Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Got The Envelope

Rate this question


MARINEVET

Question

Today I got the envelope containing the results of my appeal to the BVA and July 21, 2008 remand that was sent to the Huntington Regional Office. The VA granted my claim for SC Major Depressive Disorder at 50% for the period of November 1, 2004 through November 1, 2008. They granted 70% for the period of November 1, 2008 to present. The letter stated to the effect that I could expect to see a check for the back pay in about 15 days. Thanks to everyone for all of the advice I have been given and the encouragement.

Semper FI, Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Use the date that the VA knew you were unemployed due to the disorder as the date you ask for TDIU. Why did the VA decide you got worse in 2008? Was there some big factor that tipped you from 50% to 70%? Lots of time the VA will rate you 30-50% when your symptoms are the same as when you finally get rated 70-100% with no explanation except that you are now unemployed due to the SC condition.

The tipping factor in 2008 was the results of the C&P Examiantion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a crock- you got higher level of PTSD at a C & P exam-

this is a trick VA uses to get out of paying a staged rating-

The C & P exam was based on ypur condition up to date of C & P exam-so there must have been enough evidence prior to that date to award TDIU-

you can fight that EED-

do you get SSA for the same SC disability?

The VA does that to DMII vets sometimes-

yeah right- if they got DMII at a C & P exam they should sue VA for misdiagnosis nd malpractice if the VA recs revealed they already had DMII.

But they can win more EED if they NOD.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Fight for the EED since the only difference in your condition was the exam. This is a dirty trick as Berta says. This is how they cheat vets out of thousands of dollars with these baseless staged ratings. I had a rating in 1973 that was based on the same evidence and diagnosis as the rating I got 30 years later. I got 10% for the one in 1972 and 70% for the one in 2002. I got 30% in 1995 when I was actually better than in 1972.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fight for the EED since the only difference in your condition was the exam. This is a dirty trick as Berta says. This is how they cheat vets out of thousands of dollars with these baseless staged ratings. I had a rating in 1973 that was based on the same evidence and diagnosis as the rating I got 30 years later. I got 10% for the one in 1972 and 70% for the one in 2002. I got 30% in 1995 when I was actually better than in 1972.

Thanks for pointing that out. I never thought of the effictive date issue until you and Bertha brought it up. I will be looking into an EED and am currently in the process of filing for PTIU. You got to love this site. Once again thanks for the valuable advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a crock- you got higher level of PTSD at a C & P exam-

this is a trick VA uses to get out of paying a staged rating-

The C & P exam was based on ypur condition up to date of C & P exam-so there must have been enough evidence prior to that date to award TDIU-

you can fight that EED-

do you get SSA for the same SC disability?

The VA does that to DMII vets sometimes-

yeah right- if they got DMII at a C & P exam they should sue VA for misdiagnosis nd malpractice if the VA recs revealed they already had DMII.

But they can win more EED if they NOD.

Yes Berta I get SSDI and have for a couple years now. As I stated in my reply to John, I am in the process of requesting PTIU and now that you have brought the EED to my attention I will be requesting that too. Thank you all for being here with your valuable knowledge. I would have never thought to have asked for the EED if you had not brough to my attention. Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually the award the date they got the TDIU claim for EED- however if you get SSA solely for PTSD you can one year and maybe even more prior to their EED for TDIU.( I am not sure of the more part)

I had personal experience with that-

husband-30%SC but filed for higher SC %-1993

SSA awards for solely PTSD 1993

1997 VA awards 100% P & T for PTSD= retro date -same date as SSA award,1991 - 2 years prior to his filing the claim.

He was dead for 3 years already by then.

First 38 CFR stated I was eligible for one year of his retro.The VA farted around with this claim for so long that the regs changed- they had to send me two years retro-

I filed claim under a new reg Bonny V Principi for the additional year-I think they made a paper airplane out of that claim-

Now a widow gets ALL retro if SC death is after this new reg date which I forget when-

They now owe me that additional retro year due to the Nehmer court order.My Bonny claim is moot.But it was fun.

I still think the OGC should have decided- with a Pres op- the premise of that claim.

Usually the award the date they got the TDIU claim for EED- however if you get SSA solely for PTSD you can one year and maybe even more prior to their EED for TDIU.( I am not sure of the more part)

I had personal experience with that-

husband-30%SC but filed for higher SC %-1993

SSA awards for solely PTSD 1993

1997 VA awards 100% P & T for PTSD= retro date -same date as SSA award,1991 - 2 years prior to his filing the claim.

He was dead for 3 years already by then.

First 38 CFR stated I was eligible for one year of his retro.The VA farted around with this claim for so long that the regs changed- they had to send me two years retro-

I filed claim under a new reg Bonny V Principi for the additional year-I think they made a paper airplane out of that claim-

Now a widow gets ALL retro if SC death is after this new reg date which I forget when-

They now owe me that additional retro year due to the Nehmer court order.My Bonny claim is moot.But it was fun.

I still think the OGC should have decided- with a Pres op- the premise of that claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use