Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Got The Big Envelope Fro The Bva But...

Rate this question


militarynurse

Question

Claim from 1993...denied at RO apealed denied BVA apealed then eventually in 2006 won remand at Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims back to BVA...denied again at RO in 2008 NOD, no SOC to date, hearing at RO, more comp exams ordered, late 2008 RO sends claim back to the BVA and now in Aug 2009 BVA remands the appeal back to the RO via the Appeals Management Center with order for more comp exams. HUH???

I now have had 2 sets of the same comp exams that were not used at all ostensibly as they were "too old" due to not acted on in time by the VA...what a waste of time and taxpayer's money...and now the VA wants another third set.

Any tips?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Berta

You know quoting that decision at the top of every claim might be a good idea. Perhaps print it on the outside of every letter to the VA. Lawyers in Florida who are doing insurance claims stamp the law on the envelopes that states the insurance company must make a decision on benefits within X number of days.

TestVet

What ( I hate to ask) is SCOTUS? You know that anything that is a major decision in favor of vets is going to be appealed by the VA. They get to use taxpayor money to appeal cases in favor of vets. I am sure they curse the day they ever accepted the date to make DMII presumptive for AO.

Supreme Court Of The United States

Vietnam 66, 67/68. Combat Aircrewman doing search and rescue in N Vietnam. HS-6

Combat Vets Association

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Bob

We must be brothers separated at birth. I have a claim dating back to 1973 that was mishandled. I am CUEing it via my lawyer. The VA did not really mishandle it. They rigged it for me to lose. They just excluded all the evidence in the record that supported a higher rating. What did your original claim look like? Mine was two pages, no appeal rights, no discussion, no reasons and basis. Just my in-service medical records and an opinion from a VA doctor that spoke to me once. My doctor's records were excluded. I trusted them to be fair....duh. I did not know really understand this til years later when I got my C-file.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Bob

We must be brothers separated at birth.

We are a band of brothers, John. I still get a little nervous twitch when ever I get ten feet from my C-file... LOL... I am letting a NSO play with my claim for a little bit longer. I must say, he is not the brightest bulb on the lot. However, when I feel better, I'll drop him like a hot potato, and stop messing around with the RO and DRO review requests. etc. and file my own appeal to the BVA. I am looking forward to receiving a "Statement of the Case"...LOL I still have visions of taking my case to the Haig.

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I remember the day that I would not even open a letter from the VA. It never was good news.

Berta you are a gold mine.

Test I think that you and Berta and John are on the right tract and to also mention spoliation in ever NOD might not be a bad idea and also to use all records to make a determination as it seems that VA has slipped in duty to assist to require Veteran to specifically ask for what they want and be limited by the Vets pleadings.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

John yea what Shark said rofl

Edited by Testvet

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Yes, I actually got "fast" claim service at the Va..they finally did mine in a little over 7 years. I do have a friend, in group counseling, who also applied in 1973..he is hoping for an answer on his claim "any day".

The VA saying that it takes an average of 6 months to processs a claim is a massive distortion of the truth.

A denial may take only six months..but what use is a denial to a Veterans..it just means he starts and a very long appeal process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use