Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Do You Think This Will Help Veterans?

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Moderator

What if..

We hadit members elected a great spokesperson...Names like Berta, Tbird, Rental guy come to mind. This spokesperson has a webcam, and knows how or will get help posting a "you tube" video.

Then, this person posts a You tube Video with a title something like, "How can the VA do this to our Veterans?"

Then, this person states "our" case TO THE PUBLIC. It would need to be someone with writing skills, and maybe public speaking skills, since many Vets dont have those skills, our spokesperson will represent us..not the DAV, not the VFW, not Congressman Hall, but someone whose opinion we think most accurately represents VETRANS. I even think maybe this person should meet with Mr. Shinseki, or even Mr. Obama to tell OUR SIDE of the story.

Berta did a good job of that already, I thought at the March 3 hearing. I just think we need to put the pressure on with a you tube video..gee, it may even help to get someone to watch it if we get a great looking woman to be on the video, also!

Kind of like creating our own Veterans organization, "Hadit"

Tell me what you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

Belle..

I sent you a PM. I think you would be perfect to do a video on the VA. Not only are you passionate about Veterans rights, but, if your picture says anything, you are gorgeous, and people would watch the video just to see you.

Carlie

Yes, and I certainly appreciate Tbird and other advocates of Veterans rights, and I thank you all for doing this for us. I am just guessing that if we got a great video done on Veterans rights posted, on Youtube or CNN (as Belle pointed out), that if enough people saw it, then the politicians and VA would have no choice but to listen to us due to media pressure.

CVSP

Yes, good companies and even good governments listen to their "customers", and make changes to please them. The VA has resisted positive changes, and insisted on doing things using their old, broken method. The idea is that if the you tube was popular enough and enough people saw it, our government can ignore one or two mad Veterans, but how about one or two million mad people? Politicians know they cant ignore a million people and stay in office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading Broncos response we are dealing with an organization that is using technologies from the 70s (still paper based etc, clatter of teletypes when you call the 800 number. With that said do you think anyone within the VA would even know how to work Youtube?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

The VA does not need to watch the video! Frankly, my guess is that if enough other people watch it,

the VA is going to be pressured into responding, by the public and by politicians.

We all know there is no requirement to be able to read to be a rating specialist, you need only know which rubber stamp is "Claim Denied" to qualify as a rating specialist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

I think the "Claim Approved" rubber stamp was "accidently" shredded, to prevent its indiscriminate use

by new employees unfamiliar with the :angry: which is REQUIRED to be put on the "Claim Denied" rubber stamp, according to USC 38 Sec. 1.(non public laws), which states:

"After the RO has delayed the claim for as long as possible, the rating service representative supervisor will demonstrate how the "Claim Denied" rubber stamp is to be utilized for new employees who are unable to read. A 1.5 inch yellow smiley face is to be attached to each "Claim Denied" rubber stamp to keep it from being confused with the "Claim is at the rating board" rubber stamp. Or, was it the other way around, I forget which. All employees are strictly required to adhere to this policy, except in cases of family and friends of management with large retros."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adding my 2 cents worth.

I think this is a bad idea. YouTube is not known to be a credible source of information....kind of like Wikipedia...whoever can post whatever and call it "fact". Is this what you really want Hadit associated with?

Also, to say that this reflects all Hadit members is a false statement unless everyone agrees or only the names of those who agree or who are affected are used.

So, to answer the question of the initial post...no, I do not think this will help...I believe it will only draw negative attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use