Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Military Medical And Health Records

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Military Medical and Health Records

http://www.archives.gov/veterans/military-...ds/medical.html

taken from the archives web page..........

[Veterans who plan to file a claim for medical benefits with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) do not need to request a copy of their military health record from NPRC (MPR).]

I requested my records from the VARO for over 25 years & "NEVER" received a response of any kind.

I finally found this website & requested a copy of my records from them. I received a reply from the archives center that the VARO had all my original records in their position not long after I left service in the mid 70's.

When I finally received my service medical records from the VARO, three years were missing. The three years that would have shown ongoing treatment records for the injuries I'm claiming.

If you did not receive a complete copy of your records when you left service, request your records from the archives center "FIRST" or some of yours may go missing before the DVA sends them to you.

Allan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

If I am understanding this correctly, when a claim is filed, then the SMRs are sent from St. Louis to the VARO, and kept there until two years have passed with no further activity. In requesting a copy of all my SMRs, I assumed that the RO would only get a copy of the SMRs, and the original file would remain in archives.

If the original SMRs are sent to RO, then there is nothing to prevent them from removing/shredding/burning/changing/losing any SMRs that are contrary to the VARO's decisions. That's kinda of scary isn't it? We have no one to watch the watchers. And people wonder how medical records end up disappearing. Maybe they have a wheel they spin and it has slots that say approve or deny. If it comes up deny, then they just change the evidence to match the spin. They not only control the SMRs, but also the results of the C&P exams.

Isn't there an oversight committee or something that an address can be posted about, so we can write and complain?

If nothing changes, then Nothing Changes.

One other thing... How can you request a copy of all your SMRs from the VARO, if they have your SMRs? Would it be a 21-4138 or Release of Information?

Edited by Bonzai

"It is a terrible thing, when you lose your train of thought and you only have a one track mind"... Me

96C2P/96F2P (old MOS designations)

97E2P/37F2P (new MOS designations)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, it's worse than you think.

Prior to 1992, all records--personnel, health (SMR), and clinical records/notes--all went to the NPRS in St Louis. In 1992, the Army began sending personnel and health (SMR) directly to the VA, bypassing the NPRS, for safekeeping and storage. The other services followed suit, with the Coast Guard being the final service to begin sending records directly to the VA beginning in 1998.

Clinical records--the inpatient hospital notes--are still submitted by the hospital to the NPRS.

Since all new records go to the VA anyway, I doubt they send anything to the NPRS anymore--but that's just a guess.

The upside is that the we don't have to wait for the VA to request and NPRS to locate and ship records when a claim as filed. Post shreddergate, maybe not a completely good idea.

With service medical records available electronically, all services should be required to provide separating servicemembers with an electronic copy, along with a hard copy of any paper records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The down side is; we have to get the raters at the VA to fully read the records and then reach a fair decision. They sometimes do not even turn the page, when preparing the denial letter.

Edited by Commander Bob 92-93

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

With the back log of claims, the VA is more interested in the quantity of decisions made. Not the quality.

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Bob

According to what I have heard is that if the VA gets information there is an assumption that they have read and evaluated it. That, of course, is BS. In my original claim the VA simply excluded all information that did not agree with their low ball rating. My recent decisions have been favorable to me, but just awful as far as the rational for the decisions. Really, I can't understand how they made these ratings. This is why persistence is what really wins claims. Even if you have great evidence you have to be a bull dog to win. You keep throwing the dice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep yep, before they even start rating a claim they are in a mindset of how to get denied so they get their bonus.

frank

The down side is; we have to get the raters at the VA to fully read the records and then reach a fair decision. They sometimes do not even turn the page, when preparing the denial letter.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use