Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

After Remand Is Addressed

Rate this question


mrsvet28

Question

Question: after the BVA remand exams as requested are finished ..then it goes back to the RO to be approved or denied is that correct protocol? or am I missing something

Thanks Mrsvet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Question: after the BVA remand exams as requested are finished ..then it goes back to the RO to be approved or denied is that correct protocol? or am I missing something

Thanks Mrsvet

If that's what the BVA remand states.

Sometimes it is good to read over the remand 5 times,

then walk away for an hour and go back and read it

another 5 times.

The legal BS just gets sooo confusing.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can also be granted or denied by the Appeals Management Center, depending on where the Board sent the remand. Actually, whether it's the VARO or the AMC, the decision is not the final decision from the Board. It's more or less a recommendation to the Board as to how to decide; the Board can either concur or disagree and do something else. When you get the decision back from the VARO or the AMC, if you disagree with it, you can respond with another Notice of Disagreement to the Board (I'd cc the VARO or the AMC, wherever that decision came from). If the Board decides to deny the appeal, you then have 120 days to file an appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. That takes it out of the VA system and puts it into the Judicial system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes, the BVA,Remand,BVA cycle can go on for 20 years. You get the remand exam and the VA does another inadequate or biased exam and you are right back to the appeals again unless you get an IMO to tilt the balance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello All Hope All Is Well

BVA has remanded my claim to VARO via the AMC for further development,

The Reason for the remand is I provided the necessary documentation to show clearly the errors of the system.Now my concern is this how isit that the Various Agencies apply rules to the claimant to reply or respond however they can drag this out to there liking? This is non productive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would suggest two things in this instance:

1) Keep close track of that remand. If it goes beyond 18 months, and you cannot get a satisfactory response from an IRIS inquiry via the VA's website (and I'd put money on your not getting one), I'd file a Writ of Mandamus request with the Court. We've done that, and it worked to get the remand out of the AMC and to the Board.

2) Be careful that the VARO doesn't withdraw the appeal without your permission. The VARO we deal with, for some reason, told the Board that the veteran withdrew the appeal when the veteran did NOT withdraw the appeal. No one but the veteran or his/her representative of record (with the veteran's written approval) can withdraw a Board-remanded appeal.

We've given the VARO until the end of the month to fix this. If not, we've given them until the end of the month to issue the veteran an SOC. If neither one happens, we'll be filing another Writ of Mandamus request to the Court.

Be very careful to keep track of your Board-remanded appeals as to how long they're taking, and where they are in the process. If this happened to us, it can also happen to you.

Edited by vaf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use