Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Unexpected Phone Call From Regional Office

Rate this question


fullcount15

Question

I received an unexpected phone call this morning from my Regional Office in reference to my claim.

It was in response to a request I made the beginning of November after talking to a VSR via the 1-800-NOCLUE number, that someone call me and give me an accurate status of my claim as I was fed up with the continual roller coaster ride and conflicting information I had been receiving over the past months in reference to the status of my claim. The VSR said she would put my request in the system and someone would contact me within 7-10 days. Needless to say, I didn’t hold my breath for the return phone call.

Anyway, the person that called me this morning informed me that my claim will be finished up this week and I would receive a decision letter within the next two weeks. After he gave me this information, I told him that I received a Fully Favorable on my SSDI claim last week and should I send the decision to the VA. He told me no as my claim would be sent back to the Pre-Determination Team and the entire claim process would start over from Day One. Somehow from his tone of voice and insistence of not sending the SSDI decision in, he was trying to tell me something.

Any suggestions or has anyone experienced this? I just found it very unusual that he called.

Thanx for lending an ear !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Float it and wait until you get the letter from the VA. He is right about the pre determination team. Even if you get a lower percentage, you can submit the SSD award and the information used to obtain that award as evidence you are unemployable.

He may have also told you to wait as he jnows the rating but since it is not officially signed, cant tell you. If you have a VSR then they can find out as it will pass their desk soon.

Be watching the old bank accouunt also. The claim may have beed decided and the retro may suprise you when it hits the bank.

I believe your almost done.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think like you do the guy was trying to do you a favor although the chances are good that the decision will need some more work. However, even if you get 100% after you get your decision I would send a copy of the SSD Decision to the VARO just so that its there.

Good Luck

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

100% right Pete. Send it in Cert. mail A.S.A.P don't trust that info. If the conditions for SSDI and the VA are the same then that info is 100% relevant no matter your % rating from the VA. I see this a lot at the R/O I work at and trust me, if SSA finds you disabled it is considered permanent and implied that you will not get better. You should know by now that an VA 100% rating either TDIU or scheduler is not really considered permanent. The VBA's thinking is that conditions get better or get worst. Did you get the name of the VBA employee? No matter, send an "iris" request and ask for a hold on the decsison until the evidence is in. You should get some reply that the manager cannot do that or something but they will pass on your request to the reating team. Good Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Poolguy:

Thank you for some insight into how it works at the VARO.I would have never guessed that the VA would consider SSD as Permanent.

I have a question for you. I filed my claim in 1991 and was awarded SSD about 4 months after I filed the claim. I informed the VA in my Notice of Disagreement in 1992 when I was turned down that SS had awarded me disability at that time it was reviewable after 5 years. In 1996 when I was awarded 100% P&T the rater made the effective date Oct 1993 or 27 months short of my original and continuous appeal. At the time I did not do anything cause before I had my Hearing I agreed not to appeal if I was awarded 100%.

Just before the year was up in 1997 I wrote a letter disagreeing with the effective date and the VARO wrote me back saying that it was to late to appeal and they used the wrong date that I appealed the final decision.

Do you think that I have a CUE?

Poolguy:

Thank you for some insight into how it works at the VARO.I would have never guessed that the VA would consider SSD as Permanent.

I have a question for you. I filed my claim in 1991 and was awarded SSD about 4 months after I filed the claim. I informed the VA in my Notice of Disagreement in 1992 when I was turned down that SS had awarded me disability at that time it was reviewable after 5 years. In 1996 when I was awarded 100% P&T the rater made the effective date Oct 1993 or 27 months short of my original and continuous appeal. At the time I did not do anything cause before I had my Hearing I agreed not to appeal if I was awarded 100%.

Just before the year was up in 1997 I wrote a letter disagreeing with the effective date and the VARO wrote me back saying that it was to late to appeal and they used the wrong date that I appealed the final decision.

Do you think that I have a CUE?

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Poolguy:

Thank you for some insight into how it works at the VARO.I would have never guessed that the VA would consider SSD as Permanent.

Only if exact conditions for both said claims. For example: a vet has won his claim for SSDI for PTSD however, he was only rated 60% by the VA. Yet he is awaiting appeal with the VBA (round two) it would be pretty hard for a reasonable person to still consider the vet 60% when the SSA standard is 100% or nothing.

However, if the vet won his SSDI claim for PTSD and sleep apnea secondary to obesity and he only a PTSD claim with the VA then it is a different ballgame.

Of chorse every VSR sees things differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

As to your question, were the conditions the same for both SSDI and VA? I dont really see a clear cut CUE, but the stipulation that you may have entered into with VA in dropping all existing claims if awarded 100% may have closed that door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use