Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Received Brown Envelope Today ? What The F ?

Rate this question


halos2

Question

So I filed my claim in 2007 then in 2008 I get a letter denied(the usual) and I sent in a NOD with DRO review 2009 and DENOVO review.

Today I get this denial letter they received a NOD but no response to the election letter. HELLO it was clearly typed on the same!!

My VSO handed it to the VARO, as they walked across the hallway. It is ridiculous reading the SOC. They have my old compensation rate on the letter, and so much info is???? in limbo??

SO the letter states after we receive your appeal we will send your case to the BVA...

Also it is stamped signed by yet another NEW Acting Service Center Manager.

I won't be able to speak with my VSO till monday. What more could they do with my claim?

I guess someone can't read a NOD with DRO DeNovo review , and they can't read what % my compensation is either.

So how do I get these jokers to review my file and see their errors NOW before they try to send it off to BVA?

Do I request a personal hearing with the DRO? Even though the letter states I can request a personal hearing with the traveling board...I am not to be at this level!

Thank goodness they haven't jacked with my % received, as of yet though!

I have more info to send them as my vso said to gather all I could too.

Don't tell me I have to go the BVA route cause they screwed up again...I already have one at BVA. Why is it so obvious to work the claim yet they constantly try to F with us vets. When one has serious mental issues it is so wrong to not follow their own regulations.

Should I get my senator involved? Congressman?

Or wait to see what my VSO says on monday?

Any help/advice/recommendations/hints are very much appreciated. Peace be to all. Halos2. :D

Edited by halos2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Larryj, when I had my personal hearing with a DRO for another condition ...granted...deceased...tried to sever...it went from 30 to 50 but seems VSO thinks DRO 1st then if not granted go for hearing with DRO??

DRO hearing also worked for me. My VA psychiatrist sent them a letter, then called the VARO DRO and read him the riot act (I actually was there when the phone call was made, BTW). It took 2 weeks and I didn't even have to appear. Went from 20% to 70% and TDIU P&T.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bronco, thanks for emailing me the hearing/audio info it is GREAT and I believe will be beneficial with my claim...seems the VARO conveniently ??LOST?? my DRO request...so thats why they are trying to send traditional to BVA. Info from me and my VSO designates the dialog on DRO or DRO hearing from months ago. However form 9 written to dispute them jumping the gun and not utalizing DRO as requested...DOn't know what they will do with this now?? Hoping they will go with what was originally requested! But you know how they act. :D :)

I did have a DRO hearing in the past and it helped for that condition. Evidence was in file/SMR and I brought more to substantiate it too. But it took over 7 mths to schedule, then another 7+ months to get transcripts and award letter too. I know it will be worse now too.

Its up to you, but a DRO review is usually much faster than a DRO HEARING. Reason: Hearing officers are booked up for several years, while DRO reviews can be done at the regional office, so scheduling a hearing takes a long time.

You wont get to speak to a DRO officer with a DRO review, but you can tell your side of the story on a "STatement in support of claim"

You can carefully plan out exactly what you want to write down, but you could get tripped up in a hearing, where they ask you questions.

IMHO, you best bet is a DRO review and skip the hearing.

Edited by halos2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Yes. Isnt in interesting that the documents that the VA RO "looses" almost always favors the Veteran? Why doesnt the VARO shred C and P exams that are UNFAVORABLE to the Veteran? Never. That bad exam will NEVER get lost in the shuffle, never get ignored, and instead will be cited for reasons they denied you.

I am glad the hearing loss manual helped you..on page 60 it explains how hearing loss, depression, tinnitus and occupational deficiencies (that is, TDIU) are all related.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Even if it takes a little longer, and I am not sure it, will I would ask for a personal hearing with the DRO. You can ask the VA directly regardless of what your VSO says. A certified letter will do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks john999 for your help too. I would go totally insane if I didn't have the assistance of all the knowledgable vets. The assistance we all receive is so valuable to our being. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone was kind enough to me to loan me a copy of their Veterans Benefit Manual written by an attorney he stated you should write the following and specifically state also that you want a dro telephone or personal hearing.

I hope this helps

This is a notice of disagreement (NOD) to the VA letter dated ????. I disagree with all the adjudicative determinations mentioned in the above referenced VA letter and any enclosures thereto, except for those, if any, that I specifically state here that I do not want to appeal. Therefore, my notice of disagreement specifically covers all the determinations made by the regional office unless specifically excluded. I also disagree with the RO’s failure to adjudicate issues and claims it was required to adjudicate. I am specifically referring to issues that I may not have discussed but which were reasonably raised by the evidence in my VA claims file or in the VA’s possession that should have been inferred by the regional office. This appeal also includes adjudicative determinations that were mischaracterized by the regional office. If this appeal is not resolved favorably, please send me a Statement of the Case so I may appeal this decision to the Board of Veterans Appeals. In addition I am requesting a Decision Review Hearing either by telephone or a personal hearing.

Apparently, somewhere along the line if you don't nod a inferred claim you can lose it, if you only state one disagreement and there was something you missed you lose it after a year. This statement covers everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use