Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Living The Claim

Rate this question


spike

Question

Listen,

I am giving a piece of advice here. I understand many veterans find something that is 'wrong' with them, but if you are 100% P&T I would advise against living the claim. Let it be. Let yourself work on your health. One of my friends have said a good metaphor about this....."It's like poking a bear with a stick"-Hadit member (formerly) Jay Johnson. Your asking for the VA to re-investigate your claims. If you are 100 % PT, don't start making all kinds of different claims right away. Think about it this way and I hate to say it this way. What if the person at the VA Claims office, just got in a fight with his wife, slept in the car, back is hurting, and your the first claim he or she gets. Think that they might not 'dig' into your C-file to see if every I is dotted and T is crossed?. I have heard of some vets, losing their ratings because they started a new claim and something in the time that they had the new C&P exam (something they said or did) in the exam triggered the Rating Officer to change their rating for one of their previous ratings. Maybe because the new doctors opinion was different. Take this with a grain of salt. If you don't believe it happens, I am sorry but it does.

-Spike-

Vet Advocate

--------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Spike, while I respect your experience in helping vets, I have disagree and say that your logic is flawed. If you have a condition, even if it is P&T, you WILL be called in to have a C&P prior to that 20 year mark. In essence, you are saying to not file claims in order to avoid something that is un-avoidable. That just doesn't make any sense. Now, I wouldn't advise a 100% schedular or IU vet to file for just anything. However, if that vet has a condition that he knows could end up being life threatening, such as a heart condition, then he should file. Likewise, if the vet knows that he meets the criteria for something, PTSD for example, where he could be paid at the 50% rate, then he should file, also, in order to receive his SMC that he is entitled to. You should not, however, file for a musculoskelatal condition that you know would be rated at less than 50%. That would not benefit the vet at all. But not filing because you are afraid of another C&P that you're going to have to do at some point anyway...well, that dog just don't hunt. Merry Christmas!

How do you know for sure you will be called in? Do you know because you've heard or you or were you a DVA RO, VSO etc.? That's a pretty bold statement and important info so for the sake of accuracy...

BTW, good with the logic in your post.

I read there is less liklihood of re-exams (already know the 20 year rule) at the five year, and so on mark. Any truth to that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

even flow: I was not P&T. I am in TN and have to go through the Nashville RO. They seem to be fairly even keeled. The reason I made such a bold statement about being called in for a C&P is due to the numerous times I've read it on this board. Let me add this caveat, though; I bet if we were to go back and look in those vets' files, we would find out that they had not made any visits to the VA in a long time. If the VARO starts looking in your file in an attempt to find somewhere to cut costs, and sees that you are continuing your care and that you have established that you aren't getting any better, then it satnds to reason that they would pass you up for an easier target.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rentalguy1

wrote:

"I bet if we were to go back and look in those vets' files, we would find out that they had not made any visits to the VA in a long time. If the VARO starts looking in your file in an attempt to find somewhere to cut costs, and sees that you are continuing your care and that you have established that you aren't getting any better, then it satnds to reason that they would pass you up for an easier target."

********************************************************************************

*

I am not sure if that is true or not about visits to the VA...I have been to a VA facility once and that was for a C/P...when I first was awarded s/c compensation I did call the VAMC to make an appointment for my condition and I was told that due to the increase case loads and lack of doctors that there was a waiting list to even get on a team (wait time appx. 60-90 days). Then once I was placed on a team the waiting time for an appointment was 60-120 days. I decided I would keep going to my family doctor and save the 2hr drive just to hurry up and wait.

I think and I may be wrong on this I am new to this VA stuff...but as long as you are seeking care on a continuous basis and keep all your medical records you should be fine if the VA decides to call you in for a review.

Once I move to another state the closest VA facility is 4.5 hours away so my doctor is going to refer me to a specialist there.

I would hope that would cover the VA critria for continue care.

MT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah..that was me that wrote that. My reasoning for going to the VA is those records are immediately retrievable by the VARO. I have private insurance myself, and had always went to a private physician, until the VARO decided that "since the records were silent" I must be all better...calling me in for a C&P where their examiner lied through his teeth. Now I go exclusively to the VA, even though I have pretty good medical insurance.

Hey Rental Guy

I agree with you I have Tricare since I am retired AF. I use the VA 100 percent of the time because then my whole medical file is there for them to see.

Jim

Delay, Delay, Delay another thousand Vets will die today. This has been almost a 9 year trip thru the VA maze.

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

mountain tyme: yeah...the wait times can suck for sure. And you are right, if you have all your records from private docs you should be fine when you get called in. My point was that if they go on a witch hunt and your name pops up, when they see the records on the computer, then they would probably go elsewhere.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I use the VA for Meds and see Primary and Diabetes Doc, Dental and see a skin Doc now but anything else I use my Medicare HMO. I quit going to Mental Health which may be a mistake but I am prescribed Xanax and Gabapentin for Panic Attacks. I agree with even flow and am not going to worry about it till it happens.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronald beecher went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use