Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Radiation Vets

Rate this question


Berta

Question

I was just discussng this with a potential Atomic veteran and thought I should again post this here-as it was psoted here long ago.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp07/files1/0704654.txt

"A "radiation-exposed" veteran is one who

participated in a radiation-risk activity. A "radiation-risk

activity" includes the onsite participation in a test

involving the atmospheric detonation of a nuclear device,

occupation of Hiroshima or Nagasaki during World War II, or

presence at certain specified sites. 38 C.F.R. § 3.309

(d)(3). In applying this statutory presumption, there is no

requirement for documenting the level of radiation exposure."

(also this decision does not mention the fact the Section 1112 was amended in 2002 to include

All veterans who had service at Amchitka Alaska within the nuclear testing exercises there prior to Jan 1974.

All veterans who had military service at gas diffusion plants in Paducah Kentucky, Portmouth Ohio, or at Area K 25 in Oak Ridge Tennesee with disabilities within Sec 1112 ©

and of course POWS held in Japanese prison camps after the A bomb dropped.

The vet in this recent BVA decision was exposed thus:

"A November 2005 radiation dose estimate from the Air Force

Safety Center indicated that based upon their records for the

veteran, and those for similarly exposed personnel with

common duty specialty codes and periods of exposure, his

likely maximum dose estimate for work conducted between 1964

and 1968 was 3.3 rem whole body deep dose equivalent." However the Undersecretary denied this claim.

The vet then obtained an additional IMO and succeeded in getting his cancer service connected due to radiation exposure.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I lived on an Army Post that required us to wear some gizmo that if it changed color we were supposed to head for sick call. It was a well known secret that we were sleeping on top of nukes that were not supposed to be there. Actually the word confined would be better cause we were not allowed to leave the Post except when we went out to the field for 6 weeks for training.

I don't know why all of a sudden it would dawn on me till I read Berta's last Post that there may be a lot more Atomic Vets than the poor smucks who had to watch the Abombs go off in trenches and ships.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: I have TWO veterans to whom this applies and BLESS you for finding this. They loaded atomic bombs during the cold war and they both have been denied and NOW I can finally go back to the VA and say AHA!! Thank you so much. Of course they are in appeal right now but it should work. Q
bobbyq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

What about he Nuclear sailors who had to work inside of the reactor compartments when a Job had to be done, Would this be a Radiation Risk?

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jbasser -it could certainly be a 'risk' for exposure- but the fact is the vet has to prove the exposure caused them a disability that is proven to be directly due to the exposure unless within those presumptive regs-

My husband worked for over 10 years as a Nuke-equipment operator at a power plant-

they sure were fitted up with extensive gear-constant training and drills, and the RAD dosage was constantly monitored.

He technically was in an environement full of risk- but the Nuclear Power industry took great steps to prevent accidents.

If his PTSD had not gotten to him- he was making big bucks in the Nuke industry and would have made much more-

He never saw his 100% award from VA and the amount was nothing compared to what he could have made- without dealing with PTSD.

There is a lot to this subject-Atomic veterans-

Unfortunately many of these A Bomb vets are dead- who served in Japan during the occupation.My neighbor described how they walked through the devastation- they were not armed-(Army 1945)

and the Japanese survivors treated them with respect as Japan had already conceded they lost the War.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS there are many radiation/atomic vet claims at the BVA- I wish I had time to read them all -this one is good-

http://www.va.gov/vetapp04/files2/0419275.txt

The vet raised two potential causes for his disability- radiation exposure and also Agent Orange-

The VA granted the claim for radiation exposure.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta, you are correct, There is one thing that differentiates between the exposure post bomb and a controlled Nuclear Reactor. ( Contamination)

Radiation is energy admitted from an unstable atom or isotope.

Contamination is particles of that energy in an unwanted area. Contamination can be inhaled into the throat and lungs.

I had to wear TLD.s in servcie. It had 2 crystals. One was short term exposure and the other one was a mass dose crystal so if you ever received an overdose, at least you will know how much killed you.

John

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use