Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Forget It

Rate this question


Jayg

Question

Forget it. B)

Edited by Jayg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

After my initial intake into the VAMC in Dallas and waiting and waiting I decided I was at War with the VA. I knew that to them I was just another number to deal with. No one read my C File but me unless they were trying to deny me and they also made a lot of chit up to suit their purposes. I was really surprised about the lies that they wrote in my file about what I refused to do. I bet over the years I refused a prostate exam I never heard of over a dozen times.The fact is seeing thousands of Veterans a month does not allow time for a proper examination.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

RELAX.....

There is nothing in that C&P to get bent out of shape over. There is no malicious intent anywhere in that document. There is nothing harmful to your claim in there, with one exception. I take it that you actually have been prescribed orthopedic shoes and/or inserts. If this is the case, write a 21-4138 explaining this to the rater, and attach copies of the medical records that prove this fact. It is hard to get more than a 10%-30% rating for foot problems (from what I have seen) and it looks like that is about where you fall with this C&P.

It looks to me like the examiner tried their best to be thorough and cover their butt, but they missed as much in your medical records and they found. Again, though, nothing harmful to you in there. If I were you, I would not go to your congress person as that would slow things down considerably. Just write a statement, send in the supporting records, and go back into waiting mode for a few months.

Good luck

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you really want to fight this you are going to have to get a podiatrist or orthopod to do an IMO for you. I am surprised the VA did not say that all your problems are due to your weight. Since everything to do with this kind of disability is based on ROM you need help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Flat feet ratings have nothing to do with ROM. They ave everything to do with structural deformities and subjective complaints of pain:

5276 Flatfoot, acquired:

Pronounced; marked pronation, extreme tenderness of plantar

surfaces of the feet, marked inward displacement and severe spasm

of the tendo achillis on manipulation, not improved by orthopedic

shoes or appliances:

Bilateral 50 ,.,, ,,,,.,,,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,, , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 50

Unilateral 30

Severe; objective evidence of marked deformity (pronation,

abduction, etc.), pain on manipulation and use accentuated,

indication of swelling on use, characteristic callosities:

Bilateral 30

Unilateral 20 , ,, ,,,,,,,,,,, 20

Moderate; weight-bearing line over or medial to great toe, inward

bowing of the tendo achillis, pain on manipulation and use of

the feet, bilateral or unilateral 10

Mild: symptoms relieved by built-up shoe or arch support 0

I am almost positive that you will fall under either the moderate (most likely) or severe, bilateral category, based upon statements the examiner made in the physical examination portion of the exam. This is also why it is very important that you include evidence of being prescribed foot orthotics, and their failure to alleviate your problem.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The C&P exam said "mild pes planus". I don't think you get to 30% with that diagnosis. That is why I say get an IMO. The C&P doctor points to his impression that there is no explanation of how the flat feet contribute to the vet's other problems. This exam is weak. You need an exam that says your knees, back are connected to the flat feet and how this has happened over the years. The way to get a higher rating overall is to also go to a shrink and get a diagnosis of chronic pain due to general medical condition. If you say you can't work,and I believe,you then you need more than flat feet to get there. The C&P doctors exam is not tight. There is room for raters to just run all over you. You could work at a sedentary job with flat feet and that is what the VA will probably say if you are going for IU. Don't fight with the VA over their half ass exam. Get one of your own that nails it. I have foot problems as well and it can disable you, but doctors seems to think unless you can't walk you have minor problems. I have PN and my feet swell and burn and hurt but I only got 10%, and I can't even get my shoes on at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned in a post several months ago that I saw a C & P exam pre-typed on an examiner's computer, and he was filling in the blanks. There's certain canned text that is part of the C & P exam. The examiner is supposed to change it if it doesn't apply, but they often overlook it.

I saw it with my own eyes while accompanying my husband to a C & P exam. Canned text includes phraseology about how the veteran looks, how he traveled to the exam, how the veteran behaves in speech and action, etc.

I saw it myself. Blocks of text pre-typed, with blank lines to be filled in.

That's part of the reason why C & P exams often state things or repeated statements that never happened or were never made, respectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use