC

Question

:rolleyes: Well I had my C+P exam yesterday. A little background first a lot of you know I have been fighting with my R.O for over 3 years there are still three issues on the table.

Service connection for Asbestos. VA has admitted that my job is probably for asbestoses exposure.. Right shoulder pain in SMR’r .Back pain one notation in service record.

Ok that’s the background went to a DRO hearing in June. Got a call about 2 weeks ago that I would have a C+P exam on August 23 at 1 PM. Was told that I would receive a letter in the mail with a questionnaire in it. Was told that it was for asbestoses. Well did not receive any letter in the mail. Went to my C+P exam they gave me the questioners to fill out it was for all 3 items. Ok so far so good.

Here were it gets bad. Seeing the doctor he had none of my records at all. I asked him if he had the Xrays from the VA medical center for my claim he said no. I asked him if he had the MRI from the VA center he said no. They took x-rays but why was the MRI not available to the doctor? I was then given a PFI test? The one were you blew in the tube and they check your lung capacity? Nurse told me it was a 71 anybody know what that means? Then they gave me an inhaler 2 take two shots of medicine waited a half an hour and had me take the test again. Then it was normal. Anybody know why they did that?

Thanks,

Jim

Delay, Delay, Delay another thousand Vets will die today. This has been almost a 9 year trip thru the VA maze.

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Jim,

Sorry to hear it did not go well, it was a QTC contract right? The office in VA Beach? I have had two done there, the last one QTC did was a local Doc they have a contract with now in Williamsburg. Here is some info from 38 on those numbers. It is under Schedule of ratings--respiratory system

Boats

Interstitial Lung Disease

6825 Diffuse interstitial fibrosis (interstitial pneumonitis, fibrosing alveolitis).

6826 Desquamative interstitial pneumonitis.

6827 Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis.

6828 Eosinophilic granuloma of lung.

6829 Drug-induced pulmonary pneumonitis and fibrosis.

6830 Radiation-induced pulmonary pneumonitis and fibrosis.

6831 Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (extrinsic allergic alveolitis).

6832 Pneumoconiosis (silicosis, anthracosis, etc.).

6833 Asbestosis.

General Rating Formula for Interstitial Lung Disease (diagnostic codes 6825 through 6833):

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) less than 50-percent predicted, or; Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide by the Single Breath Method (DLCO (SB)) less than 40-percent predicted, or; maximum exercise capacity less than 15 ml/kg/min oxygen consumption with cardiorespiratory limitation, or; cor pulmonale or pulmonary hypertension, or; requires outpatient oxygen therapy 100

FVC of 50- to 64-percent predicted, or; DLCO (SB) of 40- to 55-percent predicted, or; maximum exercise capacity of 15 to 20 ml/kg/min oxygen consumption with cardiorespiratory limitation 60

FVC of 65- to 74-percent predicted, or; DLCO (SB) of 56- to 65-percent predicted 30

FVC of 75- to 80-percent predicted, or; DLCO (SB) of 66- to 80-percent predicted 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim,

Sorry to hear it did not go well, it was a QTC contract right? The office in VA Beach? I have had two done there, the last one QTC did was a local Doc they have a contract with now in Williamsburg. Here is some info from 38 on those numbers. It is under Schedule of ratings--respiratory system

Boats

Interstitial Lung Disease

6825 Diffuse interstitial fibrosis (interstitial pneumonitis, fibrosing alveolitis).

6826 Desquamative interstitial pneumonitis.

6827 Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis.

6828 Eosinophilic granuloma of lung.

6829 Drug-induced pulmonary pneumonitis and fibrosis.

6830 Radiation-induced pulmonary pneumonitis and fibrosis.

6831 Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (extrinsic allergic alveolitis).

6832 Pneumoconiosis (silicosis, anthracosis, etc.).

6833 Asbestosis.

General Rating Formula for Interstitial Lung Disease (diagnostic codes 6825 through 6833):

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) less than 50-percent predicted, or; Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide by the Single Breath Method (DLCO (SB)) less than 40-percent predicted, or; maximum exercise capacity less than 15 ml/kg/min oxygen consumption with cardiorespiratory limitation, or; cor pulmonale or pulmonary hypertension, or; requires outpatient oxygen therapy 100

FVC of 50- to 64-percent predicted, or; DLCO (SB) of 40- to 55-percent predicted, or; maximum exercise capacity of 15 to 20 ml/kg/min oxygen consumption with cardiorespiratory limitation 60

FVC of 65- to 74-percent predicted, or; DLCO (SB) of 56- to 65-percent predicted 30

FVC of 75- to 80-percent predicted, or; DLCO (SB) of 66- to 80-percent predicted 10

Hey Boats

Do you know what number they use? The first test number or the secound test after they gave me medication. Also it was the one in VA beach. They had the nerve to give me a check for 5 bucks and some change. You know I hit the HRBT at rush hour on the way home

Jim

Delay, Delay, Delay another thousand Vets will die today. This has been almost a 9 year trip thru the VA maze.

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hate to tell you but,if your condition improved to normal with medication, you won't get any thing.

I think they also use the diffrence between the two to decide your.

Someone correct me if i'm wrong!

Hey Boats

Do you know what number they use? The first test number or the secound test after they gave me medication. Also it was the one in VA beach. They had the nerve to give me a check for 5 bucks and some change. You know I hit the HRBT at rush hour on the way home

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

Jim, Request a Copy of the C@P through the FOIA - - ASAP.

Go from there. You can appeal the C@P.

~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a rough experience. 71 could have been your "raw" figure - or percentage. They have ways of calculating your FVC value as the percentage of your expected value (where they factor in age, height, gender). SO in that case - they would divide 71 into the expected value and come up with your figure.

One of the reasons they give you the post test is to test the severity of the disease (as in is it treatable or reversible). If your score improve they SHOULD prescribe you the inhaler - as it works for you.

My husband's tests didn't usually improve with the inhaler. But when he was in the hospital during his last illness they actually did find something that worked some.

So the "bad" news would be - as long as they can find something that works in improving your FVC - your disease won't be considered as disabling.

The good news is that being unable to breathe is a horrid experience - so having something that works in treating that is a good thing.

Free

:) Well I had my C+P exam yesterday. A little background first a lot of you know I have been fighting with my R.O for over 3 years there are still three issues on the table.

Service connection for Asbestos. VA has admitted that my job is probably for asbestoses exposure.. Right shoulder pain in SMR’r .Back pain one notation in service record.

Ok that’s the background went to a DRO hearing in June. Got a call about 2 weeks ago that I would have a C+P exam on August 23 at 1 PM. Was told that I would receive a letter in the mail with a questionnaire in it. Was told that it was for asbestoses. Well did not receive any letter in the mail. Went to my C+P exam they gave me the questioners to fill out it was for all 3 items. Ok so far so good.

Here were it gets bad. Seeing the doctor he had none of my records at all. I asked him if he had the Xrays from the VA medical center for my claim he said no. I asked him if he had the MRI from the VA center he said no. They took x-rays but why was the MRI not available to the doctor? I was then given a PFI test? The one were you blew in the tube and they check your lung capacity? Nurse told me it was a 71 anybody know what that means? Then they gave me an inhaler 2 take two shots of medicine waited a half an hour and had me take the test again. Then it was normal. Anybody know why they did that?

Thanks,

Jim

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a rough experience. 71 could have been your "raw" figure - or percentage. They have ways of calculating your FVC value as the percentage of your expected value (where they factor in age, height, gender). SO in that case - they would divide 71 into the expected value and come up with your figure.

One of the reasons they give you the post test is to test the severity of the disease (as in is it treatable or reversible). If your score improve they SHOULD prescribe you the inhaler - as it works for you.

My husband's tests didn't usually improve with the inhaler. But when he was in the hospital during his last illness they actually did find something that worked some.

So the "bad" news would be - as long as they can find something that works in improving your FVC - your disease won't be considered as disabling.

The good news is that being unable to breathe is a horrid experience - so having something that works in treating that is a good thing.

Free

Tell you the truth they can Service connect me for 0 percent and I will be happy just as long as they sevice connect it.

Jim

Delay, Delay, Delay another thousand Vets will die today. This has been almost a 9 year trip thru the VA maze.

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use