Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Top Va Officials Plotted To Indict Vet In Violation Of Federal Va Rules

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

9/03/2007

National VA Director Pushed US Atty Biskupic to Indict Wisconsin Veteran

[Please credit Michael Leon at MAL Contends. Contact Michael Leon at maleon64@yahoo.com or maleon@charter.com for more information.]

Top VA Officials Plotted to Indict Vet in Violation of Federal VA Rules

http://malcontends.blogspot.com/2007/09/na...ed-us-atty.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I thought I was indicating by analogy ( a very important concept in Veterans Benefits) that there is a very different set of rules as to what constitutes fraud depending on the situation.

Since veterans claims are restricted to a special system with special rules, some of which are supposed to protect veterans (with some of those rules apparently being set aside in this case).

It is/was a politically Neutral statement. I did not advocate his guilt or innocence. I noted that the senate acquited, everthing in the statements are part of the records. My only political statement is can this group fix the system.

How and why the impeachment was prosecuted even has some relevance to the issue. Politics not public interest determining government action.

If I have crossed a line (as fuzzy as it may be) I apologize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The fact is this "is" a political attack on us and the Justice dept.

Roberts, Ramos and Compean are still in prison and will likely remain there until after the elections in 08.

When and if anyone chooses to free those who have sworn to protect us, will not likely happen while we're focused on what a past President has said.

I have to tell you Tyler, if you think your helping your party by making such stupid remarks, your not.

I happen to know there are many dedicated "honest" republicans running for office that wish you to get off the Clinton "lies" BS.

If you choose to do nothing to clean up these lawless acts against US Veterans, some 25,000,000 us us and growing, your going to reap what you sow somewhere down the road.

Let me ask this, can we as a people create and pass laws to protect Veterans in the future from such CRIMINAL acts?

Can we pass laws to hunt those down that have commited ilegal acts against us in the past and imprison "THEM" for their crimes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My last post should have posted under Pete's post.

it was intended to discuss/clarify why I used that reference and has been mis-understood. Because of how it was posted and my poor choice of words, not due to any individual/s capabilities of comprehension.

Any additional comment I might make on this subject will probably be over scrutinized and argued on minutia, so I will drop out of the discussion.

Allan, I do not belong to any political party and I feel that my post is being mischaracterized. I clearly choose a poor example for an analogy.

Best regards,

Tyler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tyler, I think you were taken out of context by over thinkers, I get it. RC

GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.

"Do more than is required of you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Tyler:

I apologize if I misunderstood your post but as an over thinker I was worried about another dustup between the pro war and anti war Members or maybe it would be the Democrat and Republican members.

I was along with the ride when it involved a Veteran who was being persecuted and mistreated by the VA. The train turned down a dirt road when it diverted to a political catfight between people who could at least defend themselves.

I am dropping out also. Be nice to each other.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

Biskupic, only used his own agenda driven investigation. He didn't go to the FBI or Postal Inspector for an out side investigation. This could mean that Mr. Biskupic, could be fired from his job and then given another higher paying job.

Biscuits, has sure messed up this time.

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use