Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Shrink Say She Will Get A Veteran A C&p Only If He

Rate this question


Hoppy

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

As many of you are aware I was trained in industrial injury claims. No competent attorney would take a case to court with one medical exam from the employer’s doctor or agree in advance to base the entire claim on a report written by a doctor chosen at random without even giving any consideration to the logic or reasons cited by the examiner.

The RO has told the veteran that to re-open his claim he needs to get new and material evidence. The veteran then goes to his VA shrink. The shrink has not been cooperative and now is trying to blackmail the veteran into agreeing to lock himself into a C&P examiners determination in exchange for her effort to get him a C&P exam.

I really think that this shrink is trying to stop this veteran from getting involved in a long drawn out battle because she thinks that the battle is compounding his condition. I cannot argue that this is not true. We all know how frustrating a battle with the VA can get.

I do not think this shrink realizes how messed up the C&P exams can get. Additionally, what this shrink does not realize is that we never intended to depend on the C&P process to begin with. Trying to get a C&P was plan “B” from the get go. Plan “A” is to get an IMO.

Getting an IMO from a doctor chosen at random is also a problem. I have been of the opinion that industrial injury and Social Security attorney’s work closely with doctors who are favorable to the plaintiff. These lawyers only get paid when they win. They are not going to send their claimants to see doctors who write reports favorable for the defense. I have actually sat in the offices of attorney’s that were on the phone telling doctors what the reports need to address.

I recently talked with a social security attorney who has agreed to refer me to his doctors. I will keep hadit posted on how this goes. If this works out then I would suggest that people seeking IMO’s get referrals from a SSD attorney. Choosing doctors at random can be problematic.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Hoppy, I think your shrink is wrong. Mine went out of thier way to write me a letter and encouraged me to file which I was not sure I would do, it took me 8 months to complete it.

I hope you get your IMO.

Best of Luck

Ruby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Ruby,

I agree, I had no problem with some VA doctors. Using the VA is hit and mis at best. Doctors can have a bias like anybody else.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

The RO sounds more like an Insurance Claims Adjuster. Offering deals is not the RO or the Doctors job. Monty Hall, from lets make a deal, is not the way it works. A Vet has a right to an IMO, otherwise it is just a big one-sided game show.

I am looking for a Urologist now. Seems the ones in my area are affiliated with the VA in some way. I am not looking for a QTC co-signer, from a mini VA clinic. I need help from a real doctor.

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

I agree with Hoppy! I dont think it should be this way, tho! A Veteran should be able to get a

"fair shake" from his/her C&P examination. The obvious problem is that "so called doctors" at the C&P are compensated by the VA by QTC, and this is a conflict of interest with the usual result being that the Veteran is the Victim. Doc makes money, QTC earns huge profits charging the VA $499 for an exam that should cost about $100, and the Veteran looses his benefits. Obviously, the VA makes money..for $499 they can "shut up" the Veteran and deny his benefits based on "medical opinions".

In the SSD industry, I can pick my physician, and, as Hoppy pointed out, my lawyer could direct me to a physician known to be Pro-claimant.

The only way to right this injustice, IMHO, is for the Veteran to pick the C&P examiner, NOT the VA. It is just too large of a conflict of interest for the VA NOT to take advantage of this, and they do, regurarly. This is a lot of the reason why more deserving Veterans are denied benefits, and less deserving Veterans are awarded benefits, in many cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C & P exams are requested by the VA Regional office. The exam is either done at the VAMC C&P or by QTC. This is based on the area in which the veteran lives. No matter which one does the exam, they are paid by the Regional Office for the examinations. When you referance health care and benefits they are two completely different organizations. The doctor cannot get the patient a C&P exam. She can, however, give him/her a medical opinion or IMO.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

my PTSD claim was done by the VA entirely I had the same pyschiatrist from Jan 2003 thru now, I was denied the inpatient program based on their determination that I was to sick and on to many narcotics to be admitted to the domicillary nor could I walk to the mess hall as it was to far away.

I was given 2 C&P exams one in 2005 when they awarded me 50% and then again in 2006 when they awarded me the 100% P&T after I filed the NOD in 2005 due to the fact I felt and my shrink felt that the 50% was a lowball award since his treatment records constantly had the comment "this patient is considered to be totally and permanently disabled due to his PTSD symptoms, regardless of any other outstanding medical issues" I do not feel this patient will ever improve and become employable in the future.

I never had to use an IMO for mental health, now my cardiac issues are something else, and I have 3 IMO's

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use