Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Open Claim On Inital Visit To Vamc After Discharge

Rate this question


1994andcouting.....

Question

I was reading this reg and it made me think of something I heard early on:

§4.129 Mental disorders due to traumatic stress.

When a mental disorder that develops in service as a result of a highly stressful event is severe enough to bring about the veteran’s release from active military service, the rating agency shall assign an evaluation of not less than 50 percent and schedule an examination within the six month period following the veteran’s discharge to determine whether a change in evaluation is warranted. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155)

[53 FR 23, Jan. 4, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 52700, Oct. 8, 1996]

I was thinking back to my initial visit after discharge back in 1994 to the VAMC. When I went there to get information in order to file my VA claim, I was told by the clerk that I already had an 'open claim'. ;) I was given a discharge due to a PD so I know that I wasnt rated but Im curious to know what that could have meant.

Does anyone know what he may have meant by that? Which government agency could I write to find out if I actually had an 'open claim' before I actually started the paperwork or what should I look for in my records (a code? Terminilogy,etc) that would show this?

Any help is greatly appreciated.

70% S/C PTSD/with MDD due to MST

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Yes, this is probably true; however the military seems to apply this rule only when they want to. This was the case with my discharge. Since I had just under 12 years active duty time....and had been placed on TDRL for 18 months if the military would have applied this rule to me (which they initially did); they would have had to retire me vs give me the medical discharge they did.

Obviously it's cheaper for them to discharge someone than to retire them....so right before I was booted out....they did one more "exam" and determined I was suddenly better, dropped my rating to 10% yet still said I had to be medically discharged. Oh yes....it happened. This is why I fought it clear to the Secretary of the Air Force with my argument being if I was suddenly better, why was I still being discharged? Didn't matter....I was out the door.

This was an open claim (I didn't know it at the time) and once I was discharged, the rating mysteriously went back up to 30%. Later on I submitted my papers and got the 100%.

It still angers me to no end...and always will, that the military screwed me out of the retirement that I was due. Like being victimized all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this is probably true; however the military seems to apply this rule only when they want to. This was the case with my discharge. Since I had just under 12 years active duty time....and had been placed on TDRL for 18 months if the military would have applied this rule to me (which they initially did); they would have had to retire me vs give me the medical discharge they did.

Obviously it's cheaper for them to discharge someone than to retire them....so right before I was booted out....they did one more "exam" and determined I was suddenly better, dropped my rating to 10% yet still said I had to be medically discharged. Oh yes....it happened. This is why I fought it clear to the Secretary of the Air Force with my argument being if I was suddenly better, why was I still being discharged? Didn't matter....I was out the door.

This was an open claim (I didn't know it at the time) and once I was discharged, the rating mysteriously went back up to 30%. Later on I submitted my papers and got the 100%.

It still angers me to no end...and always will, that the military screwed me out of the retirement that I was due. Like being victimized all over again.

Purple, thanks for your response. I am so sorry about what happened to you. It amazes me every time I hear (read) these stories. I hope one day I will be able to help someone who has gone through what I have gone through.

I have always held that comment (you already have an 'open claim') in the back of my mind. Back then I surely didnt know what the heck I was doing, so it kinda went in one ear and out the other. However as I get more info I keep coming back to that statement. Its funny how I dont remember much short term but I can think of something so small at times that may actually mean something. This being one of them.

Funny thing is a worker at the unemployment office is the first person to tell me to go and file. I did it not knowing that I couldnt get rated based upon the PD. But as time went on and I learned more and got my hands on more records, everything else kind of fell into place.

I guess I will go back to "Googling" ;) and see what I can come up with. :blink: :-)

Thanks again.....

70% S/C PTSD/with MDD due to MST

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1994,

You posted,

" I did it not knowing that I couldnt get rated based upon the PD."

How are you going about getting rated SC for your PD ?

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

1994,

What medical info did the Psychiatrist use to give you the PD Discharge?

Did they give you any test to see if in fact you did have a Personality Disorder? Usually they do not, if they did not.

If you could have your doctor state this:

My review of the records show no documentation which would support the diagnosis of Personality Disorder.

There simply are no data which would support that diagnosis under the criteria provided in the Diagnostic and Stastical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association.

No psychological or personality testing was done.

There was never any showing of an " enduring pattern of inner experience and behavior that deviates markedly from the expectations of the individual's culture... is inflexible and pervasive across a broad range of personal and social situations... is stable and of long duration... (and) is not better accounted for as a manifestation or consequence of another mental disorder." DSM IV TR, pages 287 - 288.

The " other mental disorder" which she clearly *DID* and *DOES *have, and for which she has been treated for xx years, is *------. *

The veteran had no childhood psychiatric, difficulties or treatment, Her xxxx disorder began during her time in service.

She has been treated for xxxxxxx for xxxx years by a number of physicians.

Betty

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1994,

You posted,

" I did it not knowing that I couldnt get rated based upon the PD."

How are you going about getting rated SC for your PD ?

carlie

Carlie,

I was discharged due to a PD however I am being treated for depression, since the service, the hard part is getting it S/C'd.

Right now, I am just trying to do some leg work in case I am denied again, that way I will know how to proceed.

70% S/C PTSD/with MDD due to MST

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1994,

What medical info did the Psychiatrist use to give you the PD Discharge?

Did they give you any test to see if in fact you did have a Personality Disorder? Usually they do not, if they did not.

If you could have your doctor state this:

My review of the records show no documentation which would support the diagnosis of Personality Disorder.

There simply are no data which would support that diagnosis under the criteria provided in the Diagnostic and Stastical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association.

No psychological or personality testing was done.

There was never any showing of an " enduring pattern of inner experience and behavior that deviates markedly from the expectations of the individual's culture... is inflexible and pervasive across a broad range of personal and social situations... is stable and of long duration... (and) is not better accounted for as a manifestation or consequence of another mental disorder." DSM IV TR, pages 287 - 288.

The " other mental disorder" which she clearly *DID* and *DOES *have, and for which she has been treated for xx years, is *------. *

The veteran had no childhood psychiatric, difficulties or treatment, Her xxxx disorder began during her time in service.

She has been treated for xxxxxxx for xxxx years by a number of physicians.

Betty

Betty, I have NO Idea what these people used and that is what bothers me so much. I mean yes things happened, but now that I know more about PTSD and MST my actions at the time SCREAM the two. I guess it was easier for them to 'label' me and get me off their hands than to actually get a good diagnosis. Which in turn made me ignore all my 'stuff' until the past year or so.

MY VA Dr. has written a letter on my behalf supporting my claim. I love the wording here as it is exactly what I was thinking, just didnt know how to word it. I sure wish I had this information before he wrote that letter. IF I have to go back and start over I am going to use this. Thanks so much for your help Betty. ;)

Edited by 1994andcouting.....

70% S/C PTSD/with MDD due to MST

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use