Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ao & Dm@ Ref Extract

Rate this question


Chuck75

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

The attached extract from the VBA/DOD DM Treatment Guide documents a medical fact often ignored in decisions denying service connection for conditions caused or aggravated by DM2. Many of these conditions commonly occur as first symptoms of a case of DM2, well before a "formal DM2 diagnosis is made.

extract_critical.txt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Great reference Chuck !

DMII doesn't kill anyone-but it's complications do.

The words diabetes or DMII never appeared in my husband's VA medical records.

My daughter insisted I re-open the death claim in 2003 and I was shocked by the evidence I found-

by then I had become more aware of DMII from AO due to the fact it had gone on the Presumptive list and more and more DMII vets were filing claims.

He showed documented symptoms of diabetes mellitus for the entire 6 years of his VA medical care.

Those symptoms-untreated and undiagnosed as due to diabetes caused his totally disabling strokes and heart disease.

I succeeded in the FTCA case by proving the VA had misdiagnosed these conditions- but I never knew what really caused them until I re-opened the claim.

The ADA around the same time started to publish extensive info and even had commercials on diabetes.

It is one of the most misdiagnosed conditions in America-often not diagnosed at all until someone has a major stroke or heart attack and then the blood work and testing reveals the diabetes.

I think every veteran should be given a free diabetes glucose monitor from the VA to use daily and keep a diary of their readings.

Periodic glucose readings and even the HBIAC test do not always reveal hyperglycemic activity from the pancreas which-left untreated- can lead to deadly complications.

A vet could sit around a VA clinic lobby for an annual blood work check up and get hungry and by the time their glucose is read -it shows up low and no cause for alarm.

The VA HBIAC test is more reliable (if the machines they use for these tests are regularly calibrated)

The veteran's own documented symptoms- which in my husband's case at first were one unusual manifestation of DMII-a dental problem revealing high glucose in his saliva-

can be the only way that VA will properly consider and diagnose this disease.

Visual problems, circulations problems, PN, skin problems,

serious heart disease and brain damage from TIAs and strokes are some of the main results of diabetes.

It took over 6 years for me to get a proper diagnosis from VA-

the award from the BVA is that first time VA recognized that the medical records revealed DMII as cause of my husband's death.

The VA could have saved his life with a few simple tests in 1988 that would have revealed he had DMII from AO.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you get into it, it's always better to clobber your opponent with their own club!

The attached extract from the VBA/DOD DM Treatment Guide documents a medical fact often ignored in decisions denying service connection for conditions caused or aggravated by DM2. Many of these conditions commonly occur as first symptoms of a case of DM2, well before a "formal DM2 diagnosis is made.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use