Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cue

Rate this question


Tao

Question

Hi all!! Great site and nice people. I have been lurking for a while and doing a lot of research on a CUE that I think I have, maybe you guys can help me and give me your opinions.

Well it all started in 1999 when I got discharged for a left shoulder injury that left me with a dislocated shoulder. I was awarded 20% at that time for recurrent shoulder dislocation. Well in 2002 I was feeling some strange sensations on my left arm and immediatly went to my private Dr. Uppon examination he felt that my frequent dislocation were pulling on my Brachial plexus nerve and ordered a EMG & NCV test done. The results were what the Dr. expected and he Dx me with brachial plexus syndrome. So in late 2002 I went to my VARO and filed a claim for brachial plexus secondary to my shoulder dislocation. Maybe 2 month later I was scheduled for a C&P visit and I told the Dr. my symptoms and gave him a copy of my EMG results, a month later I receved a letter denying the brachial plexus syndrom. They based their decision saying that my condition was already awarded on the initial 20% that I got in 1999. I was dissapointed but left it like that( i was 26 years old and did not know anything about the VA and their tricks).

Recently Ive been getting informed and read lots of people giving advice to other veterans to request a copy of their C-Files and so I requested mine. Looking thru my file I came across the decision made in 1999 and all the progress notes talked only about the shoulder dislocation, nothing in regards to the neurological condition regardin the brachial plexus. So I immediatle took the C-File to my Dr. who has been treating me since day one. He studied the case and told me that he could not figure out were the VA links the brachial plexus to the shoulder dislocation back in 1999. He then proceeded to tell me that the VA was doing something wrong because the brachial plexus was a secondary condition to the shoulder dislocation and that none of the symptoms associated with a brachial plexus were not present at the time of the evaluation in 1999.

What do you guys think??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Berta,

The Dr. wrote a full IMO stating that my condition was developed because of the frequent dislocations and therefore injurying the brachial plexus with time.

Even on my last check up in 2008 the Neurologists at the VA told me he thought it was weird that I was not rated with a brachial plexus injury, I did not think much of it at that time but once i received my C-File and saw that all the Dr's that I have seen on my C&P examinations wrote on their progress notes that brachial symptoms were present I got a litle suspicious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did the doctor give a full medical rationale to link this condition as 'more than likely" or " as least as likely as not" to your SC condition?

The VA hangs on these specific phrases- they dont understand medical lingo that-in essense-says the same thing- but does not word it in words that VA is used to.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It might be better to just reopen the old shoulder claim and ask for more money based on increased disability. Then pursue the CUE. CUE can be a will of the Wisp. Perhaps focus on now and then go after CUE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did the doctor give a full medical rationale to link this condition as 'more than likely" or " as least as likely as not" to your SC condition?

The VA hangs on these specific phrases- they dont understand medical lingo that-in essense-says the same thing- but does not word it in words that VA is used to.

He did not use those words in specific, his not up to date with the VA lingo. What he did write was somewhere between the line of "he definitely deserves to be awarded a disability compensation for this neurological condition"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might be better to just reopen the old shoulder claim and ask for more money based on increased disability. Then pursue the CUE. CUE can be a will of the Wisp. Perhaps focus on now and then go after CUE.

John, I went to my DAV rep. and at the beginning thats what he wanted to do and i was ok with it, but once he saw the case with my C-File and the medical report I brought him he then told me to go for the CUE. I know that winning a CUE is like winning the lottery, one in a million chance, but I think that I have the evidence in my C-File and honestly if you read the report in wich the decision was based for the brachial plexus (1999) evaluation it even goes as far as saying that "sensation is intact, Hand grip strenght is normal, peripheral pulses are intact. Basically no nerve damage.

So with this in mind, how can they say the brachial is part of this condition when I did not show any signs of nerve damage in that evaluation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use