Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Mental Retardation And/or Developmental Delay Rvn Vet Needs Help

Rate this question


tssnave

Question

Need ideas - with supporting citations to M21-1MR, CFR, and court cases - concerning Presumption of Soundness for Duty or any other avenue to help a boots in country, non combatant, honorably discharged, unmarried RVN vet who is mentally retarded and/or developmentally delayed get access to VA healthcare. He has no other mental illness dx or physical disability dx. He hasn’t worked for years due to his mental illness and he is not currently using any VA services.

- I know he can get access to VA healthcare based on low income but he’d be a Category 8 vet so we all know he’d go to the back of the line.

- He should be eligible for a VA pension but hasn’t applied.

- However, if he’s eligible, disability would be the best way to go but other than a possible argument based on the Presumption of Soundness I don’t know of an avenue to use and I doubt, without another mental illness dx, that he could successfully argue Soundness (even though he was able to serve out his hitch).

1. Could he, with a strong IMO, mount a successful argument that his time in the military aggravated his mental retardation?

2. Are there any court cases where a vet has been successful in getting disability when mental retardation was present but not noted in his SMRs and is still present without any other mental illness dx?

3. Any other avenue of approach to try in this case?

Thanks,

TS Snave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the replies - this guy was a cook in RVN. Served his time and got out and hasn't been able to hold a job since.

He is applying for SS after all these years because his family may no longer be able to take care of him.

It is my understanding that he does not have any other mi which may be due, at least in part, to his retardation (you'd have to have enough awareness and understanding of the situation to develop anxiety or PTSD, etc).

I will continue to encourage the family to get him enrolled in VA healthcare as well as apply for a VA pension.

If there are any other suggestions, I'll pass them along.

Thanks again for all the help,

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Need ideas - with supporting citations to M21-1MR, CFR, and court cases - concerning Presumption of Soundness for Duty or any other avenue to help a boots in country, non combatant, honorably discharged, unmarried RVN vet who is mentally retarded and/or developmentally delayed get access to VA healthcare. He has no other mental illness dx or physical disability dx. He hasn’t worked for years due to his mental illness and he is not currently using any VA services.

- I know he can get access to VA healthcare based on low income but he’d be a Category 8 vet so we all know he’d go to the back of the line.

- He should be eligible for a VA pension but hasn’t applied.

- However, if he’s eligible, disability would be the best way to go but other than a possible argument based on the Presumption of Soundness I don’t know of an avenue to use and I doubt, without another mental illness dx, that he could successfully argue Soundness (even though he was able to serve out his hitch).

1. Could he, with a strong IMO, mount a successful argument that his time in the military aggravated his mental retardation?

2. Are there any court cases where a vet has been successful in getting disability when mental retardation was present but not noted in his SMRs and is still present without any other mental illness dx?

3. Any other avenue of approach to try in this case?

Thanks,

TS Snave

My suggestion is that you look into this veteran's eligibility for non service connected disability pension. Also make sure you request a copy of all of this veteran's service records to make sure there are no other conditions he could claim service connection for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use