Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Can You Believe "we" Proved My Claim 44 Years Later

Rate this topic


Josephine

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't know where to start, I have the letter. Yes, the

Judge was the Most Honest and Wonderful Judge and gave Credit to

those in the Manner of how a claim should be decided.

I am sure the Attorney for the Board wrote the letter and the Judge

signed it.

Can you believe that "WE" did this 44 years after

discharge? I couldn't have done it without each and everyone of

you!!!!

ORDER

SERVICE CONNECTION FOR CHRONIC ANXIETY IS GRANTED.

This is like a new case at the BVA

THE ISSUE

Whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen the

claim of entitlment to service connection for an acquired psychiatric

disorder, to include anxiety and depression.

It goes on to say that I filed in 1992 and was denied and it became

final as I never appealed.

New and Material

To reopen a claim which has been previously denied and which is

final, the claimant must present new and material evidence.

In this case, the evidence received since the R.O's June 1992 denial

of service connection for chronic anxiety with nervousness includes

some duplicate copies of previously considered treatment records.

Such records were considered in the previous denial and are not new

and material. Also added to the claims file since the previous 1992

denial were additional treatment records not previously of record and

private and VA treatment records which show continued treatment for

psychiatric complaints.

The service treatment records are new in that they reflect inservice

treatment for psychiatric symptoms which were determined to preclude

further military service. These documents include inservice

assessments as to the veterans psychiatric complaints. The evidence

is considered new in that it contains information that was not

considered at the time of the 1992 decision, and it is material

because it purports to show treatment for psychiatric disability

during service which was not objectively shown by the evidence

previously.

Any way this Attorney read my buddy letter, a nurse, who was an eye

witness and I was able to prove assault by a physician and mental

abuse by physicians.

The Swimming pool was a factor also, but not Doris.

Dr. Payne is given weight for his treatment of me for the last 30

years.

Dr. Muller the first C&P doctor carried a lot of weight.

My Pastor of 50 years was given credit

Dr. Campion was given a lot of weight

Dr. Crowley was given a lot of weight

The two lying shrinks very little is said of them.

I have no ideal of how far back I will be paid and how much the

percent will be.

A big thanks to everone!!!

Always,

Betty

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

Congrats!!!!

Have a beautiful weekend and start your new life knowing that you have been vindicated and the lying shrinks reproached.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Congrats!!!!

Have a beautiful weekend and start your new life knowing that you have been vindicated and the lying shrinks reproached.

Thanks so much Pete, This is one statement that I really liked, but

forgot to add:

It is noted that the medical opinions in support of the veteran's

claim, physicians in 2004, Dr. M. P ( Private) 2004 (VA) and in Dr.

B.C. 2008 (Private), were based on review of the entire record and

examination of the veteran.

The Board finds that these three opinions which favor

a grant of service connection are premised upon an accurate picture

of the veteran's history and current condition.

( As you can see, two were not mentioned.)

Always,

Betty

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

AWESOME!!!!!! Congrats!!! I knew you had it licked!

Go out and celebrate! (unless it's more snowy up there than it is here right now)

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Betty,

Like Pete says "vindicated". I am sure as you learned more about how they gave you the PD diagnosis and basically said your condition was developmental and had nothing to do with militray service that the stress and anxiety even worsened. The thing that I have found is that some doctors are BS artists. It takes judge to see through the BS sometimes.

If you have an SO he should be able to find the effective date and percentage on the computer. Then just do the math. My SO told me to sit down before he would tell me how much back pay I was getting. They usually go by the date of the new and material. However, there are some exceptions that might put it earlier. Berta is good with the types of situations that can lead to an earlier effective date.

I was getting chills up and down my spine when I reaad your PM. That is something that occurs when really good things are happening. You hung in there and kept battling.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Way to go!

I dont want to sound like a naysayer, but you still have hurdles. I was granted service connection by the BVA upon appeal, and the RO decided that it was 0%. So, I had to start all over again. I sure hope they dont lowball you like they did me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use