Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Appeal Whlie Waiting Decision On New Evidence

Rate this question


Signal6

Question

This site is great, I am so glad I found it. Dealing with the VA is a nightmare and I appreciate the support everyone offers on this site.

Ok, I was wounded in Iraq, April 2005. I filed my initial claim in Dec 2006 as soon as I returned. My initial rating was 30%, but they rated my sinusitis and allergic rhinitis at 0%. I wrote them and sent in additional evidence and they increased it to 10%, 40% total. I filed at notice of disagreement and received an answer from a DRO in Nov 2007. I replied to the answer and said I still disagreed and sent them new medical records from my on going sinus problems. I just sent in more records from the Miami VA and my private doc.

So, my question is did I wait to long to file an appeal for my sinusitis and allergic rhinitis? I sent them 11 records of sinusitis in one year (2005) and also a CT scan revealing polyps in my sinuses (2006) but they ignored both. the DRO only counted 4 records for sinunsitis and said the CT scan wasn't an absolute diagnosis for polyps because a VA doctor at C&P didn't see them during a visit. It would be kind of hard to see poylps within the sinusis with out an MRI or CT scan,but that is what they said.

Second question, if it isn't to late, should i wait until they review the new evidence I sent in (records from 2008 for 8 episodes of sinusitis and another CT scan from VA showing polyps in the sinusis)?

Thanks again

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Time lines:

from original decision to file a NOD - 1 year

from response to NOD by the DRO to file your form 9 for a formal appeal - 60 days

If the DRO changes your decision and issues a rating decision say from 0 percent to 10 percent then you once again have one year to file a NOD against that rating decision.

However, if your rating decision issued an award of say 0 percent and your submit a NOD and then the DRO continues that decision at 0 percent then you only have 60 days to formalize your appeal via the form 9.

It looks like you missed that 60 day period. However, since you sent in a letter saying you still disagreed - and if you sent in additional evidence after the 60 day period they may re-open the claim if the evidence is new and material.

Or if you have an easy going DRO he/she may have accepted your letter as your formal appeal. Does not happen often but it does happen. As posted below you need to call and find out the status of your claim and then go from there.

Just keep in mind for future reference - one year to file your NOD after the rating and if the DRO continues the denial or same level of award you only have 60 days to perfect your appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

"CT scan wasn't an absolute diagnosis for polyps because a VA doctor at C&P didn't see them during a visit."

HA! weakest excuse I've heard! When and if everything else fails, this might be a case for CUE. I'd at least get "new evidence" in the form of an IMO and an exam by a rated specialist. What was the C&P drs specialty, and how did the dr do the exam sinus exam. Material evidence of fact outweighs an opinion. Now, if the C&P doctor said it was not service connected, that is a different kettle to fight over.

This site is great, I am so glad I found it. Dealing with the VA is a nightmare and I appreciate the support everyone offers on this site.

Ok, I was wounded in Iraq, April 2005. I filed my initial claim in Dec 2006 as soon as I returned. My initial rating was 30%, but they rated my sinusitis and allergic rhinitis at 0%. I wrote them and sent in additional evidence and they increased it to 10%, 40% total. I filed at notice of disagreement and received an answer from a DRO in Nov 2007. I replied to the answer and said I still disagreed and sent them new medical records from my on going sinus problems. I just sent in more records from the Miami VA and my private doc.

So, my question is did I wait to long to file an appeal for my sinusitis and allergic rhinitis? I sent them 11 records of sinusitis in one year (2005) and also a CT scan revealing polyps in my sinuses (2006) but they ignored both. the DRO only counted 4 records for sinunsitis and said the CT scan wasn't an absolute diagnosis for polyps because a VA doctor at C&P didn't see them during a visit. It would be kind of hard to see poylps within the sinusis with out an MRI or CT scan,but that is what they said.

Second question, if it isn't to late, should i wait until they review the new evidence I sent in (records from 2008 for 8 episodes of sinusitis and another CT scan from VA showing polyps in the sinusis)?

Thanks again

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the all information, I really appreciate it.

The funny part of this, they quoted the primary care PA because he didn't see polyps during routine exam, as the reason for demial. I don't think he even looked up my nose, as if you could see them in the sinuses anyway. The good part is, I am already SC 10% for chronic sinusitis and allergic rhinitis. Now they just need to accept the evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe it. I got home today and there was the infamous Yellow Envelope from the VA. Low and behold, they upgraded my rating to 30% for my chronic sinusitis and allergic rhinitis. It appears someone actual read the CT scan report and noted the polyps. I can honestly say this is one of the happiest and most surprising days i have had in a long time.

However, I do have one question. The end of the Supplemental Statement of the Case says, "because there is likelihood of improvement, this evaluation is not considered permanent and is subject to routine future examination in January 2011. I understand this means i will be going back to C&P for an exam in Jan 2011, anything else I should know about this, or what else it means?

Thanks

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Congrats! ok, until 2011 more than likely you will be rechecked for a continuing condition of the same. If polyps are mentioned, I suspect as much the thinking there could be medical 'cure' or 'treatment' to help the condition improve (or get worse?). Read, ask questions, could be you disagree, or they missed something. Now is the time to check out what was really decided on your behalf.

Best to ya,

CG'up2009

p.s. you may want to post the decision here, for possible other advice.extra eyes that care.

I can't believe it. I got home today and there was the infamous Yellow Envelope from the VA. Low and behold, they upgraded my rating to 30% for my chronic sinusitis and allergic rhinitis. It appears someone actual read the CT scan report and noted the polyps. I can honestly say this is one of the happiest and most surprising days i have had in a long time.

However, I do have one question. The end of the Supplemental Statement of the Case says, "because there is likelihood of improvement, this evaluation is not considered permanent and is subject to routine future examination in January 2011. I understand this means i will be going back to C&P for an exam in Jan 2011, anything else I should know about this, or what else it means?

Thanks

Tom

Edited by cowgirl

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use