Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Do You Think That I Can Get Permanent And Total Using:

Rate this question


Cherie33

Question

I received a letter from Social Security stating "Notice of Attorney Advisor Decision - Fully Favorable" dated Aug 21, 2009. (Basically, I was awarded ssdi from Jan 1, 2006)

Does anyone think that I can use this as evidence of being Permanent and Total? I am already 70% + IU.

Thanks,

Cherie33

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Cherie - a permenate and total status is not something that is simply added. It must be presented in the same manner as any claim. By this I mean medical documentation. One of your posts indicate that your VA doc say you will "probably" never work again. The "probably" really needs to go away and they need to say that you are unable to seek and hold gainful employment.

I understand what you are saying about the SSDI letter but as has already been posted the VA is not bound by the SSA's decisions. However, I can almost assure you that in your case they will use it because it contains disabilities that you are not service connected for.

So the bottom line is that you ask your docs if they think you are unemployable and if so will the put it in writing along with their rationale as to why they think you are unemployable.

Ricky

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes, the VA will hang your NSC conditions around your neck and claim that is the reason you can't work. They did it to me, and they only used four words of a sentence in my own doctor's report. It took another medical report to make it clear I was IU P&T soley due to my SC conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broncovet you make a VERY good point... so do the rest of you. Just follow this advice and treat the IU like any other injury claim. Show what makes you unemployable, and show how its service connected. The letter from the doc saying "probably" is good, but as stated "certainly" is better if you can get it.

Personally I think the VA should approve vets for IU if they qualify for SSD or vice-versa, but that would make too much sense.

Bob

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me add my 2 cents worth to the rest of the many comments...

I agree that you must make darn sure the reason ss was awarded was for a service connected disability. However, in some cases just because SS finds you disabled, does not mean that the VA will find you totally disabled. Remember the VA rates in increments of 10, but under social security rules you either are disabled or you are not there is no middle ground. As a prior service officer, I have seen such cases denied, where the va thought that regardless of SS findings they would not grant total disability to a veteran because as they stated the veteran was rated properly under va rules.

Remember also, that a P&T status is the va's way of saying your condition will never inprove, but only your doctors know if this is the case or not, so it would be wise to request a statement from you care provider to the effect that it is unlikely that you would ever return to work. With out such a statement from a doctor, I am not sure the va could make such a determination.

As you know that once granted a P&T status, you will be awarded chapter 35 education benefits for your spouse and children, and if you are not retired from the military they also will be allowed medical care under ChampusVA, if you pay a premium.

Unless you have children, or a spouse it may not benefit you in the end to request a P&T status.

Also keep in mind, just because you are granted P&T does not mean the va can't do a relook later and find that you are no longer P&T. In fact if you know anything about the VA nothing is really Permanent even if the said it is.

Best of luck in what ever you decide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank's to all of you. I want to apply for P&T because of the benefits that my state offers, as well as the Champus VA benefit. And I truly believe that I am P & T. I know nothing is ever p & T with the VA unless you've had that rating for more than 20 years. But, I'll be ready, simply because I truly am disabled.

Thanks for your help and as soon as I can speak with my doctors I will ask about a letter.

Cherie33

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use