Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Got The Decision Today. Good News, But.

Rate this question


OldDave

Question

I applied in July for SC for DMII as a result of AO exposure with CAD and HBP as secondary. The award letter gives me 20% for DMII, 60% for CAD and 10% for each limb for PN. VA math = 80% total. The HBP was denied. The 60% for CAD is because the VA Echocardiogram Tech at the C&P gave me an Ejection Fraction of 40%. No stress test necessary. I got a copy of my C&P exam report. Blood work also showed a Creatinine level of 1.6. This indicates possible kidney problems. The award letter states the VA will be sending me for more tests to determine if the kidney disease is SC by way of being secondary to DMII.

Back in April of 2007 my cardiologist did an Echo and Nuke Stress test and called it EF = 72% and METS = 6. Needless to say the EF drop from 72 to 40 and Creatinine level worried me. I had an appointment with my pvt doctor last Monday and told him of my concerns. He ordered an Echo for Tuesday and a 24 hr protein test for next Monday. I don't have the offical results for the echo yet, but the tech told me it would run about 60%. I'm hopeing the protein test shows no problems and no reason for the VA to have to make another decision.

What would be the best way to notify the VA of the error? I plan on filing a NOD to argue that the HBP IS secondary to DMII. Would including it in the NOD be the best way? Once they accept the posibility that the EF is greater than 50% the will want to do a stress test. Maybe I should notify them immediately so that they can schedule a stress along with the kidney tests. I think the stress would reveal METS between 5 and 7, in line with what my cardiologist got. This would yield a rating of 30%. This is what I think it should be. But, what if the VA blows the stress test as well and gives me highter METS and I end up with a rating of 10%. I want to do the right thing, but I don't want to shot myself in the foot.

Any advice would be greatly appriciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

Sorry for my ignorance. What is CAD? Not sure if you are also having ED symptoms. If so, you can file a claim for ED as secondary to DM-II.

bob_abad,

CAD is Coronary Artery Disease. And you can claim ED as secondary to DM-II. The award letter they sent me listed ED as service connected through DM-II. But, they didn't award any compension for it.

OldDave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

When I applied for VA Service Connection for panic disorder that in 4 months Social Security put me on disability I figured that the VA would look at the evidence in my SMR's, the reports from my VA Doctors, the Medical Opinions of several Doctors and after the years rolled by I came to the conclusion that the VA was not my friend and my friends it looked like war to me.

As far as ethics go I feel that it is wrong to lie or answer a direct question with a lie. It is ok to not answer the question and to do anything that helps your claim.

I think it would have been a grave mistake of any claimant to NOD a claim to point out that the VA made a mistake. The VA makes millions of mistakes some very large and some small. The VA had medical records and made their decision. When did anyone here except for very few really be in the position to correct the VA and no it is not taking from another Veteran.

I think Old Dave did a good job of putting out a concern and getting a lot of differnt answers and now he can make his own decision

I vote for let sleeping dogs lie just don't tell any lies yourself.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

"I want to do the right thing, but I don't want to shot myself in the foot. Any advice would be greatly appriciated." OldDave.]

Good Morning OldDave, Thanks for posting this topic. We had a spirited discussion yesterday. I hope it helped you with your question. rentalguy1 and Pete53 summed it up well. I wanted to revisit this thread to add a post script about my experience disagreeing with the VA's higher rating and having it lowered. Mine was for PTSD. Many decades ago, when I, and the rest of the country, was concerned with the stigma associated with the condition, I fought successfully to have the rating reduced. Denial, and career decisions along with having a bad day at the C&P exam played a part in my thinking at the time. Upon my notification and without a C&P do-over, the VA granted my request for a lower % rate. Recently, after my CRSC retirement was awarded by the Army, I found that the VA miscoded my combat related PTSD. When I asked the VA to correct the diagnostic code # to reflect combat PTSD. They reopened my old PTSD claim as a new claim. I was willing to let it ride with just a code# correction, however since the VA wishes to reopen that can of worms and will not just correct the code#, I included an increase in the rating, as well.

Again, I wish you the very best for a happy and successful New Year. May you have many more.

Edited by Commander Bob 92-93

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use