Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tbi Expert Dr. Van Boven

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Last weeks show was quite compelling and many many vets acessed the broadcast.

Tonight (the show link to SVR at Stardust Radio is here at hadit) Jerrel Cook Host and I as co host will be expanding the interview with Dr. Boven who also blew the whistle on VA and was terminated from the BIRLs program because he found TBI veterans were being denied the help they needed-the purpose of BIRL whioch he was hired to direct.

The promo came to me by email-I dont know how it will come out here-

The show is at 5:30 CT and 6:30 EST.We no longer have a toll free number but callers can call in at 1-319-648-5143 to ask their questions on TBI issues.

------------------------------------------

From Jerrel Cook Producer/Host SVR

The topic of Special Monthly Compensation has come up at SVR before and that all information on the many specific types and levels of SMC are all explained in detail within 38 USC 1114 and 38 CFR 3.350 with the specific medical criteria for each SMC award.By the way SMC is awarded as "S" award, "K", and then the step levels L,L 1/2 M,M 1/2 N, O,P, R-1 and R-2.

VA Moves Texas Brain Laboratory After Years Pass Without Testing

Three years ago, the Department of Veterans Affairs established a laboratory at the University of Texas at Austin with high expectations that it would conduct state-of-the art research into combat-related brain injuries. Last month, VA announced it was moving the facility, after spending more than $3 million without testing a single veteran with traumatic brain injury.

The decision follows a two-year battle between VA and the former director of the Brain Injury and Recovery Laboratory, who has accused his superiors of fraud, mismanagement and wasting taxpayer money.

The department is reopening the lab at a VA hospital in Waco, Tex., and vows the work will progress at the new location, but veterans groups want assurances the new facility will have the equipment and expertise to conduct first-class research.

"Two years without any veterans being tested and millions of dollars apparently being spent is very frustrating," said Paul Sullivan, head of Veterans for Common Sense, an advocacy group that held a rally in Austin to protest the move.

The uproar has sparked a congressional inquiry, an investigation by the federal Office of Special Counsel and several internal investigations.

"This move will place our laboratory in an ideal location that will allow us to better serve our nation's military families and veterans," Gerald Cross, VA's acting undersecretary for health, said in a statement released by the department. "This program consolidation will enable VA to meet its mission of better understanding brain injuries and to help veterans recover from such injuries."

ad_label_leftjust.gif
Researchers at Waco also will have access to what VA officials call the world's most powerful research MRI machine. The equipment "is equal, if not better, in Waco," said Diana Struski, a VA spokeswoman.

Veterans groups have held high hopes that the research would provide answers to some of the problems that have plagued veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Studies have estimated that about 20 percent of troops returning from those theaters have suffered traumatic brain injuries, though the injuries have proven difficult to detect in many cases.

"This is very important in the long term," Sullivan said. "We believe the brain scan equipment may find subtle injuries that could not be found before."

The laboratory was established by a $6.3 million VA grant awarded in 2003 in collaboration with the University of Texas, which houses a state-of-the-art brain scanner. Robert W. Van Boven, a neurosurgeon, was hired as program director in 2007. Within months, he complained that $1.2 million of the grant money had been wasted before his arrival, and he later alleged that superiors would not investigate his claims.

An investigation by the VA Office of Inspector General last year "partially substantiated" the allegation of mismanagement of department funds.

The investigation neither substantiated nor refuted alleged use of equipment for research of questionable scientific merit, but it did find "multiple deficiencies" in protocols.

Page 2 of 2
<

VA Moves Texas Brain Laboratory After Years Pass Without Testing

TOOLBOX
font_resize_small.giffont_resize_medium.giffont_resize_large.gif
Resize
advert.gifctct_180x31.gifB3351609;sz=1x1;ord=2926298?
#yiv1684857592 #yiv1587484973 #yiv1237585079 #yiv1722675943 #ArticleCommentsWrapper {display:block;}#yiv1684857592 COMMENT
comment_icon.gif
39 Comments |
POST A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment.
|
open_12x12.gif
Log In Again?
comment_policy_close.gif
We've made some updates to washingtonpost.com's Groups, MyPost and comment pages. We need you to verify your MyPost ID by logging in before you can post to the new pages. We apologize for the inconvenience.

A subsequent investigation by the Office of Research Oversight for the Veterans Health Administration found that the program's "research activities lacked appropriate administrative supervision."

A team from the House Veterans' Affairs subcommittee on oversight and investigations visited Texas last month to look into the allegations and interview VA officials.

Van Boven was fired in January, which the doctor alleges was in retaliation for his whistleblowing. VA cannot discuss the reasons for Van Boven's termination, Struski said.

The Office of Special Counsel, an independent agency that protects federal employees from reprisals for whistleblowing, has completed its investigation and has begun its legal analysis, according to David Marshall, a lawyer representing Van Boven.

"As a matter of policy, we do not comment on whether or not we are investigating a matter," said Darshan Sheth, an OCS lawyer.

Van Boven has told the committee staff that the move to Waco is an attempt by VA to sweep problems under the rug, and that it will squander the benefits of "incomparable" neuroscience research at the University of Texas at Austin.

John Miterko, head of the government affairs committee for Vietnam Veterans of America, said his organization is concerned the decision to move to Waco may have been "made precipitously" in response to Van Boven's allegations.

"Is this a knee-jerk reaction because he was a whistleblower?" Miterko said. "That I don't know. That's why I'd like to see these investigations carried out."

Struski said the problems uncovered at the laboratory in Austin were "part of the decision" for the move. She said VA also wanted to eliminate "a lot of duplication" with work that will be conducted at the Waco facility, which is getting a $49.9 million upgrade.

VA says the Waco location will also enable it to work with service members stationed at nearby Fort Hood, the largest U.S. Army installation in the world.

(full story at Washington Post and VA Watchdog)

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

What station is SVR Stardust radio on exactly. Is it FM or AM and what is the dial address. You can tell I know nothing about this. I knew a Marine who was a high school friend who got blown off an APC and had headaches. They never mentioned TBI and I bet he did not get a dime in compensation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John-the station is in Iowa at 1630 AM- I need to check that but it is on their homepage.Their primary audience is all on line to hear the show- we are heard in Iraq, Afganistan and countless other countries-wherever a serviceman or women or veteran is -they can hear the show via their PC with a media player and if they join the chat feature they can interact on line with us.

Only the chatters see the chat and we get copies of it after the show-there is much cabitzing and humor sometimes in the chat that gets off the track but we all know each other anyhow from hadit or other vet sites.

But Chatters also ask provocative questions we can ask the guest.We also get our show CUEs sometimes in the chat room so that we know we have a call in or worse yet- if there is a pending tornado (I am serious)weather is our prime concern when it is showtime.

Try the Stardust link here John- and see if there is any show on the air -there are many other types of shows at Stardust too- and this will give you idea of how your media player is picking up the show.

Jerrel is in Missouri, I am in NY, and Jeff (Stardust) is in Iowa in a station he built onto his home -fully FCC licensed.

As a civilian all he ever wanted to do was have a radio station that could honor our military and help veterans.

He sure has succeeded but it isn't easy and not profitable for him at all.

The host Jerrel and I and our guests are all contacted by phone before the show- and our PCs literally become sattelite stations as we do the shows by phone, reaching thousands.

Dr. Van Bowen is a great guest- I certainly had a point that hopefully reached many vets last night when I mentioned Symptomatology on TBI.

I have read countless BVA cases where the vet was denied for TBI because they had suffered a pre service or post service injury or auto accident that the BVA said had caused their TBI.

Without any documented syptomotalogy consistent with a TBI in a pre or post service injury-

then the vet needs to show documentation of symptomatology of TBI (there are countless symptoms) shortly after the TBI inservice event.

If VA has no real proof or evidence that something else caused the TBI but for service, then 'no' evidence becomes the veteran's best approach to support the inservice etiology.

I also mentioned hubris but hope no one took that wrong-

the example I gave was say a IED puts 5 men and women down and a medic does triage. Say one of the servicemen/women is knocked out for a few minutes, but gets up, dusts themselves off and appears to have minor scratches or bruises and then immediately begins to help the medic and denies any real problems from the blast as they want to either help with wounded or-as you guys did in Vietnam-and I imagine in Iraq too-to retaliate with fire if IED origin can be assessed.

The soldier who appears to have the most minor IED injury could in fact have the worst TBI affect.Or at least have some brian trauma they might not realise for quite some time.

I think many many Vietnam vets and vets in other combat scenarios certainly suffered TBI from explosions and the shock waves but never were treated for TBI nor was it assessed in-theatre.

SMRs however could reveal headaches, malaise, confusion, short term memory problems and other symptomatology that could be associated with a proven blast or land mine event-even an auto accident in the field -and even buddy statements -that could help a vet claim TBI from a past inservice injury.

TBI became the "signature" wound of Iraq due in part to modern weaponry.

Actually it was a signature wound of warfare since the beginning of time when you use common sense.

Dr. Van Bowen blew the whistle on VA when he found VA had wasted over 3 million so far on their TBI program and as he said not a single TBI vet has benefited yet from the VA's sophisticated TBI technology.Nor from the money allocated to treating TBI vets.

That is beyond outrage.Where did the money go?

And what is the VA really doing for these TBI vets?

As you well know many were given a PD diagnosis before they were found to have -not PD at all but a physical traumatic closed head injury-TBI. Which has ophysical, emotional, and neurological affects.

The TBI C & P- the new one dated 2007 is quite comprehensive.

I wonder how many TBI vets actually get all the testing these new TBI C & Ps require.

We all use the link here to Stardust Radio, and then click on the SVR button and the show should come through your media player.

To join the show's chat room takes a few minutes to download that and chat roomer people (many are hadit members) can ask questions there in the on line chat that Jerrel or me can ask the guest.

Anyone with a PC with media players can access and participate in the shows.

Also the shows are taped and available where the SVR archived shows are.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

I really want to be in the Chat room for this show. I got started with something and didn't remember until it was too late. I need to invent some kind of planner that has alarms that will go off several times before an event happens.

Now I will have to go to the SVR archives to listen to what happened.

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use