Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Appeal Whlie Waiting Decision On New Evidence

Rate this question


Signal6

Question

This site is great, I am so glad I found it. Dealing with the VA is a nightmare and I appreciate the support everyone offers on this site.

Ok, I was wounded in Iraq, April 2005. I filed my initial claim in Dec 2006 as soon as I returned. My initial rating was 30%, but they rated my sinusitis and allergic rhinitis at 0%. I wrote them and sent in additional evidence and they increased it to 10%, 40% total. I filed at notice of disagreement and received an answer from a DRO in Nov 2007. I replied to the answer and said I still disagreed and sent them new medical records from my on going sinus problems. I just sent in more records from the Miami VA and my private doc.

So, my question is did I wait to long to file an appeal for my sinusitis and allergic rhinitis? I sent them 11 records of sinusitis in one year (2005) and also a CT scan revealing polyps in my sinuses (2006) but they ignored both. the DRO only counted 4 records for sinunsitis and said the CT scan wasn't an absolute diagnosis for polyps because a VA doctor at C&P didn't see them during a visit. It would be kind of hard to see poylps within the sinusis with out an MRI or CT scan,but that is what they said.

Second question, if it isn't to late, should i wait until they review the new evidence I sent in (records from 2008 for 8 episodes of sinusitis and another CT scan from VA showing polyps in the sinusis)?

Thanks again

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

You will receive much more comprehensive advise from this board, but I would like to offer that the review of new and material evidence takes a long time...at least it has in my case.

It has been more than one year since I submitted my new and material evidence...

Good luck,

Ron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not file anything else -- unless asked --

until I got a decision. At this point it will just

muck everything up and take longer for a decision.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How soon did you reply to the DRO's decision dated November 2007? It sounds like you disagreed timely to the DRO's decision, and your next step would have been to file an appeal with the Board of Veterans Appeals in Washington, D.C. Do you recall doing that?

If that's the case, you can continue sending in more evidence if you have it up until the point that the Board reaches a decision.

I guess I'm not seeing a clear picture of the timeline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I replied that I disagreed but I did not file an appeal to the Board of Veterans Appeals. Wondering if I still have that option, or did I wait to long?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You need to find out the status of your claim. You usually have one year to appeal to the BVA via a Form 9 after a decision from the DRO or any other decision maker at the VA. I got a DRO Review and it was negative on an issue, and then I asked for a Personal Hearing with the DRO. This all took more than a year. I did not go to the BVA, but I exceeded the one year time limit from my first DRO decision and yet I still got a hearing at the VARO and a decision. When a claim gets to the DRO it seems the time factor gets lost as well as some evidence. The rule, however, as I understand it is one year from the time of a decision to go to the BVA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Signal

You have a year from the decision to file a NOD. It sounds like you did that within the year.

There are two exceptions to the "one year rule"

Exception 1. In the Event of Clear Unmistakable Error, the one year limit does not apply. CUE is a higher stand than a conventional appeal..it is a collateral attack upon the decision. However, if they ignored evidence, that is an example that meets CUE standards. Read the stuff on CUE on Hadit.

Exception 2. An exception to the one year rule is made in the event of multiple appeals.

Someone else may be able to post the link to these rules, I could find them if no one else comes up with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use