Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Close To 24 Million

Rate this question


Berta

Question

"Recent VA News Releases

To view and download VA news release, please visit the following

Internet address:

http://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel

Nearly 11,000 Survivors to Receive Retroactive Payments by New Years

Search for Other Eligible Survivors Continues

WASHINGTON (Dec. 24, 2008) -- The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)

has identified nearly 11,000 surviving spouses of deceased veterans who

will receive a lump-sum payment before the New Year to correct an error

in their VA benefits. Also documented were more than 73,000 who had

been previously paid. VA officials are still tracking down eligible

survivors.

"I am pleased that our task force working to correct this problem has

been able to identify this first group this week," said Secretary of

Veterans Affairs Dr. James B. Peake. "We understand the difference these

funds can make for these surviving spouses, especially during the

holiday season."

Payments will be released to these survivors on Dec. 29. The total

value of the payments is about $24 million.

At issue is a 1996 federal law that makes a surviving spouse eligible to

receive the veteran's VA compensation or pension benefit for the month

of the veteran's death. VA failed to properly implement that law in all

cases.

Most likely to have been affected by this problem are surviving spouses

who never applied for VA survivors' benefits following the death of a

veteran. Eligible for the payment are surviving spouses of veterans who

died after Dec. 31, 1996. The Department doesn't have current addresses

for many of them, which makes the process of contacting them difficult.

VA has established a special Survivor Call Center (1-800-749-8387) for

spouses who believe they may be eligible for this retroactive benefit.

The Call Center is open Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00

p.m., Central Standard Time. Inquiries may also be submitted through

the Internet at http://www.vba.va.gov/survivorsbenefit.htm. "

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • In Memoriam

The VA will not continue to cheat Widows if we all continue to stick together. This, cheating widows, is as petty as a Government Administrative Department can get. I wonder if it is coming from the bottom up, or from the top down.

With decisions made by anonymous people, and protected with the PEAKE 'No public floggings Rule', how can any oversight be done at all. There are no consequences of criminal actions if there are no names to connect them.

There needs to be a name connected to the crime even if the criminal says that she/he can't remember.

The VA has a diffusion of responsibility. (link ) that allows them to violate their own laws.

Once again the VA Genovese Syndrome (bystander effect) is in operation. Don't know who Sue Genovese was?

Please check out this Genovese Syndrome.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitty_Genovese

Examples

  • Kitty Genovese, a New York woman, was stabbed to death near her apartment. The New York Times reported "Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police," blaming social apathy.
  • In a firing squad, one of the shooters may be randomly issued a weapon containing a blank cartridge rather than a bullet. This allows each of the members of the firing squad to believe that he did not fire a fatal shot.
  • In some electric chairs there are many switches, only one of which is connected. The executioners may then choose to believe that they pulled a non-functional switch.
  • This phenomenon also applies to much more mundane circumstances, such as cleaning and maintenance of shared space/items or unassigned work in large organizations getting neglected.

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Danang made a good point-

my husband's last 30% comp check came the same month he died (for the previous month)

VA whipped it out of our checking immediately when I called to report his death.

Then they posthumously award 100% P & T for 3 years prior to death- 3 1/2 years later-

I cant figure out if they owe me or not-

he died before the reg on this was published- so maybe not-

BTW all- when the VA makes an accrued award-the survivors is now eligible for ALL of the accrued benefits if the vet died after Dec 2003 (Bonny V Principi)

For deaths prior to Bonny they save money if there is over 2 years in accrued this way-

although the deceased vet might have an accrued payment much larger then the 2 years due the survivor-for deaths prior to Dec 2003-

they send the survivor the 2 years retro accrued based on the cheapest 2 years-not the successive- to-death 2 years.

Since this only involves a cola or two they save-or perhaps some dependents accrued as well- still

this is one more way -if you add up the fact that they have done this to numerous survivors-that the VA keeps money by manipulating the two years period they will use for accrued.

I dont think they can do this under the new Bonny Regs but every single thing I ever got from VA -to include my award letters- all had errors I had to fight with NOD or CUEs.

And as I mentioned they made an enormous error when they did send me the CUE amount that the RC awarded.

The financial breakdown of the CUE offset award looked so legitimate I almost didnt question it but had I not questioned it they would have saved over 11,000 bucks.

We need to carefully assess every singlee thing they send- particularily retro amounts.

PS-VA says the checks are in the mail- that is on Dec 29th:

http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfdec08/nf122408-8.htm

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Danang made a good point-

my husband's last 30% comp check came the same month he died (for the previous month)

VA whipped it out of our checking immediately when I called to report his death. quote]

Berta, my husband just died last week, does that mean the VA will take back his December direct deposit?

Edited by morgan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morgan -I just replied to your other post -such very sad news-

No the VA is not supposed to take that last check out of your checking account at all!

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

There is a law that covers this in 38 U.S.C. that concerns a 100% rating and the month of death. My mom used it to get benefits for the month my dad died. He was 100% at the time of his death.

Danang made a good point-

my husband's last 30% comp check came the same month he died (for the previous month)

VA whipped it out of our checking immediately when I called to report his death.

Then they posthumously award 100% P & T for 3 years prior to death- 3 1/2 years later-

I cant figure out if they owe me or not-

he died before the reg on this was published- so maybe not-

BTW all- when the VA makes an accrued award-the survivors is now eligible for ALL of the accrued benefits if the vet died after Dec 2003 (Bonny V Principi)

For deaths prior to Bonny they save money if there is over 2 years in accrued this way-

although the deceased vet might have an accrued payment much larger then the 2 years due the survivor-for deaths prior to Dec 2003-

they send the survivor the 2 years retro accrued based on the cheapest 2 years-not the successive- to-death 2 years.

Since this only involves a cola or two they save-or perhaps some dependents accrued as well- still

this is one more way -if you add up the fact that they have done this to numerous survivors-that the VA keeps money by manipulating the two years period they will use for accrued.

I dont think they can do this under the new Bonny Regs but every single thing I ever got from VA -to include my award letters- all had errors I had to fight with NOD or CUEs.

And as I mentioned they made an enormous error when they did send me the CUE amount that the RC awarded.

The financial breakdown of the CUE offset award looked so legitimate I almost didnt question it but had I not questioned it they would have saved over 11,000 bucks.

We need to carefully assess every singlee thing they send- particularily retro amounts.

PS-VA says the checks are in the mail- that is on Dec 29th:

http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfdec08/nf122408-8.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use